Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
social media can negatively affect self image
social media's effect on self image
how social media effects self image
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: social media can negatively affect self image
Introduction In an age where instant access to information has influenced the privacy workplace model, which once prevails over what were inalienable assumptions of privacy is no longer a certainty in the workplace. Some companies require employees to sign confidentiality agreement to protect their patents, formulas, and processes. There are instances where companies dictate a “no compete” clause in their hiring practices, to prevent an employee from working for competitors for typically two years without legal implications. While these examples represent extents, employers go to protect their company’s privacy; companies do not go to that extent to protect the privacy of their employees. Companies have determined what an employee does while at work or away from work on social media can greatly affect the company’s image. For example, the National Football League (NFL) has a code of conduct policy that holds employees of a team and organization accountable for the employee’s comments on social media. An employee, on their own time, is no longer a private entity, acting on their own accord without consequences from their employer. This new approach to managing a company’s image or message dictates how a company monitors and responds to acts, whether they are behavior, speech or actions they find inappropriate. Social Media Social media is a new phenomenon for most companies; it has also greatly affected the workplace. The influxes of technology combine with the availability of mobile devices have changed private moments and thoughts shared in the workplace. “Employees' workplace privacy is being invaded by increased use of social media, according to a survey published today by security software firm AVG technologies” Newcombe, T... ... middle of paper ... ...ddress this growing trend. References Gregory, D. (2005, 06). Privacy in the workplace. Issues, 71, 31-32. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.library.capella.edu/docview/220283693?accountid=27965 Lissy, W. E. (1993). Workplace privacy. SuperVision, 54(10), 20. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.library.capella.edu/docview/195582972?accountid=27965 Martucci, W. C., & Shankland, R. J. (2012). New laws prohibiting employers from requiring employees to provide access to social-networking sites. Employment Relations Today (Wiley), 39(2), 79-85. doi:10.1002/ert.21368 Newcombe, T. (2013, February 1). Social media has eroded workplace privacy. Retrieved from http://www.hrmagazine.co.uk/hro/news/1076130/social-media-eroded-workplace-privacy Walsh, D. (2012). Employment law for human resource practice. (4 ed.). Macon: South-Western Legal Studies in Business.
Ever since Mark Zuckerberg created Facebook in 2004, millions of people have flocked to the website, resulting in “1.49 billion active users” (Facebook). Facebook allows users to not only reconnect with old friends, but also share whatever the user deems necessary. Facebook has many privacy settings that enable users to prevent anyone from seeing what they post. Even so, skeptics out in the world strongly attest that Facebook, and similar social media websites, aren’t all they’re cracked up to be. In the essay Why Asking for a Job Applicant’s Facebook Password Is Fair Game, Alfred Edmond Jr. addresses the false security Facebook provides to its users, and uses that notion to support his claim that bosses should
Have you ever been confronted by an employer or administrator because they just so happened to come across a post you made on a personal account of yours? A friend of mine almost lost her job because of a situation like this. One day, while she was at work, she posted a tweet saying that she was tired of her job. A couple of days later, she was approached by one of her managers. Her manager acknowledged the tweet and also mentioned that his boss saw it as well. She explained to her manager that it was not her intention to be “insulting”. Her manager strictly explained to her that if he were to be notified about a similar post, she would be fired. I believe that her tweet was a personal thought and that she was only expressing how she felt at the moment. In result of this, employers should not hire or fire employees based on the content of their social media.
Social networking sites promote the sharing of personal information in the public format. Social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter promote the oversharing of details of personal lives. Posts on these platforms may vary in regards to what one may be watching, or having for breakfast, or it may include pictures of one’s latest vacation or nights out with friends at a local bar. (10) Since personal information can be shared very frequently and with ease, consumers are more likely to disregard the restraint they normally would use when sharing information in regards to personal matter. (10, 11)
Gevertz and Greenwood enforce the reality that it is important for employees to be on board with social media policies for their company or else they run the risk of being fired.
Facebook and Twitter work-related conversations are under the provisions of the National Labor Relations Act. Employers are prohibited by the Act from restricting employee use of social media by excessive polices. Employees cannot be terminated disciplined for conducted on social media. The National Labor Relations Board received several charges in the year of 2010 regarding federal law violations which occurred as a result of Facebook postings. Complaints were issued to employers prior to an investigation which was conducted by NLRB. However there was no protection which covered the communications therefore no violation was committed. Several Board decision became more prevalent during the year of 2012. Which established precedence in regards to the
Brice,Fifer,S & Naron,G(2012)Social Media in the Workplace.The NLRB Speaks:Intellectual Property & Technology law Journal ,24(10),13-17)
Whitlock, D. C. (2012, September). How to manage and regulate social media in the workplace. Building and Construction, 38. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy.davenport.edu/docview/1173891821/80A48A677FDC4E84PQ/2?accountid=40195
While monitoring has been around for many years, employees think monitoring poses a bigger threat to his or, her privacy in the workplace. Even though it is unde...
Having a social media account in today 's society is part of the norm and while many people are getting jobs at a younger age, having a social media account while working is very common. There are many types of social media accounts ranging from posting just pictures, sharing recipes, and telling everyone what you 're currently doing. As employees post on their behalf, many employers are getting upset about the post contain. The employer could put the employee liable of the post on probation or the employee could get terminated. Many employees argue that their social life "outside" of the job should not reflect on them on who they are on the job. Other employees may state that just because they work in a professional job setting, should not
Chapter five in Privacy Lost starts the third part of the book. It focuses on the protection of privacy through the lens of legal structure. In this chapter Holtzman argues that laws can’t keep up with technology advances. Before starting to discuss the connection between privacy and law, Holtzman perfectly states that the word “privacy” hasn’t been used in the U.S. Constitution. “Absent adequate legal protection” presents problems in court when citizens claim the right to be protected (94).
A person’s right to privacy is being challenged with the high use of social media such as Facebook and Twitter. What used to be considered part of your personal life is not so personal anymore. When one chooses to share details about ones-self to their friends via a social media, they are not always thinking about the “other” people. The other people could be ones current boss or future employer. Other people could be a school official, your baseball coach, your friends’ mother; you name it the list goes on and on. Recently, a few employers or perspective employers have requested Facebook and other social network log-in information. It is probably a violation of equal employment laws, and there are two senators investigating the practice of requiring job applicants and employees to provide their social network log-in information as a condition of employment.
Stead, Bette Ann. Privacy and Rights In The Work Place. Houston: University of Houston, College of Business Administration, 1998.
As technology penetrates society through Internet sites, smartphones, social networks, and other modes of technology, questions are raised as the whether lines are being crossed. People spend a vast majority of their time spreading information about themselves and others through these various types of technology. The problem with all these variations is that there is no effective way of knowing what information is being collected and how it is used. The users of this revolutionary technology cannot control the fate of this information, but can only control their choice of releasing information into the cyber world. There is no denying that as technology becomes more and more integrated into one’s life, so does the sacrificing of that person’s privacy into the cyber world. The question being raised is today’s technology depleting the level of privacy that each member of society have? In today’s society technology has reduced our privacy due to the amount of personal information released on social networks, smartphones, and street view mapping by Google. All three of these aspects include societies tendency to provide other technology users with information about daily occurrences. The information that will be provided in this paper deals with assessing how technology impacts our privacy.
But, these laws always changing, depending on the work setting or policies set by any specific organizations. Because there are so many different work environments, each claim of privacy has to be evaluated based on the actual conditions of the workplace (Smith & Burg, 2015). This is why policies must be set according to the CEO needs. If the organization does not allow the use of the internet for any personal use, than the employee must follow such guidelines. This eliminates employee privacy right violations, because the policy will informs them of the monitoring during the hiring
Policies affect employee privacy by lowering employees' expectations of privacy in the workplace because he or she cannot expected privacy if an employee conducts the activity in a manner open to other employees. If an employee's reasonable expectations are similar to the privacy of personal mail delivered from the post office, he or she may believe the computer are just as private as the documents that he or she stored in the personal workplace's desk or filing cabinet. This reasoning of employee's reasonable expectations violates the employee's privacy. Yet, the employer stands may be that it has a justifiable interest in the oversight of business related employees communications, and in the cost of the used of the computer system. Only through consideration will these two interests will allow the right determination to be determine.