The study of globalization is a lengthy and complicated one. Referring to globalization in terms of Archaic, Proto, and Modern is not helpful because doing so contributes to the myth of globalization forged purely by dramatic new linkages by the Europeans in the face of a diminishing role of older connections. I will define each stage of globalization with regard to the current model, the onrush of each stage of globalization in terms of older patterns in both India and China, and finally how the British empire took advantage of these preexistent linkages to bring about Modern globalization in both India and China;all in hopes of dispelling the Eurocentrism present in the current explanation of Globalization.
In order to examine each stage globalization in terms of the other, one must first understand each stage in terms of its definitive characteristics. Archaic globalization is characterized by the networks of trade that arouse from sovereigns and local rulers sending out missions to acquire wealth and exotic goods.1 Proto Globalization promotes a complex pattern of multilateral trade through the trading of commodities on a globalized scale.Proto globalization also involves the growth of finance, services, and improved efficiency in the transactions sector.2Modern Globalization is the rise of industrialization and the modern nation state often expressed through imperialism.
The historiography of globalization should not be studied like most other historical events, through the system of chronology. When we study the chronology of events, including globalization we seamlessly move from one event to the next with the assumption that the prior is not continuing to operate and mold the latter.Within this myth of lack of interde...
... middle of paper ...
...urnal (2012): 1-26.Accessed November 17th,2013. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/45724/1/MPRA_paper_45724.pdf “Opium Financed British Rule in India”,BBC News, Feburary 23, 2008.Accessed November 17,2013. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/south_asia/7460682.stm#blq-main Silk Road Map. Map.Travel China Guide.Accessed November 17th,2013. http://www.travelchinaguide.com/silk-road/route.htm. Singh,Abhay Jumar. Modern World System and Indian Proto-Industrialization:Bengal 1650-1800.New
Delhi:Northern Brooks Center,2006.
The Opium Trade In China.Map. The first Opium War :the Anglo Chinese War of 1839-1842. Accessed November 17, 2013,http://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/21f/21f.027/opium_wars_01/ow1_essay02.html
Van de Ven,Hans. “The Onrush of Modern Globalization in China.” In Globalization in World History,edited By A.G. Hopkins,167-196.NewYork:W W Norton & Company,2002.
Lisa Lowe’s introduction on the word “globalization” was interesting as it reminded me of the readings and lectures regarding colonization of the United States. Globalization is described conditions that increased economic, social, and political interdependence among people. The article allows for comparisons to be made with eighteenth century America. For example, the arrival of English colonists led to a change in the North American landscape. This could also be described as an invasion of native land as colonists felt the land belonged to them. Similarly, Globalization also mentions American invasion in the context of the conflicts against Afghanistan and Iraq. In addition, both seventeenth and twentieth century America appear to some effect
Nothing good ever comes out of violence.Two wrongs never make it right, but cause harm. Contemporary society has not responded enough legacies of historical globalization. This essay will cover the following arguments such as residential schools, slavery and the Sierra Leone civil war.
New York: Norton, 1999. Print. The. Fairbank, John King, and Edwin O. Reischauer. China: Tradition and Transformation.
The Opium Wars were a series of three wars between the Chinese and the British; primarily fought in regard to the illegal trade of opium in China during the 19th century. They manifested the conflicting natures of both nations and demonstrated China’s misconceptions of its own superiority. The Opium Wars resulted in the humiliating defeat of the Chinese to a country they considered to be “barbarians”.
Regarding “The Age of Globalization” by Alan Brinkley I thought that the reading selection provides good details on timeline of significant events that significantly affected the global economy. The reading selection from the American History textbook starts off with a summary of event of September 11, 2001, and the role they played in the changes within global economy. On the next page we are presented with a timeline of events that will be described later in the reading selection. The purpose of this section is to illustrate how each of those events contributed to the world we live in today, particularly their influence on the global economy.
Allingham,, Philip V. "England and China: The Opium Wars, 1839-60." The Victorian Web: An Overview. 24 June 2006. Web. 06 Apr. 2011.
Criteria: What acts have actually been made to respond to the legacies of historical globalization? How have these effects been made in trying to respond to historical globalization? What has changed since then? What has not changed?
The three Globalizations contrast in many ways. Globalization 1.0, lasting from 1492 to about 1800, was about countries and muscles. Its force driving the process of global flattening was the amount of "muscle" your country had. The key agent of change in Globalization 2.0, which lasted from 1800 to 2000, was the power of multinational companies, which went global for markets and labor. Globalization 3.0, beginning in 2000 flattened the playing field even more. The dynamic force was the power by which individuals could collaborate and compete globally. They could do so digitally with the convergence of the personal computer with fiber-optic cable. Globalization 3.0 differs from the previous two not only in how the world is flattening, but also in the types of people involved. In Globalization 1.0 and 2.0 it was mostly American and European businesses who...
Perdue, Peter C. "The First Opium War: The Anglo-Chinese War of 1839-1842: Hostilities." MIT: Visualizing Cultures. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2011. Web. 25 Jan. 2014.
When the term “Globalization” is discussed, most academics, scholars, professionals and intellectuals attempt to define and interpret it in a summarized fashion. My main concern with this approach is that one cannot and should not define a process that altered decades of history and continues to, in less than 30 words. Global Shift is a book with remarkable insight. Peter Dicken rather than attempting to define the commonly misused word, explains Globalization in a clear and logical fashion, which interconnects numerous views. Dicken takes full advantage of his position to write and identify the imperative changes of political, economic, social, and technological dimensions of globalization.
An outstanding mechanism frequently used to interpret ‘Globalization’ is the ‘World Economy’. Back to the colonial age, the coinstantaneous behaviors of worldwide capitals and energy resources flowed from colonies to western countries has been regarded as the rudiment of the economic geography (Jürgen and Niles, 2005). Nowadays, the global economy was dominated by transnational corporations and banking institutions mostly located in developed countries. However, it is apparently that countries with higher level of comprehensive national strength are eager for a bigger market to dump surplus domestic produce and allocate energy resources in a global scale, thus leads to a world economic integration. This module was supported by several historical globalists (Paul Hirst, Grahame Thompson and Deepak Nayyer) ‘their position is that globalization is nothing new but more fashionable and exaggerate, a tremendous amount of internationalization of money and trade in earlier periods is hardly less than today.’ (Frans J Schuurman 2001:64).
Globalization can briefly be defined as ‘something’ that affects and changes the traditional arrangements of the state system. It is a term that directly implies change and therefore is a continuos process over a long period of time as compared to quickly changing into a wanted or desir...
Globalization is defined as “the historical process involving a fundamental shift or transformation in the spatial scale of human social organization that links distant communities and expands the reach of power relations across regions and continents (Baylis, 2014).”
Throughout this paper I have stated that modern globalization is mostly conveyed through an international flow of labor, thoughts and opinions both politically and economically. The idea of ‘time-space compression’, the discontinuity and the limits of global mobility contributes to characterize globalization as an uneven and awkward process instead of the metaphorical well-oiled machine analogy. It should be noted that globalization is not a new phenomenon; recent new developments that have shortened time and compressed space must be put into the context of long history.
Globalization has taken place in the past when state and empires expanded their influence far outside their border. However, one of the distinctions of globalization today is the speed with which it is transforming local culture as they took part in a worldwide system of interconnectedness. Through globalization, many cultures in the world have changed dramatically.