Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Kolb's learning styles inventory
Kolb's learning styles inventory
Kolb's learning styles inventory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Kolb's learning styles inventory
Learning How to Learn
There are four characteristics to Kolb’s learning style. They are divergers, convergers, accommodators and assimilators. Divergers are people whose strength lies in creative and imaginative ability. They excel in the ability to see concrete situations from many sides and to come up with a lot of ideas. Convergers are the opposite of divergers. Convergers use the practical application of ideas. They do best in a situation where there is one correct answer or solution and they can focus on same. Accommodators are good at carrying out plans and experiments. They also involve themselves in new experiences. They are risk takers and do well in situations that require quick decisions and adaptations. Assimilators are the opposite of accommodators. They have the ability to understand and create theories. Their learning style excels in inductive reasoning.
I think that I am a cross between an accommodator and a diverger. I tend to relate more, though, with the accommodator. I tok multiple tests on the web, and I scored high on concrete experience (CE) and active experimentation (AE). I also rated as a tactile or kinesthetic in other tests. These both carry remarkable characteristics that are very common to each other, and to me. I would totally have to agree with the tests, because both styles fit me perfectly.
There are good points and bad points to my learning characteristics. Once I was urethaning a bar, and the customer wanted a thicker finish on top. Instead of researching this, I applied several thick coats of urethane. It did not work. Urethane, when applied to thick, does not harden, but stays soft. I had to explain to the customer, show them the proper application, restrip the whole bar ...
... middle of paper ...
...e problem. It seems to come to me naturally. This benefits me tremendously in all of my lifes endeavors.
While the above characteristics work very well in my line of work, which I have proven, there is also a down side to it. I also match the characteristic which will cause me problems in class, unless I correct it. This is the taking of long tests or essays. I am terrible at this, and always have been. The solution to this problem is to apply another style of learning to this problem. I plan on applying the visual style the next time that I encounter this problem. Now that I know exactly what the problem is, I know that I can come to grips with it and apply the solution. When I follow through on with correcting this defect, it will have a tremendous impact on my life and business. There will be no limit as to the amount of success I will be able to achieve.
Matthew L. Sanders discusses the necessity of taking responsibility for one’s own education in a section of his book Becoming a Learner: Realizing the Opportunity of Education. In this section, Sanders explains how he initially blamed an instructor for not teaching him sufficiently and then learned that “No matter what kind of teacher you have, no matter what kind of class you are taking, if you are a learner you will set out to understand the material and create opportunities for success.” This statement is true and the concept can be applied through many methods to create success for students if they are willing to put forth effort.
My personality type leaned more towards that of an ESTJ. As an ESTJ, I have the tendency to be rigid and overly detailed. I notice that I am more like this with my family. My wife has pointed out to me that I am very rigid with our two children. I feel that there is a right way to do something and then there is a wrong way. Take for example if my son is writing his numbers the wrong way, I will show him how it should have been written. The Lord has helped me in this area as I am not so
I found Kolb's (1984) model of experiential learning a useful way to summarize the process if individual learning. The cycle begins when we each experience the world through our senses. Kolb calls this step ‘concreate experience', to indicate that he does not mean the various experiences we have through books or plays, but real-world experiences. Examples of concrete experience could be as varied as sitting through a boring meeting or suffering the distress of losing a job. Kolb suggest that to learn from our experiences we must engage in a second step of consistency reflecting on what has occurred. This step he calls ‘reflective observation'. We are able to reflect on much less than what occurred in the actual experience. Reflection is selective and influenced by our expectations. The third step in the learning cycle is making sense of what we have experience. In other words, ‘abstract conceptualization'. The final step in Kolb's model is ‘active experimentation'. At this step, we test out the meaning that we have constructed by taking action in the world – which then leads to new experiences. Kolb has shown that over time we tend to get more proficient at some steps of the process that at others, thus we develop a learning style preference. Kolb has noted all the steps are necessary, the smallest alteration to any of these steps can make the learning process less
Kolb’s learning cycle is used to break up the learning process into different stages, such as doing, reflecting, conceptualizing and experiencing (Kurian, 2013, p.162). The use of Kolb’s learning cycle (1984) has a wide impact on the advancements in learning. Within the four stages, the practitioner would have taken part in a task and would have noted down their observations. At this stage the practitioner would have begun to see the positives and negatives of the task that they have just carried out. From then on the practitioner will form new ideas from the observation notes. Later, being able to use these new ideas to plan their task effectively. Once the practitioner has implemented their task, for the second time with the new ideas. Kolb’s learning cycle (1984) begins again. However, Kolb’s model has been criticized due to the fact that it does not give a wide range of detail about the process of reflection, and lacks evidence. It can sometimes be seen as rigid and sequential (Trodd, 2012,
The learning styles of Honey and Mumford was based on the model of Kolb which identifies four distinct learning styles:
inclined towards introvert, 62% sensing, 9% thinking, and 16% judging. I was not all that
Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory (ELT) is a four part learning process that contains both behavioral and cognitive theory aspects (Spector, 2016). Behaviorism is defined by observing a learner’s actions and reactions to their environment to explain learning (Spector, 2016). According to Jonassen, behaviorism only focuses on what the learner can do and how behavioral dispositions are shaped by selective reinforcement, but behaviorism doesn’t include the learner’s mental capabilities (Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm?, 1991). The basic concept of ELT is “learning by doing”. This concept is similar to Papert’s constructionism.
of personality. Those types were extrovert and introvert. However, I can relate to my style of
Many people in history, as well as my mentors, have influenced my personal learning philosophy about early childhood learning.
As every personality test I take puts me in that category over others. Thankfully, the trait is highly admired in dentistry. logic allows me to be very analytical about issues at hand. I rarely panic, and try to find the fastest solution to problems. When reading I am able to pick up on the most important parts of the text, and implement the understanding into my everyday life. I am extremely organized which may have developed into slight OCD, so work environments with me are always in the best shape and their is little to no mishalf. Employees and practices would not have issues with patients because I am unfairly fair and reasonable. While I am selfish, I have morals that regard other people's take. It is natural for me to care for other people as the human I was made to be. I am not religious, but thankful I turned out as I
At any time in our lives, we have all encountered any number of professional environments. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the adult who has been in the workforce between 1978 and 2006 has held an average of 10.8 jobs (Bureau of Labor Statics, 2008). In such environments, one is bound to encounter both the most rewarding of working experiences, as well as difficult work experiences. In my history of different work environments, I grew more as an employee and had better relationships with my coworkers when I was in an environment that allowed and encouraged me to learn and solve problems, as opposed to in an environment that was rigid and did not foster any kind of personal growth .
The learning perspective what is it? This is the study of how exactly a person is effected through what they learn on a daily basis. Through family, their surroundings and behavior. The people who believe this line of thinking are called behaviorists. Many people look at the learning perspective in a suspiciouse manner not believeing or trusting any of the experiments. But there are many contributions and many limitations of the learning perspective.
Left Cerebral: Theorists, Left Limbic: Organizers, Right Limbic: Humanitarians, Right Cerebral: Innovators As Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) enthusiasts might speculate, there is a correlation between MBTI preference and HBDI preference. These two models focus on characterizing learners. There has been much further work in characterizing the Cognitive Styles of different learners, such as the work of Furnham (1995) and Ramsden (1992) on Whole/Analytic organization and processing of information, and Verbal/Imagery representation of information. However, there is some debate about whether Cognitive Style should be considered part of Learning Style: “LS are more in terms of processes than outcomes” (Duff, 2003, pp.5). Sadler-Smith (2001) also brings out in their discussion that Cognitive Style and LS are independent.
Wow! I have a personal learning style! If I had given any thought to my learning style prior to this course, I would have said simply, “Some things are easy for me to learn, and some things are not.” Now I can say, “I am a grouper, a top-down learner, an owl, in the C-D quadrants, and my strong intelligences are linguistic, intrapersonal, and interpersonal”. What all this means, still, is some things are easy for me to learn, and some things are not. But there I go again, simplifying the matter.
There are several different ways in which one learns. One way to learn is by adapting the cognitive style which sets a structure that one should go through a process of perceiving, thinking, problem solving and remembering. James Poon identifies two different types of learning approaches associated with the cognitive theory, reflective and impulsive. “Reflective individuals tend to be analytical, cautious, accurate, and slow in their approach to problem solving” (66). Poon also says that “reflective individuals are found to be an effective predictor of an academic achievement in first grade...