Louis XIV and His Court

774 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: marie antoinette influence on french revolution

There were many negative comments and many positive comments about Louis XIV and his court. In Louis XIV’s court, the closer a person was to the king, or the more he did for a person, the more that person likes him. The more distant you were from the king, the more you disliked him. People that were more distant from the king disliked him more. Madame de Motteville’s Account of The Parisian Disturbances (which was a second hand account) painted a positive picture of the court. Madame de Motteville was a person who was closer to the king. She painted a positive picture because she liked the king due to her good position in the court. “And without considering the duty they owed to Marshal La Meilleraye, they threw rocks at him.” (I, 24) The quote reflects that she thinks of the nobles and upper class as better, and assumes they are correct, while the peasants are lesser and wrong. She states in the above quote that the peasants threw rocks without thinking of the duty that they owed to the Marshal. She disregarded reasons why the peasants would be throwing rocks and went straight to why the peasants should not be throwing rocks. Jean-Baptiste Colbert, who was a French minister, held the king in high esteem because he had a good position in the royal courts. “He [Colbert] also thought that it would be necessary to strike a large number of medals, to consecrate for posterity the memory of the great deeds which the king had already achieved and which he foresaw would be followed by deeds even greater and more noteworthy.” (VIII, 200) Colbert thought so highly of the king that he assumed the above quote. He thought of the king so highly because of the good position he had and how much the king liked him. Primi Visconti, w... ... middle of paper ... ...han the feeling that the heart belongs to another creature [Madame de Montespan] when God would like to have it. How hard it must be to withdraw from this arrangement! Still, it must be done, Sire, or there is no hope of salvation.” (VII, 171) Bossuet tell Louis XIV this without stressing over losing his popularity with the king and therefore power and influence on other important people because Bossuet is a Bishop, so the king could not simply disregard him, as he could with nobles. The more positive things Louis XIV could do for a person, the more that person liked him (or at least pretended to like him), such as Madame de Motteville’s and Jean-Baptiste Colbert. On the contrary, if Louis XIV had more of a negative effect on a person’s life, the less that person liked him, such as the peasants and Esprit Fléchier. Works Cited Louis XIV and His Court. n.d.

Show More
Related

  • Honor In Molière's Play 'Tartuffe'

    1477 Words  | 3 Pages

    Orgon was swindled by Tartuffe out of all his possessions because he agreed to marry Tartuffe to his daughter, Mariane. In addition to this, Tartuffe also got hold of Orgon’s strongbox that held papers of an enemy of the king that Orgon was hiding. Instead of providing a punishment the king shows mercy for Orgon’s crime in the Gentleman’s soliloquy. The Gentleman tell of how “the King now [chooses] to invalidate the deed of gift that cost you your estate, and finally he pardons your offense in shielding even a friend at his expense” (1935). These were actions that Orgon did incorrectly and therefore “the courage that [Orgon] once displayed against [the King’s] enemies” has now led to the mercy that the king gifts him (1939). The Gentleman finished this praise of Orgon by the king with a characteristic of him that is also meant for flattery. He reminds Orgon that the king “remembers help better than harm” (1944). King Louis XIV would be honored if his subjects remembered this about him even if it was not completely true. Tartuffe captures the king as this type of person and will be remembered this way because this is a timeless and still famous story in

    Read More

  • Louis XIV

    967 Words  | 2 Pages

    The second thing about Louis that made him a good leader was that he had

    Read More

  • Louis XIV vs. Julius Caesar

    1371 Words  | 3 Pages

    Louis XIV was one of France’s most powerful leaders. He was born on September 5, 1638, at Saint Germain-en-Laye. His father, Louis XIII died when Louis was young. He had it better than many other young French rulers did. “His father’s death spared Louis XIV the beatings and abuse usually given to French princes” (Buranelli 23). His mother and Marzarin, the cardinal, raised him. He had tutors who gave him an education. Marzarin taught him everything he would need to know about court ceremony, war, and the craft of kingship. It is obvious that Louis has been brought up very different than other young kings. That is what might account for his unique style of ruling. When Marzarin died in 1661, France was shocked to find out that Louis refused to select a first minister (Michael 73). He wanted to rule alone. He chose Jean Baptiste Colbert as his financial advisor. Louis had many goals. His main one was to weaken the power of the nobles. Louis feared the nobles. He felt they were a threat to his reign. So he did all he could to make sure they would not stand in his way. He also wanted France to achieve economic, political, and cultural brilliance (Buranelli 121). As a king, Louis was very dedicated to his country. He wanted to be ruling France during its glory. He did accomplish his goal. During the high point of his reign, France was the most powerful country in Europe. Louis also gained France some new territory. He was a very extravagant ruler. Louis had a huge palace constructed for him to live in. Many other rulers were jealous of the power and luxury that he had. All of his subjects were very impressed with his rule. His life came to a sudden stop when he died during his sleep in 1715.

    Read More

  • How Did King Louis Xiv Help The State Prosper

    476 Words  | 1 Pages

    King Louis XIV was one of the most influential rulers of France during the 17th and 18th century. However, despite the fact that he believed his actions were intended to help the state prosper, he ruled arbitrarily and selfishly in his own interests overall. By using money to fund wars, dispersing political power, and revoking the Edict of Nantes, Louis left France struggling to reclaim order. His economic, political, and religious decisions eventually led to the devastation of France and its people because he was acting for himself and not for France.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Russia And Louis Xiv

    504 Words  | 2 Pages

    King Louis XIV staged demonstrations of sovereignty by having a third of a mile in his castle, in Versailles, be filled with artwork celebrating religious triumphs and royal triumphs. His garden also had several statues of the Greek god Apollo to recall his claim of being the “sun king” of France. He often invited nobles to stay with him a part of the year and the magnificence of his court was supposed to keep them from disobedience and increased their social prestige by associating them with himself. He managed to force the nobles to depend on the crown but did not seek to undermine their superior place in society. Nobles were excluded from paying taxes so a lot of the burden fell on to the peasants. In addition to raising land taxes he also created new taxes.

    Read More

  • King Louis Xiv Research Paper

    532 Words  | 2 Pages

    High taxation and an increasing royal power on authority had upset many of the people including nobles, aristocrats, and people of Parliament. This civil war taught the King of making sure to keep his people (poor and rich) in check or in the future he would face the same situation but with a different outcome. The King would use this as a learning tool in how he conducted his courts and daily routines. It was expected of higher ranking officials to want to be by the Kings side when he woke up, ate, and even got dressed. This was a small way of keeping the people who worked for him in check as it was considered an honor and privilege to be there at these times with the King. Louis was big on theatrics and making sure that all eyes were on him. One of his ploys when he was in power and Versailles had been built was to gather all of the nobility from all of France and invite them to stay with him at his palace year round. This seemingly innocent gesture was actually used to keep them there so that they could not be back at their estates potentially attempting to overthrow or start another civil war against the crown. King Louis’s deception tactics were very useful in keeping his nobility and country together, but his wars and expensive lifestyle is really what led to France’s power

    Read More

  • The Absolutism Of King Louis XIV

    518 Words  | 2 Pages

    After the occurrence of the Fronde, an open rebellion of the nobility to reduce the power of the king, Louis XIV realized that he could no longer trust his nobles. Because of this, Louis called for the construction of Versailles, a grand palace located outside of Paris. He ordered for all his court to live at Versailles so that they would lose interest in political power, having no need to rebel. This ...

    Read More

  • Comparing King Louis XIV of France and King Philip II of Spain

    478 Words  | 1 Pages

    King Louis XIV was a showy and self-absorbed king. His palace was representative of his personality and ideals. The Versailles palace architecture displayed Louis XIV ideals of secular issues. He cared more about spending money to show off his power. Unlike the Escorial, Versailles was centered on “The Sun King” instead of religion. At one point Louis XIV stated that “he was the state”. This statement was saying that Louis XIV represented the center and best of France. An example of this was that King Louis XIV lived in the middle of Versailles. Versailles was also very ornate and had the atmosphere of freeness. However, the Escorial was very basic like Philip II.

    Read More

  • The Economic Origins of the French Revolution

    2737 Words  | 6 Pages

    The inflated opinion the French monarchy had about themselves and other nobles lent itself to how they contributed to and handled the economic downturn in France for centuries prior to the French Revolution. Forming the foundation of many of France’s financial issues, the monarchial system granted royals and the nobles who surrounded them the ability to feel as if they are intended to be superior to the rest of France, a mentality that would last until the French Revolution began. With this monarchial system, each king of France from 1610 to 1789 would contribute in both positive and negative ways, depending greatly on the Chief Ministers they appointed. [ADD]

    Read More

  • “Moral Disagreement” by Kwame Anthony Appiah: Rhetorical Analysis

    591 Words  | 2 Pages

    Before the article, there is a summary about the author, Kwame Anthony Appiah. The summary describes things that Appiah has done, which includes writing several books and teaching at prestigious universities. The summary states: “He is the Laurence S. Rockefeller University Professor of Philosophy at the University Center for Human Values at Princeton University, where he teaches and does research in philosophy, ethics, and identity, African and African American cultural and literary studies, and the phil...

    Read More

  • The Most Successful Absolute Monarch in Europe was Louis XIV of France

    1549 Words  | 4 Pages

    Of all the absolute rulers in European history, Louis XIV of France was the most powerful, and the best example because of his successes, being able to continue his complete control even after failures, his ability to be able to use France’s money in any way he wanted, such as the Place of Versailles, taking away the nobles power, and his ability to delegate impotant jobs to smart yet loyal people.

    Read More

  • Political Testament of Cardinal Richelieu

    780 Words  | 2 Pages

    At the beginning of the 17th century, France was a place of internal strife and bickering bureaucrats. The king, Louis XIII, had come to the throne in 1610 at the age of nine, leaving the running of the kingdom to his mother, Marie de Medici. One of her court favorites, Armand de Plessis de Richelieu, rose through the ranks, eventually gaining the title of Cardinal and becoming one of Louis’ key advisors and minister. His political manifesto, Political Testament, was a treatise for King Louis XIII that offered him advice mainly concerned with the management and subtle subjugation of the nobles and the behavior of a prince. Beneath all of the obeisant rhetoric, Richelieu was essentially writing a handbook for Louis XIII on how to survive as a king in a political landscape increasingly dominated by the aristocracy. Richelieu’s ideology shows a pragmatic attitude reminiscent of The Prince, a political work by 15th century Florentine politician Niccoló Machiavelli.

    Read More

  • The Palace of Versailles and the Absolutism of Louis XIV

    1705 Words  | 4 Pages

    One of the most important elements of Versailles that affected Louis XIV’s reign was the use of propaganda. The Palace contained “paintings, statues, tapestries” (Page) and a general grandness that significantly promoted Louis’ name. Louis himself was a “prominent subject in the artwork” (Montclos 330) and was portrayed as handsome and god-like. Even in the aspects of the Palace where Louis wasn’t literally being represented, the grand nature of Versailles sent out a message that the King was living lavishly, and was therefore very powerful. Louis XIV used the grandiosity of his Palace and the art inside to promote himself to his people.

    Read More

  • How Did King Louis Abuse His Power

    256 Words  | 1 Pages

    Over the course of Louis’ rein, he showed that he was a bad monarch because he abused his power. Ultimately, he made the citizens unhappy. Louis believed that Kings “are born to possess all and command all” and their power should not be questioned. This caused him to make impulsive decisions without thinking of the citizens opinions because they were not supposed to question him. If his power was questioned Louis was quickly able to say that God gave him the power to make decisions therefore they were right.

    Read More

  • Madame de Pompadour and the Theaters of Power, by Thomas E. Kaiser

    1307 Words  | 3 Pages

    There was often a danger posed from being the King's favorite, oppositions could lead to trouble for the Mistress, and Madame de Pompadour experienced her fair share of opposition and resentment. According to Thomas Kaiser one of the main oppositions that Pompadour encountered was that of the queen's party, or parti...

    Read More

More about Louis XIV and His Court

Open Document