Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
comprehensive sex education vs abstinence
sex education pros and cons
Implementation of Sex Education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: comprehensive sex education vs abstinence
Our children are growing up quicker than they ever have in the past; consequently their minds are growing more and more curious. Teenage pregnancy has been a key topic for discussion for far too long with little to no action being taken to prevent such pregnancies. Many people consider that something different needs to be done in regards to the way our children perceive sexual education. There have always been disputes about which type of sexual education should be taught in U.S. public schools. There have been many studies conducted to determine which courses are more effective in preventing teenage pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (STD’s). Though there are hundreds of curriculums out there only two major options have been utilized in our schools; comprehensive sex education (CSE) and abstinence-only education (AOE). These two alternatives differ from each other greatly, as do the people who support them. Though these are the two most popular courses, the one that has been favored for a very long time is abstinence-only education. Being federally funded for well over a few decades; AOE has had a number of advantages over CSE programs. The results however, have not been so prodigious. You see, every day more and more teenagers become sexually active, and every day you hear more about “teen moms”. It is apparent that teenage pregnancy is becoming a vastly growing "fad" in today's society, and many people including myself, suspect that this can be blamed on the lack of comprehensive sex education in schools. Teenage pregnancy went up by nearly five percent from 2005 to 2007. This is a big deal because when an adolescent becomes pregnant it is a huge health risk for her, the baby, and society in general. Many cases of ST... ... middle of paper ... ... Follow-Up." Journal of School Health 76.8 (ND): 414-422. Academic Search Premier. Web. 20 Nov. 2013. Frits, Gregory K. "Teenage Pregnancy: a Disturbing Trend." Brown University Child & Adolescent Behavior Letter26.1 (2010): 8. Academic Search Premier. Web. 20 Nov. 2013. Hall, David W., and Kathrin F. Stanger-Hall. "Abstinence-Only Education and Teen Pregnancy Rates: Why We Need Comprehensive Sex Education in the U.S." PLoS ONE 6.10 (2011): 1-11. Academic Search Premier. Web. 20 Nov. 2013. Miller, Monica K., and Dana A. Weiser. "Barack Obama vs Bristol Palin: Why the President's Sex Education Policy Wins." Contemporary Justice Review 13.4 (2010): 411-424. Academic Search Premier. Web. 20 Nov. 2013. Rajani, Nicole, and Naomi Starkman. "The Case for Comprehensive Sex Education." AIDS Patient Care & STDs 16.7 (2002): 313-318. Academic Search Premier. Web. 20 Nov. 2013.
Elliott, Emma. "Abstinence Sex Education Reduces Teen Sexual Activity." Teens at Risk. Ed. Auriana Ojeda. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Opposing Viewpoints.
Today’s young Americans face strong peer pressure to be sexually active and engage themselves in risky behaviors (Merino 100-109). Anyone deciding to have sex must first think about all the risks involved. Kekla Magoon, author of Sex Education in Schools, says that “half of all teens aged 15 to 19 years old in the United States have had sex” (Magoon 64-65). It is currently not required by federal law for schools to teach Sex education and those few schools that do teach Sex education have the decision to determine how much information is allowed. Advocates from both sides of the Sex education debate agree that teens need positive influences in order to make practical decisions (Magoon 88-89). Opponents of Abstinence-only education believe it fails because it does not prepare teens for all the risks of sex (Magoon 64-65).
Collins, Chris, Priya Alagiri, and Todd Summers. "Abstinence Only vs. Comprehensive Sex Education: What Are the Arguments? What Is the Evidence?" AIDS Research Institute. University of California, San Francisco, Mar. 2002. Web. 19 Feb. 2011. .
Since the HIV/AIDS epidemic began in the U.S. in the early 1980s the issue of sex education for American youth has had the attention of the nation. There are about 400,000 teen births every year in the U.S, with about 9 billion in associated public costs. STI contraction in general, as well as teen pregnancy, have put the subject even more so on the forefront of the nation’s leading issues. The approach and method for proper and effective sex education has been hotly debated. Some believe that teaching abstinence-only until marriage is the best method while others believe that a more comprehensive approach, which includes abstinence promotion as well as contraceptive information, is necessary. Abstinence-only program curriculums disregard medical ethics and scientific accuracy, and have been empirically proven to be ineffective; therefore, comprehensive sex education programs which are medically accurate, science-based and empirically proven should be the standard method of sex education for students/children in the U.S.
Not only expecting the reader to share the same idea that comprehensive sex education is the more beneficial alternative, the authors also believe the reader considers the rate of teenage pregnancy in our country as a bad thing and that there needs to be some sort of action to decrease it. To assume that the reader believes teen pregnancy is bad is a safe assumption to make. Culturally, in the United States, teen pregnancy is not the norm. Although it may be safe to assume that teen pregnancy itself is bad, it is not as safe to assume that abstinence-only education is completely ineffective. Like the authors sated, there could be a lot of opposition to teaching middle school and high school students how to properly use contraception. Many people reason that showing students how to safely and knowledgably prevent pregnancies and STDs will only increase sexual behavior among teenagers (1). In addition to the warrants the authors make, the backing used to support their assumption that abstinence-only education is not effective is in the form of national data on the public opinion of adults that support comprehensive sex education programs. 82% of adults, ages 18 to 83, support comprehensive sex education while only 36% support abstinence-only education (8). The authors’ backing for this warrant is credible knowing that it comes from a sophisticated
Sex in America’s high schools is a reality that must be faced head on. Many high school students today are struggling with the decision to have sex. As a society, are we letting today’s teens down by not having a full sexual education curriculum available in all high schools? In a study conducted in 2007, detailing the sexual activity of high school students, between grades ninth and twelfth showed that 48% of students had sexual intercourse (46% girls 50% boys) (ReCAPP). So why is it that our schools teach abstinence to the students? It is made clear by the study that half of the students are still having sexual contact with their partners. After personally experiencing sex at an early age, the discovery sex was foreign to me because of the lack of knowledge that was available in the 80’s. This is something that can be eliminated in this decade due to the knowledge of sex and the problems that can arise from a bad sexual experience.
Abstinence-only sex education teaches one main concept: to refrain from all sexual activity until marriage. This type of education avoids topics regarding contraceptive use and focuses on the benefits of remaining abstinent and the consequences of having sex before marriage. Some of the consequences of sexual activity before marriage include but are not limited to negative psychological and social impact, pregnancy, and contracting sexually transmitted infections (STIs). According to a 2010 study from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, about 70 percent of parents and over 60 percent of teenagers agree that sex should be reserved for marriage (Calabrese, 2012). Therefore it can be concluded that many parents and teens would agree with abstinence-only sex education as the preferred method of teaching adolescents about sex. This is one of the few reasons why the government has invested over $1.5 billion in abstinence-only sex education over the last decade (Kunz, 2013, p. 108). One of the highlighted phrases of abstinence-only sex education that educators like to use is “no sex is the safest sex” because not having sex means zero risk of pregnancy or contracting an STI. Proponents argue that while sex before marriage may be the cultural norm, it does not necessarily r...
Sexual education programs taught in high schools nationwide would be much more effective if instead of focusing exclusively on abstinence only programs, they taught a much more comprehensive program, which informed the adolescents how to be safe when it comes to dealing with sexual activities. Abstinence only programs are the widely favored programs of the past and of present time, but now more and more adults are starting to believe their children would be better educated if they were involved in a more comprehensive program, that not only emphasized the teachings of abstinence but taught their children how to be safe, and how to deal with the consequences of their sexual activities. Each program offers a wide array of information, but taking both of those programs and putting them together, will really help teenagers deal with their sexual drive and issues.
In the United States, there is a rising problem that is not going anywhere anytime soon, that is if we, as citizens, don 't change it. This problem is causing billions of dollars and people 's futures all because schools would rather teach ignorance than the truth. What’s the problem? Sex education. Although sex education may not seem like a rising conflict, it is actually one of the top controversial topics in our country regarding education. According to Brigid McKeon, “Each year, U.S. teens experience as many as 850,000 pregnancies, and youth under age 25 experience about 9.1 million sexually transmitted infections (STIs)” (McKeon). This number is so unbelievable to any sane person, but somehow schools still won 't take the initiative to teach realistic sex education. Sex education can be taught in two different procedures- comprehensive or abstinence only. The difference between the two methods is that comprehensive sex education teaches abstinence as a secondary choice, so that teens who decide not to wait are well educated on how to keep themselves protected. Comprehensive sex education should be required in every single public school because it is the most effective method on how to keep teenagers well informed and prepared.
The United States is notoriously known for having the highest rate of teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases among developed countries. To reduce these rates, the U.S government funded abstinence-only programs for the youth. Many have speculated whether abstinence programs are the best approach to lowering teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. Although there is enough data and research showing that comprehensive sex education is best, Kathrin F. Stanger-Hall and David W. Hall continued to provide data on how abstinence-only education affects the youth.
Sex among teenagers is one of the most controversial topics of our time. The teen pregnancy and STD rates in the United States alone have become a major problem over the years. Despite these skyrocketing sex cases, sexual education is not being taught in some schools, and the ones that do are extremely limited. Parents, the government, organizations, and school boards do not teach the proper curriculum necessary for students to thoroughly understand sexual behavior. This essay will explain the need for proper sexual education in our schools.
Today many teenagers are very sexually active. In fact, According to the Center of Disease Control, 47% of teenagers have reported being sexually active (http://www.cdc.gov 2013). These statistics illustrate the vital need for sexual education to be taught in all types of schools, and the importance of informing the teens on the risk of their behaviors, since this is where teenagers spend most of their time. In January 2014, over half of the states are required by the federal government to teach sexual education (http://www.ncsl.org 2014). Unfortunately, in many religious based schools, students are not instructed in sexual education. In fact they promote abstinence until marriage. According to “School-Based Health Clinics and Sex Education - A Christian View of Sex Education in Schools” The students are taught on a “government-funded abstinence-only-until-marriage education curricula”, and it’s said to “contain false and misleading "medical" statements and teach religious propaganda and theologically driven gender stereotypes to our children.” (http://www.probe.org 2012). Consequently the importance of such curriculum being present in religious based schools is shown through the teenager’s general knowledge of the risk of being sexually active, Sexually Transmitted diseases and Pregnancy prevention , and the studies on the effectiveness of sexual education in schools are topics that are often not taught in religion based schools thus leaving the students at risk.
Three million teenagers will contract a sexually transmitted disease and one in three women will become pregnant before they are twenty years old. Teens are contracting sexually transmitted diseases and getting pregnant at an alarming rate causing the government, schools, and parents to scratch their heads. America is the country with the highest teen pregnancy rate in the world. Many are wondering what can be done to stop this. A debate has been going on about whether abstinence only education is doing any good for high school students in America. Abstinence only education teaches teenagers to abstain from all sexual acts until they are married. It does not teach about pregnancy or the different types of contraceptives that are available to prevent pregnancy. On the other hand, there is safe sex education. Safe sex education teaches teenagers facts about intercourse they need to know, acknowledges the potential consequences or risks of sexual behavior, and helps them make better decisions to protect themselves and their bodies.
Before moving on, one must know that sex education is about, but not limited to the discussion of sexual intercourse. As a Buzzle article states, it involves a multitude of topics that introduce human sexual behaviors such as puberty, sexual health, sexual reproduction, sexuality, and more (Iyer). If formally received in school, these topics are brought up and discussed at age-appropriate times over the course of children’s junior high and high school education. Moreover, as I have introduced earlier, the way sex education should be taught is divided into two approaches. It is between taking either a conservative, abstinence-only approach or a more liberal, comprehensive approach. Abstinence-only education, approaches students by stressing the importance of “no sex before marriage” as be...
Sex education in our schools has been a hot topic of debate for decades. The main point in question has been whether to utilize comprehensive sex education or abstinence-only curriculum to educate our youth. The popularity of abstinence-only curriculum over the last couple of decades has grown largely due to the United States government passing a law to give funding to states that teach the abstinence-only approach to sex education. But not teaching our children about sex and sexuality is not giving them the information they need to make well educated decisions. Sex education in our schools should teach more than just abstinence-only because these programs are not proven to prevent teens from having sex. Children need to be educated on how to prevent contracting sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancies and be given the knowledge to understand the changes to their bodies during puberty. According to the Guidelines for Comprehensive Sexuality Education: Kindergarten-12th Grade from the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS), comprehensive sex education “should be appropriate to age, developmental level, and cultural background of students and respect the diversity of values and beliefs represented in the community” (SIECUS).