Risks, the Effects and Affected
At some point in our lives, we have all experience some form of risk either a systematic or idiosyncratic risks. According to authors, Stephen G. Cecchetti and Kermit L. Schoenholt’z book, Money, Banking, Financial Markets, “Risk is everywhere. It comes in many forms and from almost everywhere imaginable place. All risks can be classified into one of two groups: (1) those affecting a small number of people but no one else (unique or idiosyncratic risks) and (2) those affecting everyone (systematic or economy wide risks) (ch.5 p.110).” The main point of this paper is to investigate systematic and idiosyncratic risks, what causes each to occur and how they can be eliminated if possible.
What are Risks?
A systematic risk or economy wide risks is believe to be the worst of the types of risks because it cannot be avoided and it can also be very detrimental to governments, firms and households making it much harder to recover from the losses. There are also “macroeconomic factors, such as swings in consumer and business confidence brought on by global economics conditions or changes in the political climate. For History tells us that when oil prices rise, auto sales fall, and the automobile industry suffers (ch.5 p.111).” Another famous example of an economy wide risks is the Housing Bubble Crisis. In 2008, the economy experience a recession that left behind in its wake thousands of people having their homes foreclosed and homeless. Many people also lost their jobs and lifesavings due to businesses losing profits sending the unemployment rate to 10 percent. Some companies could not sustain the downturn of the economy like the Lehman Brothers. Forbes’s magazine author Steve Schaefer’s article, The Great...
... middle of paper ...
...easure risks is lesson we all can learn from and use in
our daily financial transactions. Although, you make not be able to avoid a systematic or
economy wide risks because it happens to all firms, government and households we can reduce
personal risk or idiosyncratic risks by spreading the risks simply just not keeping “all of eggs in
one basket (ch.5 p.112).” I think the government of the U.S. should take precautions to ensure
that systematic risks are not deadly to society.
References
Schaefer, Steve (2011). The Great Recession's Biggest Bankrupties:Where Are They Now? Forbes.com
Cecchetti, S. G.and Schoenholtz, K. L. (2014). Money,Banking, And Financial Markets. New York McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Katz, Ian and Tracer, Zachary and Buhayar, Noah. (2014). Berkshire Is Said to Face Start of U.S. Systemic-Risk Scrutiny. Bloomberg.com
He defines each of these risks, as well as gives a few examples of each one. He quickly jumps into how many tend to focus on standard deviation as the only single metric calculation, rather than recognizing there are other ways to do so. The author discourages the focus on just one risk, because all are intertwined together and rely on one another. By focusing on only one risk, for example peer risk, it leaves the company up for even more risk in its assets and pension obligations. Figure 1 illustrates that these risks do indeed rely on one another.
Just as the great depression, a booming economy had been experienced before the global financial crisis. The economy was growing at a faster rtae bwteen 2001 and 2007 than in any other period in the last 30 years (wade 2008 p23). An vast amount of subprime mortgages were the backbone to the financial collapse, among several other underlying issues. As with the great depression, there would be a number of factors that caused such a devastating economic
The financial crisis of 2007–2008 is considered by many economists the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s. This crisis resulted in the threat of total collapse of large financial institutions, the bailout of banks by national governments, and downturns in stock markets around the world. The crisis led to a series of events including: the 2008–2012 global recessions and the European sovereign-debt crisis. The reasons of this financial crisis are argued by economists. The performance of the Federal Reserve becomes a focal point in this argument.
financial risk is greater than it used to be, and (c) that financial difficulty is further compounded
The presence of systemic risk in the current United States financial system is undeniable. Systemic risks exist when the failure of one firm may topple others and destabilize the entire financial system. The firm is then "too big to fail," or perhaps more precisely, "too interconnected to fail.” The Federal Stability Oversight Council is charged with identifying systemic risks and gaps in regulation, making recommendations to regulators to address threats to financial stability, and promoting market discipline by eliminating the expectation that the US federal government will come to the assistance of firms in financial distress. Systemic risks can come through multiple forms, including counterparty risk on other financial ...
It can be argued that the economic hardships of the great recession began when interest rates were lowered by the Federal Reserve. This caused a bubble in the housing market. Housing prices plummeted, home prices plummeted, then thousands of borrowers could no longer afford to pay on their loans (Koba, 2011). The bubble forced banks to give out homes loans with unreasonably high risk rates. The response of the banks caused a decline in the amount of houses purchased and “a crisis involving mortgage loans and the financial securities built on them” (McConnell, 2012 p.479). The effect on the economy was catastrophic and caused a “pandemic” of foreclosures that effected tens of thousands home owners across the U.S. (Scaliger, 2013). The debt burden eventually became unsustainable and the U.S. crisis deepened as the long-term effect on bank loans would affect not only the housing market, but also the job market.
...ults of the recession. In order for this never to happen again, there is a need to learn from the mistakes in the past and to look for the warning signs. The problem is not just restricted to one country, but is a global problem and needs to be addressed as such.
Rousmaniere, Peter. “Facing a tough situation.” Risk & Insurance 17.7 (June 2006): 24-25. Expanded Academic ASAP. Web. 23 March 2011.
Long term viability and lowering the risk of any possible action – the solution must be advantageous in the long run with the least amount of risk involved instead of just achieving short term cost advantages.
The "subprime crises" was one of the most significant financial events since the Great Depression and definitely left a mark upon the country as we remain upon a steady path towards recovering fully. The financial crisis of 2008, became a defining moment within the infrastructure of the US financial system and its need for restructuring. One of the main moments that alerted the global economy of our declining state was the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers on Sunday, September 14, 2008 and after this the economy began spreading as companies and individuals were struggling to find a way around this crisis. (Murphy, 2008) The US banking sector was first hit with a crisis amongst liquidity and declining world stock markets as well. The subprime mortgage crisis was characterized by a decrease within the housing market due to excessive individuals and corporate debt along with risky lending and borrowing practices. Over time, the market apparently began displaying more weaknesses as the global financial system was being affected. With this being said, this brings into question about who is actually to assume blame for this financial fiasco. It is extremely hard to just assign blame to one individual party as there were many different factors at work here. This paper will analyze how the stakeholders created a financial disaster and did nothing to prevent it as the credit rating agencies created an amount of turmoil due to their unethical decisions and costly mistakes.
If financial markets are instable, it will lead to sharp contraction of economic activity. For example, in this most recent financial crisis, a deterioration in financial institutions’ balance sheets, along with asset price decline and interest rate hikes increased market uncertainty thus, worsening what is called ‘adverse selection and moral hazard’. This is a serious dilemma created before business transactions occur which information is misleading and promotes doing business with the ‘most undesirable’ clients by a financial institution. In turn, these ‘most undesirable’ clients later engage in undesirable behavior. All of this leads to a decline in economic activity, more adverse selection and moral hazards, a banking crisis and further declining in economic activity. Ultimately, the banking crisis came and unanticipated price level increases and even further declines in economic activity.
In conclusion, we feel that the recommendation we have suggested in this report is a suitable foundation to build a sustainable and prudent financial system in this country. This will facilitate the financial industry both, withdraw out of this crisis and in the future avoid as much as possible inducing the scale of matters at present. As the report suggest, everyone contributed in their own miniscule way to this crisis, we feel that it’s up to every one of us to contribute to the overall recovery of this financial crises and recovery of the nation in general.
Operational risks are risks that may occur in the day to day activities, which may involve the process, systems, or people. Strategic risks are those risks involved with strategy. Positioning ones’ company with the right alliances and competing with fare prices will help affect future operational decisions. Compliance risks involve the many legislations and regulations a company must follow. The results could lead to high penalties and a company’s reputation could take a hit. Lastly, financial risks are always being monitored because oil, fuel, and currency rates are constantly fluctuating. By monitoring the fluctuating rates determines fare cost and balancing of the budget. “Like in any other industry, the risk exposure quantifies the amount of loss that might occur from any particular activity” (Genovese,
As has been discussed before, risk identification plays an important part in the risk such as unique, subjective, complex and uncertainly. There are no two identical leaves in the world; similar, there are no two exactly the same risk either. Hence the best risk manger could not identify risk completely. Besides, risk identification assessment is done by risk analysts. As the different level of risk management knowledge, practical experience and other aspects between individuals, the result of risk identification may be difference. Furthermore, the process of identifying risk is still risky. Once risks have been identified, corporations have to take actions on limiting risky actions to reduce the frequency and severity of risky. They have to think about any lost profit from limiting distribution of risky action. So reducing risk identification risk is one of assessments in the risk
The company recognizes that it is subject to both market and industry risks. We believe our risks are as follows, and we are addressing each as indicated.