Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of Bill Clinton's Oklahoma City Bombing Speech
Public response to the Oklahoma city bombing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Do you remember where you were on April 9th 1995? Videos clips flickered images of a crumbling collapsing building. Body bags amassed high next to ambulances. Lachrymose mothers pulled up to the scene hoping and praying that it wasn’t their son. Where were you on the day of the Oklahoma City Bombing? Do you remember hanging on to every word in President Clinton’s speech? Do you remember the feeling of nationalism that overpowered you? Do you remember the hated you felt for the man who had done this to your nation?
Yet, how many remember the massacre of the Evangelical Christian group in Waco, Texas? No video clips flashed images of the 82 body bags, 25 of them containing children, piled high in the city morgue, no ambulances in sight. President Clinton didn’t address it; nationalism didn’t over power the American nation. Many of us have never even heard about this massacre, until one man, one American, spoke out about it. Although the Oklahoma City Bombing was an inexcusable act of terrorism, Timothy McVeigh, the bomber, reasoning reflects the voice of many Americans. Those who feel they have no voice, those who feel they have no say in what the government does, those who feel “ American citizens have to be vigilant to keep the government under control (qtd. in Vidal 83).”
The Oklahoma City bombing will forever be remembered as a day of the start of the controversial war. On April 19th 1995, a truck maneuvered into the parking lot of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Office in downtown Oklahoma City. Inside sat Timothy McVeigh, a former Army solider, with the intentions of punishing the government for their actions (Michal and Herbeck 68). As he contemplated his next move, Timothy McVeigh thought to himself, “‘dirty for dirt...
... middle of paper ...
...012.
Clinton, William. “Tragedy of Oklahoma City 15 years Later and the Lessons for Today.” Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. June 2003: Web. 8 Feb. 2012.
Hamma, Mark S. In Bad Company: America's Terriorist Underground. Boston: Northeastern UP, 2001: Print.
Kelley, Ed. “Oklahoma City Bombing.” World Book Advanced. Dec. 2008: 5-6 World Book. Web. 2 Feb. 2012.
Michel, Lou and Dan Herbeck. American Terrorist: Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City Bombing. New York: Harper Collins World, 2001. Print.
Steigher, Brad and Sherry Steigher. “ Oklahoma City Bombing.”Oklahoma City Articles. Points of View Refenece Center. EBSCO. Web. 8 Feb. 2012.
Vidal, Gore. Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace: How We Got So Hated. New York: Thunders Mouth/Nation, 2002. Print.
Wilentz, Sean. “When leaders Change History.” Newsweek. 16 July. 2001: 26, World Book. Web. 8 Feb. 2012.
On April 19, 1995 two former US Soldiers blew up a the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, killing over 150 people. Bill Clinton, President of the United States at that time, wrote a speech where he shared his sympathy for the friends and family of victims and united the country through his use of parallelism, patriotic language, and inclusive wording.
by the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. The two men in which didn't even know the
Linenthal, Edward Tabor. The Unfinished Bombing: Oklahoma City in American Memory. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2001. Print.
Wheeler, Tim. "McVeigh could tell some tales." People's Weekly World [New York] 26 May 2001, National
A review of Timothy McVeigh and the bombing of the Alfred P Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City reveal that McVeigh grew up the All-American boy, who grew increasingly dissatisfied with the level of governmental control of individual’s freedoms and constitutional rights specifically the Second Amendment which afforded citizens the right to bear arms. A known gun collector and survivalist, McVeigh taking direction from the novel “The Turner Diaries” grew more paranoid in his perception of the government’s stance on gun control and the anti-semitic views expressed by the novel’s neo-Nazi author William Pierce who wrote of race wars and the bombing of a federal building. (BIO).
Jeffrey David Simon, The Terrorist Trap: America's Experience with Terrorism, 2nd ed. (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2001), 188-89.
Manning, William A (1993). The World Trade Center bombing: Report and analysis. Emmitsburg, Md.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, United States Fire Administration, National Fire Data Center.
On September 11, 2001, America was forever changed. On this day, America faced the biggest terrorist attack that had ever been carried out; thousands of people lost their lives that day. Throughout the sadness and mourning of this terrible event, George Bush addressed the nation with one of the most memorable speeches. When President Bush addressed the nation, he stated that America is strong and they could try to bring us down, but we will not be broken.This speech gave hope to many Americans and helped them remember to stay strong. This day will be forever remembered for all the souls that lost their lives and the brave people who threatened their own life to save others.
Host: On September the 11th 2001, the notorious terror organisation known as Al-Qaeda struck at the very heart of the United States. The death count was approximately 3,000; a nation was left in panic. To this day, counterterrorism experts and historians alike regard the event surrounding 9/11 as a turning point in US foreign relations. Outraged and fearful of radical terrorism from the middle-east, President Bush declared that in 2001 that it was a matter of freedoms; that “our very freedom has come under attack”. In his eyes, America was simply targeted because of its democratic and western values (CNN News, 2001). In the 14 years following this pivotal declaration, an aggressive, pre-emptive approach to terrorism replaced the traditional
On the first day after the Twin Towers fell, when the skies were silent and the country cried, a sense of patriotism was greatly increased and appreciated. Many people came from several different countries, with many different skills, but everyone who came all had one
When a giant explosion ripped through Alfred P. Murrah federal building April 19,1995, killing 168 and wounding hundreds, the United States of America jumped to a conclusion we would all learn to regret. The initial response to the devastation was all focused of middle-eastern terrorists. “The West is under attack,”(Posner 89), reported the USA Today. Every news and television station had the latest expert on the middle east telling the nation that we were victims of jihad, holy war. It only took a few quick days to realize that we were wrong and the problem, the terrorist, was strictly domestic. But it was too late. The damage had been done. Because America jumped to conclusions then, America was later blind to see the impending attack of 9/11. The responsibility, however, is not to be placed on the America people. The public couldn’t stand to hear any talk of terrorism, so in turn the White House irresponsibly took a similar attitude. They concentrated on high public opinion and issues that were relevant to Americans everyday. The government didn’t want to deal with another public blunder like the one in Oklahoma City. A former FBI analyst recalls, “when I went to headquarters (Washington, D.C.) later that year no one was interested in hearing anything about Arab money connections unless it had something to do with funding domestic groups. We stumbled so badly on pinpointing the Middle East right off the bat on the Murrah bombing. No one wanted to get caught like that again,”(Posner 90). The result saw changes in the counter terrorism efforts; under funding, under manning, poor cooperation between agencies, half-hearted and incompetent agency official appointees and the list goes on. All of these decisions, made at the hands of the faint-hearted, opened the doors wide open, and practically begged for a terrorist attack. So who’s fault is it? The public’s for being
Schorn, Daniel. "The Explosion At Texas City - 60 Minutes - CBS News." CBS News. 29 Oct. 2006. Web. 27 June 2010.
When the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2011 rocked New York City, Pennsylvania, and Washington D.C., the word “tragedy” was used on a grandiose level around the world. For the people who lived close enough to experience the events first-hand, they may not have even called it a tragedy; perhaps they called it a misfortune, retaliation, lack of a strong government, unreal, or maybe even rebirth. In the coming years after the attacks, everything between standing united as a nation to declaring a war had flourished; but how has that left us - the land that has no distinct ethnicity - feel about each other? Why is it that fear is usually missing in the affective mnemonics of memorial sites, which, after all, are signifiers of some of the most horrific violence in human history? Do memorials dedicated to these attacks bring us together in terms of understanding, or is it just continual collective grief? This paper will cover the global complexity of the 9/11 attacks, the Empty Sky 9/11 Memorial in Liberty State Park, NJ, and factors and theories that memorials do influence a sense of complexity. The ground of public memory is always in motion, shifting with the tectonics of national identity. I chose the Empty Sky 9/11 Memorial as my topic of observation as I, personally, visit a few times throughout the year to pay respects to people I personally knew who perished in the attacks to the World Trade Center. I was in the 5th grade when this happened, and had absolutely no clue what was going on until my father did not return home until two days later with a bandage wrapped around his head and his devastating recollection of what happened just before he arrived to his job. The emotions that I feel within myself compared to others will...
Margulies, Joseph. 2013. What Changed When Everything Changed: 9/11 and the Making of National Identity. Yale University Press.
The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on America divided two nations, yet knit one closer like the attacks on Pearl Harbor. There were many events that lead up to 9/11 that were only the beginning. The attacks on the World Trade Center in 2001 was the finale. George Bush wrote in his diary, “The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century happened today…” (George Bush). This attack was a surprise, just like Pearl Harbor, but the U.S. reacted swiftly and effectively. The appalling events Now, more than a decade later, the 9/11 attacks still affect our life today.