Management Styles

1010 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: 3 management styles

There are several very different types of management styles ranging from democratic which allows the subordinates to play an active role in the decisions that management makes to autocratic which cuts the subordinate out of the decision making process allowing those in management to make a unilateral decision. Both styles have their proponents as well as their detractors. This paper will outline the various forms of management and attempt to clarify and categorize their various strengths and weaknesses.
I. AUTOCRATIC
________________________________________
As previously mentioned, this form of management does not consider what the subordinates or employees think; but rather allows the members of management to make unilateral decisions that they think are in the best interest of the organization. Though the employees may not particularly like this form of management, it does allow management to efficiently guide the organization in the direction that they feel it should go. Within the autocratic style of management there are at least two sub categories, directive and permissive.
In the directive autocratic style the manager make all of the decisions regardless of what the employees think. The manager also tends to closely monitor the employees, not allowing them to deviate from the plan (Exploring Different Management Styles).
In contrast the permissive autocratic style still allows the manager to make whatever decision he or she feels is in the best interest of the organization, while still allowing subordinates the ability to execute their job as they see best as long as they achieve the goal set by the manager (Exploring Different Management Styles).
Though many employees do not care to work under an autocratic manager some or...

... middle of paper ...

...ganization, it cannot be denied that the style will have a direct bearing on the future course of it.

Works Cited

Exploring Different Management Styles. n.d. Website. 5 November 2013. .
Goleman, Daniel, Richard Boyatzis and Annie McKee. Primal Leadership, With a New Preface by the Authors: Unleashing the Power of Emotional Intelligence. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, 2013. Print.
Hindle, Tim. Theories X and Y. 6 October 2008. Electronic. 9 December 2013. .
Rajinder, Kaur. "Managerial Styles in the Public Sector." Indian Journal of Industrial Relations (Vol. 28, No. 4, April, 1993): 363-368. Print. van Marrewijk, Marcel and Joanna Timmers. "Human Capital Management: New Possibilities in People Management." Journal of Business Ethics (Vol. 44, 2003): 171-184. Print.

Show More
Related

  • Leadership and Management

    1859 Words  | 4 Pages

    The result is a relaxed atmosphere, but one where there are dew guidelines and directions. This can sometimes result in poor productivity and lack of motivation as employees have little incentive to work hard. Autocratic leaders centralize power and decision making in themselves. They structure the complete work situation for their employees, who are expected to do what they are told and not think for themselves.

    Read More

  • Autocratic, Democratic, Laissez-Faire Are The Three Basic Leadership Styles

    704 Words  | 2 Pages

    (a) Autocratic, Democratic, Laissez-Faire are the three basic leadership styles. A leader who has Autocratic leadership style is primary concern is only job related and low consideration about the employee. They say to employees what to do and closely watch over performance and give little or no support for them to work out. Democratic leadership style is a high consideration about employee and low concern about job. Tell employees to do their way and oversee the performance at major stages and develop a supportive relationship with the employee. Laissez-Faire leadership style is low consideration about employee and job task. They provide little or no direction and support to perform. (b) My plan of action is getting an associate with the employee and support them what they really want better job performance as much as I can. I encourage to motivate them to work hard and help to build up their self-confidence with accomplishment.

    Read More

  • Negative Leadership Behavior

    1061 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ader should understand their employees. As discussed the authoritarian leadership is not the best way. As a leader one must include the subordinates into a team and respect their opinions. Leaders should know how to motivate by encouragement and to find out what your employees want and find a way to give it to them or to enable them to earn it.

    Read More

  • Coercive Theory Of Leadership

    1673 Words  | 4 Pages

    Continuously, there is the affiliative style which means that a leader creates a positive harmony for his employees (Six leadership styles: selecting the right leader, 2016). In other words, that leader put people first and tasks second. The Democratic leader focuses on the decision making, also, the employees in this organisation have the skills, knowledge require. Therefore, the leader trust them in their

    Read More

  • What Is Leadership Style

    794 Words  | 2 Pages

    Some more so than others, but all have their place. One of THE most important things an effective leader must possess is integrity. Integrity is the cornerstone of an effective leader no matter what style he or she chooses to use. As you can see the Laissez-Faire style lacks a leader with integrity. The group must be able to count on the leader’s knowledge, skills, dependability and their ability to make a decision and support that decision. More often than not a blend of all three types is seen. The Democratic style gets the ideas moving, when the leader sees the group is managing the problem solving well he or she may switch to the Laissez-Faire and use the hands off approach if the problem is not being solved or gets out of control, then the Authoritative style may be more effective in getting the result

    Read More

  • Vroom Jago Leadership Model

    819 Words  | 2 Pages

    Autocratic I (A1). The leader takes a decision completely at his discretion without the knowledge or consent of the team members in this style of leadership. This style of decision making is possible only in cases where there is not a lot at stake with the out come of this decision, when the employees’ decision is not exactly crucial for the outcome of the project, or when a leader thinks decision can be arrived at based on the information at hand and thinks any additional information isn’t needed from the team members to take a good and calculated decision.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Autocratic And Transformational Leadership Theories

    1227 Words  | 3 Pages

    Autocratic leadership theory is a part of the behavioural approach. In this leadership theory, leader makes all decisions and uses power to command and control the followers to achieve goal. According to Lewin(1939), “autocratic leaders are associated with high-performing groups, but that close supervision is necessary and feeling of hostility are often present” (p.173). It is incredibly efficient and tasks are completed quickly. Autocratic leadership can be beneficial when decisions need to be making quickly. For example, in emergency situation surgeon uses this theory because the patient’s situation is between life and death and there is no time to discuss with other members. Bass (2008) mentioned in the Leadership styles and theories article, “Autocratic leaders can be effective because they create good structure, and determine what needs to be done. They provide rewards for compliance, but punish disobedience” (Giltinane, 2013, p. 35-37).

    Read More

  • Six Diverse Styles of Leadership

    1132 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Leadership is the ability to inspire confidence and support among the people who are needed to achieve organizational goals” (DuBrin). In order to be classified as an effective leader, one must also be an effective manager. Effective leadership is proven to have the most results when using flexibility throughout the mission. There are six diverse styles of leadership which are significant ways to get results. These six styles consist of coercive, authoritative, affiliative, democratic, pacesetting, and coaching. Leading is a term that defines the daily actions of people happening around the world every day. The concentration a leader has is to get results. You need be aware that any form of results may possibly take time, therefor patience is a key. “Every business person knows a story about a highly intelligent, highly skilled executive who was promoted into a leadership position only to fail at the job. They also know a story about someone with solid—but not extraordinary—intellectual abilities and technical skills who was promoted into a similar position and then soared” (Goleman). Any person can use these six most effective types of leadership skills to be successful in their journey of attaining their mission. These types of leadership skills stem from a term called emotional intelligence. Emotional Intelligence is four capabilities which help the results of leading effectively and distinctively. Those who were found leading by the emotional intelligence were found to be much more outstanding, and those who lacked the set of emotional intelligence were underachieved. Effective leaders are attainable; however it will also rely on quality of performance, experience, motivation, and desire to acquire success. Jeffrey Preston Be...

    Read More

  • Personality Traits And Leadership Styles Of Great Leaders

    731 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...esearch of the situation. This leadership style is beneficial in situations where a quick decision is necessary. The downside to this type of leadership is people who tend to use an autocratic leadership style are seen as controlling and dictatorial. This type of behavior can lead to resentment with the other group members.

    Read More

  • The Authoritarian Style Of Leadership And Democratic Leadership Style

    733 Words  | 2 Pages

    The authoritarian style of leadership for many may seem harsh and extremely cut and dry. However that is not the case. For some people the best way to function is to create a system that works best for their planning ideas and methods. The Authoritarian style of leadership is the best method in this scenario. It allows one to plan in great detail how a scenario should play out and what each person involved should to do to meet the end goal. Perhaps because of the word authoritarian it seems

    Read More

  • Style Of Leadership

    1222 Words  | 3 Pages

    These requirements are intended to lead the organization to its fullest potential. The autocratic leader that make all the decisions is necessary for an organization such as an orchestra. Think of how an orchestra would sound if they utilized another form of leadership. Each instrument would fail to be precisely orchestrated with the others, the resulting music would be very difficult to listen to. The most important aspect of the autocratic leader is that this leader must always be leading and their followers must be willing to abide to the leaders authority. The consultative leader is willing to hear the perspective of others. After seeking the opinions of the followers the consultative leader then makes a decision. This type of leadership gives the followers a chance to be heard. Most importantly it gives the leader a chance to get to know the followers and to hear their opinions on how the organization should carry on their business. The final decision remains with leader. The participative leader is utilized for teams, the decision making power is a team effort. The leader will make decisions if team is unable to come to a consensus. The importance of this type of leadership is, that it gives each member of the team “ownership”, this can improve the morale. The free-rein leader gives the guidelines and the followers are free to choose how to accomplish the end goal. The most important aspect of this

    Read More

  • My Leadership Style: My Personal Types Of Leadership

    708 Words  | 2 Pages

    Usually leaders display many different traits. I personally think that autocratic and free rein can be pretty much equally harmful for a good team work. It mainly depends on the business setting and the team needs whether a certain type would meet the organization’s needs. In the case of autocratic style, all decisions are made singlehandedly thus opening the door for many mistakes. Matters are viewed one-sided and many issues can be overlooked and misinterpreted. Such style seems to suppress the natural desire of many people for creativity and contribution to their work; it can feel very suffocating and making people believe that they cannot make a difference. The advantage of this style is displayed in crisis when the decisions must be made fast and enacted immediately (Amanchukwu, Stanley, Ololube, 2015). In the case of free rein too much liberty is given to the employees and sometimes the work place might look like anarchy. There are many situations when the person that manages the business must step in and offer guidance while enforcing the rules and regulations, and when that doesn’t happen, the people might feel lost. If too much liberty is given many due dates might be missed; the organization might start looking very “disorganized” and even unprofessional. Such leadership style might be beneficial in businesses that require their team members to possess flexibility, creativity, or innovative

    Read More

  • Bureaucracy

    990 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to Max Weber, bureaucracy is the most efficient and most rational known means of exercising authority over human beings (Weber, p223). Further it is reliable, precise and stable, these are all terms that are desired for large complex organizations that need to control vast amounts of employees. Bureaucracy is based on legitimate authority, those that are being controlled by others; accept oppression as part of the work along. There are several characteristics that mold a particular organization into following the bureaucracy model, such as, rules, hierarchy, salaried careers, written documents and appointment. These characteristics serve as a guideline, or an owner's manual of sorts that has a preconceived effect for each cause with the organization. Even if bureaucracy is working to its full capacity within an organization, there can be times when is no longer efficient to use alone. Bureaucracy is still used within organization but usually in conjunction with an alternative.

    Read More

  • Taylor's and Weber's Theories of Management

    1089 Words  | 3 Pages

    Similarly in Weber’s bureaucratic approach, organizations are divided into different echelons with each varying in its degrees of influence. Each unit being commanded by the one above it, a system that promotes stability and has a predictable line of communication. Both approaches of management rely heavily on regulated control. Whether governing task scientifically of people authoritatively. A solid form of control is mus...

    Read More

  • Four Leadership Style Essay

    1244 Words  | 3 Pages

    Autocratic leaders also known as authoritarian leaders are leaders that have absolute authority over subordinates, are in control of the situation they are in, dictate and enforce orders, rarely consult with or ask opinions of others, are highly task driven, and the emotional needs of people are a low priority. The advantage of an Autocratic leader is they typically achieve results quickly; they would make a great leader during the time of crisis or when a project

    Read More

More about Management Styles

Open Document