Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
reflection on change management
reflection on change management
initiating and managing change
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: reflection on change management
Throughout every organization is an opportunity to introduce new change. Change can have a positive or negative impact on the surrounding environment, both internally and externally. Implementing a change requires adjustments to the status quo, sometimes leading to employees that are directly affected by the change to feel threatened. Change can also produce positive reactions, such as boosting morale, increasing profits, or decreasing costs. A new change in an environment must be carefully planned out, to ensure that the expected results are achieved while maintaining all other processes at an acceptable level.
There are several factors that contribute to improving change management within a data center of any firm. According to Dennis Powell, these factors are, (1) change scheduling, (2) process automation, (3) best practice/process automation, (4) dedicated testing environment, and (5) dedication to the completeness of tests (Powell, 2009). Powell goes on to explain that when these factors are implemented, it produces a positive impact on service downtime and operations. Reinforcing that a mature change management process is vital, Powell cites that “change implementation has become the number one cause of downtime, with 10% of all changes on average rolled back from production due to problems that can’t be resolved.” With a proper change management infrastructure in place, firms can avoid some of the common pitfalls of introducing change to an organization.
In terms of supporting change within the legal industry, Gerry Riskin outlines seven rules for creating change in the firm. Riskin makes a bold statement that by following the rules of change, it will “catapult your firm forward” (Riskin, 2006, p. 28). One of ...
... middle of paper ...
...nization is much more effective than from bottom up. Careful planning and execution, along with considering the majority of expectations, will lead to a successful implementation of change.
Works Cited
A Real-World Look At Data Center Relocation. (2009). Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.
Luftman, J., & Bullen, C., & Liao, D., & Nash, E., & Neumann, C. (2004). Managing the Information Technology Recource: Leadership in the Information Age. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Powell, D. (2009). Top 5 Factors that Affect Change Management in the Data Center. Data Center Journal.
Riskin, G. (2006). The Seven Immutable Laws of Change Management: A Catalyst for Managing Partners Who Aspire to Move Their Firms Forward. EDGE International Review. Summer 2006.
Senge, P. (2006). The Fifth Discipline. New York, New York: Doubleday/Currency.
Leading Change was named the top management book of the year by Management General. There are three major sections in this book. The first section is ¡§the change of problem and its solution¡¨ ; which discusses why firms fail. The second one is ¡§the eight-stage process¡¨ that deals with methods of performing changes. Lastly, ¡§implications for the twenty-first century¡¨ is discussed as the conclusion. The eight stages of process are as followed: (1) Establishing a sense of urgency. (2) Creating the guiding coalition. (3) Developing a vision and a strategy. (4) Communicating the change of vision. (5) Empowering employees for broad-based action. (6) Generating short-term wins. (7) Consolidating gains and producing more changes. (8) Anchoring new approaches in the culture.
Change is the only constant in life. And therefore it should be understood as part of a continuing work in progress that calls for a much broader canvas that seeks out competing voices, and works with the resulting ambiguities, contradictions and tensions of messy reality (Graetz, F. & Smith, A., 2010). In this submission I try to show that organizational change is majorly based on the environment surrounding it much more than the desire of the members or change agents working in that organization. This view diverts from that of Lippitt, (1958) who suggests that implementing planned organizational changes successfully depends on premeditated interventions intended to modify the functioning of an organization. It also diverts from the traditional approaches to organizational change that generally follow a linear, rational model in which the focus is on controllability under the stewardship of a strong leader or ‘guiding coalition (Collis, 1998). In this discussion therefore, comparison made between the different philosophies of change and I try to show that successful change implantation largely depends on an organizations appreciation of what goes on around it rather than what they have planned as a strategic direction.
This paper will be broken down into six sections profiling each critical part of implementing and managing change in an organization. The sections included are; outline for plan creating urgency, the approach to attracting a guiding team, a critique of the organizational profile, the components of change, and how to empower the organization.
Change is inevitable and bound to happen in all aspects of life including business. Although change is important in an organization, it can also be seen as a strength and weakness. Effective leadership is about mastering change. One must be willing to change in order to grow and be successful. This paper will compare and contrast Kotter and Kurt Lewin step in their change management models. Furthermore, it will elaborate on the concepts and explain whether these methods can be used at the same time. In addition, this paper will include a Christian worldview of the information discussed and how it relates to the change management models.
Change is a fundamental element of individuals, groups and all sorts of organizations. As it is the case for individuals, groups and societies, where change is a continuous process, composed of an indefinite amount of smaller sub-changes that vary in effect and length, and is affected by all sorts of aspects and events, many of which cyclic are anticipated ones. It is also the case for organizations, where change occurs repeatedly during the life cycle of organizations. Yet change in organizations is not as anticipated nor as predictable, with unexpected internal and external variables and political forces that can further complicate the management of change (Andriopoulos, C. and P. Dawson, 2009), which is by itself, the focus of many scholars in their pursuit to shed light on and facilitate the change process (Kotter 1996; Levin 1947; et al).
Kotter, JP 1995, Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. In Harvard Business Review on Change, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.
Change initiatives are time intensive and exorbitant, which portentously influence an organization’s push toward success. And almost fifty percent of these initiatives are unsuccessful. Given that the certainty of change is inevitable, organizations will be required to determine how to effectively acclimate and endure change. Each tactical change in plans organizations are produced via programs and developments, and thriving organizations manage change by managing their developments and programs effectively.
Kotter, J. P & Schlesinger, L. (2008). ‘Choosing strategies for change’. Harvard Business Review, July-August, 130-139.
Change should be seen as a challenge and embraced with enthusiasm (Marquis & Huston, 2012). In my professional and personal life, I view and respond to change as a way to make improvements to existing regulations and circumstances. I embark upon the quest with determination to succeed at whatever task is presented to me. Life without change can become unchallenging and stagnant (Marquis & Huston, 2012). As society and technology advance, you must incorporate the necessary transformations that arise with it.
It is therefore important to include various perspectives in approaching the change in an organization: bottom-up, top-down and peer-to-peer approaches will intersect and interact to create profound change – or the change will not be sustained.
Pascale, Richard and Linda Gioja. “Changing the Way we Change.'; Harvard Business Review, Vol. 75, No. 6, Nov-Dec 1997, p. 126.
The change process within any organization can prove to be difficult and very stressful, not only for the employees but also for the management team. Hayes (2014), highlights seven core activities that must take place in order for change to be effective: recognizing the need for change, diagnosing the change and formulating a future state, planning the desired change, implementing the strategies, sustaining the implemented change, managing all those involved and learning from the change. Individually, these steps are comprised of key actions and decisions that must be properly addressed in order to move on to the next step. This paper is going to examine how change managers manage the implementation of change and strategies used
Change Management is not impossibly difficult. It need detailed planning, including everyone affected, frequent interaction, accomplish a perspicuous target for the change and a method of measuring success, complete the plan, and strengthen the change once it is in place.
One of the first scholars to describe the process of organizational change was Lewin (1974). He described change as a three-stage process that consists of unfreezing, moving and freezing stage. During the unfreezing stage the organizations become motivated to change by some event or objective. The moving stage is like implementation when the organization actually makes the necessary change. Furthermore the freezing stage is reached when the change becomes permanent. Organizational change has also...