Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Prevention method of terrorism
Terrorism and its impact
Terrorism and its impact
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Prevention method of terrorism
“International terrorism" means activities with the following three characteristics: 1. involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law; 2. appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and 3. occur totally outside the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S., or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum.” (“Definitions of Terrorism in the U.S. Code.”). “The eradication of international terrorist factions is a goal the United Nations has been in pursuit of since its inception. From fear campaigns to suicidal bombings, terrorism is opposed by the entire civilized world, despite the few countries which harbor terrorist organizations within their borders” (“International Terrorism”). Indonesia is completely against terrorism in any form.
How the issue affects your country
In October 2002, a nightclub bombing in Bali killed 202 people. In August 2003, a car bomb exploded outside the Mariott Hotel in Jakarta. It killed 14 people. In September 2004, a car bomb exploded outside of the Austrailian Embassy in Indonesia. It killed 9 people and injured more than 180. In October 2005, there were three suicide bombings on the island of Bali. It killed 23 people. In 2009, two suicide bombing attacks on the JW Mariott and the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in Jakarta kills nine people and injured many others. From February to March 2010, several suspected Is...
... middle of paper ...
...tion.html>.
“International Terrorism”. DIMUN Handbook. January 2014. Print. 12 February 2014
Japan-Indonesia Joint Announcement on Fighting against International Terrorism. Pdf. 16 Feb. 2014.
Natalegawa, R. M. Marty M. “Session I - Opening Session: Strengthening the Implementation of the United Nations Global Counter Terrorism Strategy”. International Counter- Terrorism Focal Points Conference on Addressing Conditions Conductive to the Spread of Terrorism and Promoting Regional Cooperation. Geneva, Switzerland. 13 June 2013. Published Conference Presentation. 18 February 2014.
Report on Terrorist Incidents - 2006. National Counterterroism Center. 30 April 2007. Print. 18 February 2014.
2011 Report on Terrorism. National Counterterrorism Center. 12 March 2012. Print. 18 February 2014.
ABSTRACT: Terrorists were very active long before September 11. This essay reviews the 1988 downing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland and the March 1995 gas attack in the Tokyo subway. The results of these terrorist acts, who carried them out, how they were carried out, and what can be done in the future to prevent such incidents from happening again are all investigated.
Terrorism – This is a word that many people are terrified of. When a terrorist attack occurs, people’s daily routines are shattered. Things change instantaneously the moment the bomb goes of. When we think about a terrorist attack that really impacted the world, we immediately think about 9/11. On that day many people were hurt directly and indirectly. People were disorientated and scared. The moment there is change, the world panics. Unfortunately, 9/11 was not the only day where people panicked. On 1988, the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 occurred. This terrorist attack was not as massive as 9/11; but, it did leave scares especially to the Syracuse University community.
In Brym’s article he discusses what research has shown about the motivations of suicide bombers. Brym and my fellow classmate explained to me how suicide bombers may be motivated by politics, religion, or retaliatory aims (Brym, Kyra Howard). Both Brym and Howard helped me view the issue of suicide bombers in multiple
Categorical terrorism, according to Jeff Goodwin, is defined as “the strategic use of violence and threats of violence, usually intended to influence several audiences, by oppositional political groups against civilian or noncombatants who belong to a specific entity, religious or national group, social class or some other collectivity, without regard to their individual identities or roles.” More so, in terms of definition, according to a study done by Jeffrey Record in 2003, there was a count of over 109 definitions of terrorism, covering 22 different categorical elements. During the 70s and 80s, the United Nations struggled to define the term, finally coming up with the following definition: “Criminal acts intended or calculated to provoke a state of terror in the general public, a group of persons or particular persons for political purposes are in any circumstance unjustifiable, whatever the considerations of a political, philosophical, ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or any other nature that may be invoked to justify them.”
In Robert Pape’s Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism he investigates the three hundred and fifteen suicide terrorist attacks that have occurred from its beginning in 1980 up until 2003. By examining these attacks he explains the three logics behind suicide terrorism, the strategic, the social, and the individual logic. Pape uses Dying to Win as a tool to educate the public on suicide terrorism. He hopes people will begin to understand that it is not irrational, but requires reason and strategy. He brings to light that suicide terrorism is not directly correlated with Islamic fundamentalism, but rather political objectives, trying to put to rest many preconceived notions. By understanding the logic behind suicide terrorism people can work together to prevent it from happening in the future. After reading this book it is clear that suicide terrorism is not random, but does demand some thought in order for it to work.
a series of deliberate and deadly terrorist acts. The victims were in airplanes or in their offices – secretaries, businessman and women, military and federal workers. Moms and dads, friends and neighbors. Thousands of lives were suddenly ended by, despicable acts of terror. The pictures of airplanes flying into buildings fires burning, huge structures collapsing have filled us with disbelief, terrible sadness and a quiet unyielding anger.
As stated by Haddow, C., Bullock, J., Coppola, D.P., Terrorism is a global problem. From 1969 to 2009, over 38,000 terrorist attacks were reported worldwide. Three thousand, or 8 percent of these, targeted Americans or American interests both inside the United States and overseas, leading to the deaths of almost 5600 people and injuries to over 16,000 more (p. 309).
There a small but clear differences between domestic terrorism and international terrorism, that difference is where the terrorist act is planned, supported, and carried out. In the case of domestic terrorism, the act must be planned, supported, and carried out all within the boundaries of the United States. The domestic terrorists must also be domicile to the United States and not be current foreign nationals at the time of the act. If the terrorist act is committed with help from a foreign group, planned or supported in a foreign country or committed by foreign nationals inside the boundaries of the U.S., then the attack may be international terrorism. The 9/11 attack was a clear act of international terrorism as it was planned, supported,
Deducing from all the readings it appears that the major cause of suicide terrorism is being occupied by a foreign power and the loss of identity. Though there are several causes to what may inspire someone to commit such acts the focus will be on this one. Pape states that suicide terrorism is a response the requires strategy and more often than not is employed by groups whose sole goal is t...
Rowan Day (2015) draws attention to the concern of Islam on the Australian-Indonesian link. Day makes it clear that the attack on the United States by Al-Qaeda (2001) and the bomb attack in Bali (2002), create a shift in the attitudes of individuals towards terrorism. He claims that Indonesia is ‘a physical threat to the nation’s security’, (p.672) this manifests the idea that Australia was fearful, and at the same time was drawn out in different directions. As a result of these events, the World Trade Centre was torn down and thousands of individuals lost their lives. This meant that the Indonesian leaders were seen as victims of criticism, and for this reason there were anti-Indonesian sites within Australia. On the other hand, there were beliefs that Australian scholars were anti-Indonesian, and these circumstances were enforced on Australian students. This indicates that the idea of ‘such a group exists, even if it is a misleading or simplistic label, can influence Indonesia’s approach to the relationship’ (p.679). Similarly, Indonesia stimulant laws is the source of concern in the Australia-Indonesia relations. According to Jeff Lewis and Belinda Lewis (2010), President Suharto introduced the laws, as a ‘significant gesture toward Sha’riah and the widening ambit and political strength of religious politicism in Indonesia’ (p.145). This indicates that the Indonesian leaders were known for
Pape believes that suicide terrorism is focused around democracies and occupation. After conducting his research, Pape discovered that from 1980 to 2001, records of suicide terrorism have had three main reoccurring, necessary properties: timing, nationalist goals, and target selection. Pape (2003) explains that, when it comes to timing, “nearly all suicide attacks occur in organized, coherent campaigns, not as isolated or randomly timed incidents” (347). Thus, Pape infers there is strategic reasoning behind this way of terrorizing the masses. He further states campaigns of suicide terrorism focus on gaining oversight of territory terrorists deem as their national homeland.
The threat of global terrorism continues to rise with the total number of deaths reaching 32,685 in 2015, which is an 80 percent increase from 2014 (Global Index). With this said, terrorism remains a growing, and violent phenomenon that has dominated global debates. However, ‘terrorism’ remains a highly contested term; there is no global agreement on exactly what constitutes a terror act. An even more contested concept is whether to broaden the scope of terrorism to include non-state and state actors.
The U.S. Department of State defines terrorism as, “The calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological”. Whereas the Belgium Red Cross says that terrorism is committed “for the purpose of intimidating the population, forcing a third party to act or destablishing or destroying the fundamental structures of a country or of an international organization”.
The compelling need for the international community to come up with a comprehensive definition of terrorism is so that all nations have the same understanding of what is and what is not terrorism. By having an internationally agreed upon definition by all nations, it will make it easier for the country that experiences acts of terrorism to prosecute the perpetrators of the terrorist acts. In doing this ‘people’ who are trying to achieves international notoriety by committing ‘illegal’ acts which they see as terrorist acts to gain recognition in the international community, would be less likely to commit these illegal acts. It would also not gain them the worldwide recognition they seek.
Terrorism is one of the most extensively discussed issues of our time and at the same time it is also one of the least understood. The term itself “terrorism” means many different things to different people, cultures, and races. As a result, trying to define or classify terrorism with one universal definition is nearly impossible. The definition of terrorism used in this research is a reflection of much of the Western and American way of defining it. The definition of terrorism is,