One major purpose of works of fiction, whether they be prose, poetry, or plays, is to transport their audience to another time, to another place, somewhere beyond where they sit or stand or lie. That, after all, is why there is a distinction between fiction and nonfiction. This purpose holds true even in the case of a historical play like Richard III, which is based on actual happenings. However, in seeming contrast to this purpose is the principle of Aristotle’s three unities, which is to “make a plot more plausible, more true-to-life, and thus to follow Aristotle’s concept of mimesis, i.e., the attempt to imitate or reflect life as authentically as possible” by making sure there is a sense of cohesiveness – thus, the three unities (Lethbridge). While strict adherence to these three guidelines may have worked for the Ancient Greeks, they are not necessarily what is best for modern works – or as modern as Shakespeare is given the context. This is seen in Richard III, in which Shakespeare disregards the Aristotelian unities of time and place while adhering thoroughly to the unity of action, and this particular application of the unities, rather than detracting from the play as a unified whole, only serves to strengthen the play’s themes and plotline.
While the three unities of time, place, and action are conventionally solely attributed to Aristotle, in actuality, Aristotle largely emphasized only the unity of action, providing mere suggestions as to time and place. The other two unities, in turn, were built upon by three Italian critics in the mid- to late-sixteenth century: Giraldi Cinthio, Vincenzo Maggi, and Lodovico Castelvetro (Frye 329). Between 1540 and 1545, Cinthio proposed limiting a drama to a single day, and in 1550,...
... middle of paper ...
...Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007. 337. Print.
Kirby, Michael. "On Style." The Drama Review: TDR. 3rd ed. Vol. 15. Cambridge: MIT, 1971. 11-19. Print.
LaBlanc, Michael L, ed. "Richard III." Shakespearean Criticism. Vol. 73. Detroit: Gale, 2003. Literature Resource Center. Web. 12 Mar. 2014
Lethbridge, Stepfanie, and Jarmila Mildorf. Basics of English Studies: Drama. N.p.: University of Tübingen, Mar. 2004. PDF.
Pearce, Brian. "Shakespeare and the Unities." Shakespeare in Southern Africa. Vol. 12. N.p.: n.p., 1999. 42-46. Print.
Schafer, B. L. "A Study of the Three Unities in Shakespeare's Representative Plays." The Sewanee Review. 1st ed. Vol. 25. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1917. 65-73. Print.
Shakespeare, William, G. Blakemore Evans, and J. J. M. Tobin. "The Tragedy of Richard the Third." The Riverside Shakespeare. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1997. 752-94. Print.
Shakespeare constructs King Richard III to perform his contextual agenda, or to perpetrate political propaganda in the light of a historical power struggle, mirroring the political concerns of his era through his adaptation and selection of source material. Shakespeare’s influences include Thomas More’s The History of King Richard the Third, both constructing a certain historical perspective of the play. The negative perspective of Richard III’s character is a perpetuation of established Tudor history, where Vergil constructed a history intermixed with Tudor history, and More’s connection to John Morton affected the villainous image of the tyrannous king. This negative image is accentuated through the antithesis of Richards treachery in juxtaposition of Richmond’s devotion, exemplified in the parallelism of ‘God and Saint George! Richmond and victory.’ The need to legitimize Elizabeth’s reign influenced Shakespeare’s portra...
Clark, W.G., and W. Aldis Wirhgt, eds. The Complete Works of William Shakespeare. Vol 2. USA: Nd. 2 vols.
Levin, Harry. General Introduction. The Riverside Shakespeare. Ed. G. Blakemore Evans. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1974.
Galens, David, and Lynn M. Spampinato, eds. Drama for Students. Vol. 2. Detroit: Gale, 1998. Print.
Mowat, Barbara A. and Paul Werstine, ed. Introduction. Shakespeare: Othello. New York: Washington Square Press, 1993.
Galens, David, ed. Drama for Students "resenting Analysis, Cntext and Critism on Commonly Studied Drama" . Vol. Volume 1. Detroit : Gale Research , 1998 .
Shakespeare, William. The Three-Text Hamlet. Eds. Paul Bertram and Bernice Kliman. New York: AMS Press, 1991.
Mowat, Barbara A. and Paul Werstine, ed. Introduction. Shakespeare: Othello. New York: Washington Square Press, 1993.
Written during a time of peace immediately following the conclusion of the War of the Roses between the Yorks and the Lancasters, William Shakespeare’s play Richard III showcases a multi-faceted master of linguistic eloquence, Richard, Duke of Gloucester, a character who simultaneously manages to be droll, revolting, deadly, yet fascinating. Richard's villainy works in a keen, detestable manner, manifesting itself in his specific use or, rather, abuse of rhetoric. He spends a substantial amount of time directly interacting and therefore breaking the fourth wall and orating to the audience in order to forge a relationship with them, to make members not only his confidants of murderous intentions, but also his accomplices and powerless, unwilling cohorts to his wrongdoings. Through the reader’s exploration of stylistic and rhetorical stratagem in the opening and final soliloquies delivered by Richard, readers are able to identify numerous devices which provide for a dramatic effect that make evident the psychological deterioration and progression of Richard as a character and villain.
Shakespeare, William. Richard III. The Norton Shakespeare. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt. (New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1997), 515-600.
Dutton, R., & Howard, J.E. (2003). A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works.(p. 9) Maiden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
James, D.G. (Excerpt from a series of lectures delivered in 1965 at University College, London.) The Shakespeare Criticism Volume 8. Gale Research Inc., Detroit. 1989: 429-434.
Cohen, Walter, J.E. Howard, K. Eisaman Maus. The Norton Shakespeare. Vol. 2 Stephen Greenblatt, General Editor. New York, London. 2008. ISBN 978-0-393-92991-1
Clark, W. G. and Wright, W. Aldis , ed. The Complete Works of William Shakespeare. Vol. 1. New York: Nelson-Doubleday
Worthen, William B. Modern Drama and the Rhetoric of Theater. Berkeley: U of California P, 1992.