When most people think about marriages they usually think about two people that have decided to take the next step in their relationship by promising each other to love and be faithful to one another until death separates them. That wasn’t how it always was and you’ll find the differences and similarities between marriages now and then quite surprising. Back then a marriage had nothing to do with the union of two people that were in love but with the outcome of this union and weather you’ll be able to benefit from this. In many cases now people have the choice to marry whomever they please and manage their marriage however they want to as well, which is a great change. If more people new how marriages were dealt with back then they will surely appreciate the great privilege they have on making their own decisions. Although here in the United States and in other countries people are allowed to make their own decisions on how to manage their marriage which in other countries they don’t allow this and they have kept their traditions.
During the early BC years the upper class would use marriages to bring the bride and groom’s family more wealth and power and a marriage would have nothing to do with love or religion. Even the lower class women had no say in their marriages and were also arranged. Most marriages were arranged by the bride and grooms family. Women were usually married off to someone in a nearby tribe, they were married very young to someone usually a bit older and if you weren’t married you would be considered an outcast. Many people would get married to create families so that their children would help the family and to have someone to take over their property when they’re not around any longer and if a woman wasn’t ab...
... middle of paper ...
...oyed learning about the history of marriages and I also learned a lot from this project after this I think that I will continue to find more information about this topic.
Works Cited
• Junkie, Soca. "Thread: The Origin of Marriage." IslandMix RSS. Islandmix.com, 31 Mar. 2004. Web. 08 Nov. 2013.
• Seabastian. "Arranged Marriages - Past and Present." HubPages. HubPages, n.d. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.
• "History of Marriage." CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA:. Kevin Knight, n.d. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.
• TheWeekStaff. "How Marriage Has Changed over Centuries - The Week." The Week. TheWeek, 1 June 2012. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.
• Edmonds, Molly. "Betrothed Through the Centuries: A Timeline of Marriage."HowStuffWorks. HowStuffWorks, Inc, n.d. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.
• Heine, Katherine. "A Little Perspective on Marriage." A Little Perspective on Marriage. Azcentral.com, 1 Nov. 2005. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.
Bill Cosby once said that, “For two people in a marriage to live together day after day is unquestionably the one miracle the Vatican has overlooked.” J.J. Lewis (1995-2009) This famous comedian could not have been more correct when recognizing that every marriage will face a multiple number of challenges and is often difficult. Couples, once married, must find a way to end any struggles in order for the marriage to be successful. Marital traditions have changed greatly over the centuries and due to this, the opinion of what an ‘ideal marriage” consists of has changed as well. When reviewing the document “On Love and Marriage” the author (a Merchant of Paris) believes that marriage should not be an equal partnership, but one that pleases the husband to avoid conflict. This can be clearly seen through an examination of: the social, and political environment of the late fourteenth century, and the merchant’s opinions on the area of obedience to a husband, and how to avoid infidelity.
Mahin, Michael J. The Awakening and The Yellow Wallpaper: "An Intertextual Comparison of the "Conventional" Connotations of Marriage and Propriety." Domestic Goddesses (1999). Web. 29 June 2015.
DeVault, C., Cohen, T., & Strong, B. (2011). The marriage and family experience: Intimate relationships in a changing society. (11th ed., pgs. 400-426). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth cengage learning.
A History of Marriage by Stephanie Coontz speaks of the recent idealization of marriage based solely on love. Coontz doesn’t defame love, but touches on the many profound aspects that have created and bonded marriages through time. While love is still a large aspect Coontz wants us to see that a marriage needs more solid and less fickle aspects than just love.
Marriage was something that was to benefit both families in the 1500-1600s. It was considered foolish to marry for love, and with permission from parents boys were allowed to be married at 14 and girls at 12. It was recommended that males didn’t marry before 22 and girls before 18. Single women were thought to be witches.
Morse, Jennifer R. "Marriage & Relationships." The Problem With Living Together. Focus On The Family, 2001. Web. 21 Feb. 2014.
A marriage in the 19th century had many different expectations than it does today. Most marriages, especially for the upper class, were conducted as an exchange of assets and used for public display. Hendrik Hartog in his lecture titled, "Marital Expectations in Nineteenth Century America," writes, "At least until the middle years of the nineteenth century being married meant subjecting oneself to a known and coercive public relationship," (96). It was an agreement that publicly cha...
Murstein, Bernard I.. Love, sex, and marriage through the ages. New York: Springer Pub. Co., 1974. Print.
Robson, Ruthann. "The Reader's Companion to U.S. Women's History: Marriage." Houghton Mifflin Study Center. 19 Nov. 2005. http://college.hmco.com/history/readerscomp/women/html/wh_022200_marriage.htm.
Not being married was not always accepted as what it is today. People of the older generation were forced into marriage, even if they didn’t love that person. It was more of the concept of “they will learn to love each other.” Whereas today, anyone has the option of when to get married, who to marry, or even to never get
Although modern weddings have similar customs to Ancient Roman weddings, they were still different. While there are many differences, there are still similarities. The elements of a marriage in ancient Roman culture consisted of an engagement, choosing the date, the preparation of the bride, and the location of the wedding. While the much broader subjects are similar, the way it is performed is changed.
In Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen shows examples of how most marriages were not always for love but more as a formal agreement arranged by the two families. Marriage was seen a holy matrimony for two people but living happil...
During the Mesopotamia period, the first ever recorded marriage contract and ceremony dates to 4000 years ago. Woman had no rights in their marriage, even the lower class had no say in marriage, and therefore wives could not divorce unless the husband asked for it. Husbands were allowed to divorce their wife if she didn’t fulfill her duties (give birth to children.) During the Mesopotamia period, marriage was not because the two people loved each other, but because of preserving power, fathers’ of ruling class would even marry off their daughters. By doing this, it allowed the families to form alliances, acquire land, and produce legitimate heirs. Future husband, and bride-to-be’s father agreed on a contract that was a price for the maiden’s hand. If the marriage did not go well, and they divorced the father-in-law was entitled to satisfaction. The contract they made, had said, that if a child was not born, the husband got...
Marriage is one of the oldest cultural institutions in the world. Its status has changed drastically over the years, and in the last few decades alone has gone from being a social expectation to simply an option for most people. In the 1920s, marriage was generally considered an expectation for all young women, lest they dry up like cacti before they bore children. Today, marriage is generally recognized as a commitment that may satisfy some, though many choose to forgo the process. The differences between the cultural perception of marriage in the “Roaring Twenties” compared to today have manifested themselves in many different ways.
Although what we were told by God, in many primitive civilizations marriage was primarily industrial. During early times husband and wife were not much together; they did not even eat together very often.(The Marriage Institution 1). Their marriages were always planned by their parents and in some cases brides were bought. Polygamy was also frequent in the early history of marriage. Although, as civilization progressed monogamy became the idealistic goal of human sex evolution.(The Marriage Institution 6). In addition, as civilization advanced, marriage became more seriously regarded and the wedding ceremony became recurrent. The marriage ceremony grew out of the fact that marriage was originally a community affair and also primitive man had no records, so the marriage had to be witnessed by many people.