Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
social divisions in society
social divisions in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: social divisions in society
Richard Alba and Victor Nee assert in Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration that the way in which we understand assimilation is changing. In their writing, they reshape the dated view of assimilation constitutive of “marked deficiencies”. (6) One of the ways in which Alba and Nee discuss assimilation is through discourse about ethnic boundaries. The question: what are ethnic boundaries and how do they fit into the discussion of assimilation?, is something that is considered in the book. However, Alba and Nee are not the only writers to have an opinion on the subject of ethnic boundaries; Fredrik Barth in his piece Ethnic Groups and Boundaries expounds on the ideas of ethnic boundaries and what they mean to society. Therefore, it is useful to compare and contrast the two differing opinions in order to understand the full scope of information on ethnic boundaries.
In Remaking the American Mainstream, Alba and Nee claim that ethnicity is a “social boundary, a distinction that individuals make in their everyday lives…that shapes their actions and mental orientations toward others.”(11) The authors also assert that this distinction is something that is based on “cultural differences between groups that give an ethnic boundary significance.”(11) That is to say, the ethnic boundary acts on the idea of an out-group and an in-group. In order to be within the boundary, you must possess certain specific, unique and authentic qualities that separate you from the out-group. Barth maintains the same sentiment, as he states, “The boundaries to which we must give our attention are of course social boundaries…If a group maintains its identity when members interact with others, this entails criteria for determi...
... middle of paper ...
...pating in “mainstream institutions”, with a connotation of desire and willingness to participate, whereas Barth takes more negative approach implying that the reason for this assimilation is not willing, rather essential.
By analyzing the information and the way it is presented, I tend to be more convinced by Barth’s interpretation of ethnic boundaries and the way they fit in with assimilation. In my opinion, Barth takes on a very realistic and objective approach to ethnic boundaries and assimilation that depicts both neither negatively nor positively. On the other hand, Alba and Nee tend to have a more biased approach rooted in optimism in order to reshape the way in which the readers think about assimilation. I’m not sure if I am completely persuaded by Alba and Nee’s definitions of assimilation and how they function with regards to ethnic groups and minorities.
Both authors rely on case studies of specific ethnic groups as a platform to push their respective arguments. For the purpose of this essay, only the Jewish and Black ethnic groups will be discussed since conjunctively they reflect the dichotomy of assimilation “success” and “failure”. One of the strengths of Sowell’s work though is how extensive and detailed he goes into ethnic groups. Not only does Sowell cover a large variety of ethnic groups, he also discusses differences within ethnic groups. Steinberg instead groups ethnic groups more
...rself in between the two, and in doing so partially “unmakes” the ethnic identity passed on to her from her ancestors. The question of whether she is more assimilated into American culture or is more dissimilated from the culture of her ancestors is arbitrary and ambiguous. She is simultaneously both and neither; she is a new person who enjoys the American way of life but will always feel burdened by the “weight” of her ancestors “upon [her]” (297).
...namic Model of Cultural Assimilation (2002): n. pag. Bc.edu. Boston College, Nov. 2002. Web. 20 Nov. 2013. .
...d not assimilate to accepted American culture. However, by the time society learned which ethnicities were ‘unassimilable’, the cultures had already begun to take root in America. At first America had a knee-jerk reaction to this realization and began passing more resolutions preventing ‘non-whites’ from entering the United States. However, as America experienced the increase in cultural communities in reaction to prejudice formed by immigration laws, the government learned that only through a loosening of immigration law and lessening of prejudice would America become a true melting pot. The mid-1900s saw this manifestation in America, as immigration laws allowed more people from around the world to immigrate. As prejudice lessened, the cultural communities sprinkled throughout America that created a mosaic became less prevalent and have begun to form a melting pot.
Notwithstanding Brubaker (2001) argues that there are two basic meanings of assimilation, namely: the general and abstract sense and the specific and organic sense and both differ in their affective overtones, moral and political connotation, and intellectually respectability. The general and abstract sense, deals with the process of increasing similarity or becoming similar or likeness but not identical. It focusses on the process and not the final state — designates a direction of change, not a particular degree of similarity. While specific and organic sense, focuses on the final state and assimilation is a matter of either /or, not of degree. Assimilation in this sense implies complete absorption into the system or community (Brubaker, 2001).
There has been many discussions about how people try to fit in society, whether it is for music, interests in subjects, or even trying to fit in a specific culture. Groups and individuals seems to have a distinction among each other when it comes down to fitting in society and how they differ and have tensions among each other to conform to social norms. In “Making Conversation” and “The Primacy of Practice” by Kwame Anthony Appiah discusses how all cultures have similarities and differences but sometimes those differences are so different that they can not connect to another nation. Manuel Munoz in “Leave Your Name at the Border” argues how immigrants in a city are forced to act more societal and how it typically affects the diversity in
Immigrants are defined as people who permanently move to a forgiven country from their origin country. Immigrants can move for the purposes of seeking better living, better education, or in order to avoid any sort of issues in their origin country. Despite the reasoning behind the decision of the movement, an immigrant will be affected by the change of culture, way of life, social system and community. The process of the movement effects each individual differently depending on their, age, gender and their level of connection to their past culture. Having that said, the younger the age of the individual, the more venerable and easily they become to changing their way of life in order to feel a part of a community. Gender however is also related to the race of the person. To elaborate, females and black males are more open to the idea of changing any of their factors to adjust to their ‘new society’. An individual’s connection with their past culture, has a great impact on their personality and their standing and belief in their values, morals and culture. Therefore, the stronger and deeper the connection with their original culture and way of life, the more satisfied the individual becomes. Therefore, they don’t feel the urge to compete with another culture. Therefore, their current standing with their own culture has a strong impact on their future judgment on other culture. The weaker the connection the more prone they are to changing their current culture. Thus, an individual’s stability level towards their culture depends on other factors that are concerned with them. [Different age groups are faced with different situation that leads them to deal with different issues and therefore they are exposed to different kinds of expe...
Curtin’s “Coculturation: Toward a Critical Theoretical Framework for Cultural Adjustment” explores the many aspects of cultural adaptation. To enhance the conversation and construct a dialogue that counters that of the status quo, Melissa L. Curtin proposes a theory of Coculturation. Curtin (2010) seeks to “underscore the complex and ongoing processes of identification for all members of a community; to challenge any notion of a static, monolithic target culture; and to foreground that macrolevel sociopolitical and sociohistorical contexts, as well as microlevel social interactional processes, are important in understanding cultural adjustment” (p. 271). This work illuminates the conversation of acculturation and assimilation by combating the hegemonic discourse of traditional theoretical frameworks. According to Curtin, the rhetoric surrounding acculturation in the U.S. commonly “presumes an imagined national host community of a white, monolingual, English-speaking America to which immigrants should quickly assimilate.”
Immigration and assimilation is a divisive topic that has been heavily debated in America ever since we became a country. There are two stories that explore the assimilation issue from different viewpoints’; in Mary Pipher’s story; “The Beautiful Laughing Sisters – An Arrival Story”; provides the viewpoint of immigrants leaving a hostile home for America. Elizabeth Wong details her journey to break with her culture and become Americanized in, “The Struggle to be an all American girl.” and (McWhorter, 2010 pp522-529). At debate today is whether immigrants and their families should blend into American culture even if it means breaking with their past. Once cultures intermingle, they are forever changed.
...inferior cultures are always able to adapt and learn things from larger groups, in contact zone environments the larger groups are finally able to draw things from the smaller cultures as well, and thus transculturation becomes a two-way street. Only when people are made aware of the marginal diversity that surrounds them in everyday life are they able to gain a wider understanding and deeper knowledge of the world around them. They are then able to apply that knowledge to shape and benefit the way they interact with others and operate as a part of a society that is more open, leaving behind the mistake of imagined communities and applying inaccurate definitions to groups of people.
Race and Ethnicity is a widely discussed issue in our society and in the world we live in today. Often times there are two alternatives on race and ethnicity, whether they are fixed or fluid. This discussion over time has lead to the different paradigms attempting to explain race and ethnicity and how sociologist feel they apply to people (Cornell and Hartmann, pg. 44). A more popular fluid approach at race and ethnicity is the assimilationist perspective. This perspective was first introduced to debunk the biological/social darwinism perspective, instead of defining racial and ethnic differences due to biological terms researchers now introduced these relations according to cultural differences. The assimilationist perspective allows us to
The interaction between the immigrant and the citizens of the receiving country varies on whether or not their introduction into the new country is seen as a loss or something positive. These differing stances serve as a buffer for an immigrant’s desires, as they can either advance or stagger depending on how far their new situation allows them to advance. For this reason, the likely success of the individual depends on the descending community’s desire to embrace them. This acceptance or denial presents itself in the form of the resources available to “the other.” If these outsiders are not given the tools with which to function properly they will likely find solace in the ethnic specific networks that provide them with a means to survive.
One of the most important concepts that I have learned from class is Assimilation Theory. This theory is based on the adaptation that a certain ethnic group goes through in order to fit in and survive in the new dominant society. For example, according to the book the United States in known to be a predominantly white cultural society, therefore many ethnic groups from all over who choose to come to the U.S often have to assimilate and adapt to the social and cultural norms. Assimilation theory affects many ethnic groups in sense that it can change the way they behave and live in a society. Whenever another ethnic group immigrates to a place where there is a dominant ethnic group they often have to assimilate to the dominant group’s social, economic, and cultural behaviors and customs to survive. For example in the U.S, there are many minority groups from all over the globe who immigrated to this country and they often have to go through various changes and adaptations to fit into society and gain citizenship in the country. These changes can be a challenge for them because they have to choose between their own cultural values, beliefs, and behaviors and assimilate to the U.S’ cultural values and customs. In the book it states that “their cultural ancestry is English, Scottish, Dutch and German which is the Anglo-Saxon core.” Therefore, the culture that immigrants in the U.S. have to adapt to is the Anglo-Saxon culture/ “American culture.” For most minorities immigrating to the U.S, one of the major factors that affected them is language barrier. In the United States English is the dominant language, many ...
Teske, Raymond H.C., Jr., and Bardin H. Nelson. Acculturation and Assimilation: A Clarification 1.2 (1974): 351-67. Jstor.org. Jstor.org/journals, Feb. 2013. Web. 15 Nov. 2013.
thus “racial difference is the greatest obstacle to the process of assimilation” (68). In Traise