Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
greek philosophy influence on western civilization
greek philosophy influence on western civilization
greek philosophy influence on western civilization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: greek philosophy influence on western civilization
Throughout the semester our class has explored a chronological look at just some of the philosophers whose works have been published over time. Throughout the readings reoccurring themes, such as religion, wisdom, knowledge, reality and life occur and each philosopher offering their own opinions. Given these works, a timeline of viewpoints can be developed and can give a decent view of the shape of philosophy over time, as well as offering insight to how the time period and location may have shaped the views of philosophers.
One of the most surprising themes many of the philosophers had in common was religion. Each viewed it in their own unique way. Starting with Aristotle who was born in 384 B.C. and developed his views in Greece during a time where polytheism was standard and Christianity did not exist. Aristotle believed in eternity and an afterlife much like most Greeks as well as Plato, his teacher.
Descartes, a 17th century philosopher originally from France, had views of the world and life that quite possibly were influenced by his experience as soldier and a thirst for proof of everything he had ever been told. He distrusted God blaming him for all of the falsehoods he had experienced in his lifetime; however, Descartes also later contradicts himself by coming to the conclusion that God is incapable of deception, but is capable of making mistakes, since he made man defective which is what causes the deceit.
Then Kierkegaard, a 19th century philosopher born in Denmark, must be considered. During his life he was likely influenced by a lifetime of suffering from the deaths of his wives and all of his sons, for which he blames God punishing him for his sins. He chooses to tackle Christianity specifically and a subseq...
... middle of paper ...
...believe everything without searching for the knowledge of the truth. In a way I feel Abbott’s Flatland is almost a good overview of many of the themes and proving the timelessness of the subject.
Overall this semester has yielded a chance to change perspectives on life, reality, knowledge, wisdom, and religion. From Plato to Descartes, Heidegger to Abbott, the readings give an eye-opening view of differences between regions, places and times that all can be tied together through common themes. Despite their differing views, the goals of the philosophers and their ideas that often surpassed their lifetimes still cause people to reflect on their versions of reality, thus raising numerous questions. The ease with which philosophical readings can relate even now to numerous parts of society, tells a true tale of a subject that will timelessly outlast many others.
In the field of philosophy there can be numerous answers to a general question, depending on a particular philosopher's views on the subject. Often times an answer is left undetermined. In the broad sense of the word and also stated in the dictionary philosophy can be described as the pursuit of human knowledge and human values. There are many different people with many different theories of knowledge. Two of these people, also philosophers, in which this paper will go into depth about are Descartes and Plato. Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy and Plato's The Republic are the topics that are going to be discussed in this paper.
In his quest for absolute, firm knowledge, Descartes eventually reaches a standstill that could prevent him from moving forward on his journey. This obstacle manifests itself in the form of an evil deceiver, a malicious entity with the ability to distort Descartes’ perceptions and trick him into believing a false claim to be truthful. The evil deceiver would endlessly mislead Descartes into thinking that an aspect of life were true. Given the power of this evil deceiver, Descartes would never know if the truths that he is reaching are in fact truthful. This conundrum in which Descartes finds himself encourages him to find some mechanism to counter the idea of an evil deceiver. Descartes realizes that the existence of God will eradicate the fear
Descartes believes “it is clear enough from this that he cannot be a deceiver, since it is manifest by the natural light that all fraud and deception depend on some defect” (89). In addition, to the third Meditation, Descartes further explains God’s existence as a non – deceiving entity of natural light in Meditation IV. Descartes stands with his position that God is perfection by saying “it is impossible that God should deceive me”. For in every case of trickery or deception some imperfection is found.
Stumpf, S. E., & Fieser, J. (2008). Philosophy: History and problems. . New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nadler, Steven M. The Best of All Possible Worlds: a Story of Philosophers, God, and Evil. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2008. Print.
Even though Averroes’ assertion that philosophy is an obligation from all who study religion seems to support innovative ideas, closer analysis shows the opposite. Considering all the limits set upon the encouragement of producing personal opinions, the role of philosophy is practically redundant. Opinions are only accepted from scholars, and even then, when they are in line with what is considered to be “right”.
Throughout human existence, scholars have earnestly pursued knowledge and the attainment of truth. Historical figures such as Plato, Descartes, and Emerson sought answers to daunting questions of: ‘What is truth?’; ‘What is reality?’; ‘How is wisdom acquired?’ Many scholars believe these philosophers presented conflicting viewpoints: Plato encouraging skepticism among all previous historical, cultural, and personal perspectives; Descartes questioning definitions of reality and his very existence; Emerson encouraging self-trust and confidence in one’s ideals, opinions, and convictions. Surprisingly, reconciliation can be reached from these three differing hypotheses. Emerson’s thesis merely expounds from Descartes and Plato’s philosophies. He builds from Descartes’ search for self-identity and reconciles Plato’s skepticism with his views of self-trust and unconformity among scholars.
As time progressed through the various ages, Ancient to Renaissance, a trend began to form in the literature. The Ancient periods, reflected in the writings of the Taoists and the Greeks, were basically a time of transcendentalism. The gods of this era were treated almost as if they are friends to the people, or advisors; the gods controlled their fates and the uncontrollable, but the people were still very individualistic. As time progressed forwards, a trend swept Europe towards a period of theism, where the god or gods are treated as father figures; the gods controlled the lives of all their people just as parents control their children, even, as Martin Luther stated, with an attitude of fear. Through the periods of Ancient Greece, to Medieval Europe, to Renaissance Europe, a cycle forms from a completely transcendentalist attitude to a completely theistic attitude, and back.
It is clear that although Plato and Aristotle believe different things about what happens after death and what the highest divinities are they do agree on some topics. They both think that the philosophy is the best way a human can spend their lives in a pursuit of happiness and truth. They both think that there are divinities which move the heavens. They both also believe that this world was created and was not just “always here.” Plato and Aristotle were neither Christians, Jews, nor Muslims but their ideas of divinity come so close to these monotheistic religions that it is difficult to believe their ideas have not had any influence in these religions as they developed many years after their works were conceived. In any case it is interesting to see what the thinkers believed before the onset of modern religious traditions.
René Descartes was a French philosopher who refused to believe that true knowledge was obtainable through the means of sense perception. Descartes believed that the senses; as we know them, could be manipulated and twisted into providing false understanding of the external world. In the search for the truth amongst what we perceive in life, Descartes is justified in his claims that our senses cannot be trusted. Only by questioning all that is known as human beings, can one find the absolute truth in life. Through the use of two different thought experiments, Descartes uses reasoning to questions what we perceive as reality and truth.
Moore, Brooke Noel., and Kenneth Bruder. "Chapter 6- The Rise of Metaphysics and Epistemology; Chapter 9- The Pragmatic and Analytic Traditions; Chapter 7- The Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries." Philosophy: the Power of Ideas. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2011. Print.
Coplestone, Frederick. A History of Philosophy- Greece and Rome. New York: Image Books,1962. (pgs 64-70).
Melchert, Norman. The Great Conversation: A Historical Introduction to Philosophy. 4th ed. Toronto: McGraw Hill Companies, 2002.
Rene Descartes, a 17th century French philosopher believed that the origin of knowledge comes from within the mind, a single indisputable fact to build on that can be gained through individual reflection. His Discourse on Method (1637) and Meditations (1641) contain his important philosophical theories. Intending to extend mathematical method to all areas of human knowledge, Descartes discarded the authoritarian systems of the scholastic philosophers and began with universal doubt. Only one thing cannot be doubted: doubt itself. Therefore, the doubter must exist. This is the kernel of his famous assertion Cogito, ergo sum (I am thinking, therefore I am existing). From this certainty Descartes expanded knowledge, step by step, to admit the existence of God (as the first cause) and the reality of the physical world, which he held to be mechanistic and entirely divorced from the mind; the only connection between the two is the intervention of God.
immortality, death, and the difference between the psyche (soul) and the soma (body) are just a few of the