Gun Control: Open Carry Policy Is Not The Answer

1666 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Social issues of gun control

Gun control is a controversial issue that currently has no easy solution to please everyone. In an article written by Adam Winkler, a professor from the UCLA School of Law, he states that open carry is the answer to having fewer guns on the streets. His argument fails because it contains false premises throughout the article and is also inductively weak. First, he commits the slippery slope fallacy by assuming a series of events will occur for doing one action. Second, he commits the bandwagon fallacy. The fact that other states have the open carry law in effect does not make his argument true nor does it make it a valid reason. Last, he neglects how there will always be people who do not follow laws. Gun control in the United States has been a difficult topic for many people to discuss, but Winkler’s point of view of the topic does not give a complete thought about why people should agree with him.
Winkler argues that open carry is the solution to fewer guns on the streets in the following way:
An increase in concealed weapons will make people reconsider going to public places.
Very few people want to carry openly displayed guns because the police will hassle them, stores will refuse to serve them, and some people will not talk to them.
Concealed carry could be banned entirely if the state allowed open carry.
Open carry has an open benefit to people who do not like guns.
41 states in the United States currently allow an open carry policy.
Allowing people to carry guns openly may be the answer to fewer guns on California streets.

Winkler’s argument fails because it is inductively weak as there are a couple premises that commit a fallacy. Premise 2 commits the slippery slope fallacy while premise 5 commits the bandwagon fallacy. ...

... middle of paper ...

...onsideration, we can see that Winkler’s argument is inductively weak and neglects information that should be considered.

Works Cited

Blocher, Joseph. "Firearm Localism." Yale Law Journal 123.1 (2013): 82-146. Academic Search Premier. Web. 30 Mar. 2014.
Moorhouse, John C., and Brent Wanner. "Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control?." CATO Journal 26.1 (2006): 103-124. Academic Search Premier. Web. 5 Apr. 2014.
Ouimet, Marc. "Crime In Canada And In The United States: A Comparative Analysis." Canadian Review Of Sociology & Anthropology 36.3 (1999): 389-408. Academic Search Premier. Web. 5 Apr. 2014.
Phillips, Charles D., et al. "When Concealed Handgun Licensees Break Bad: Criminal Convictions Of Concealed Handgun Licensees In Texas, 2001-2009." American Journal Of Public Health 103.1 (2013): 86-91. Academic Search Premier. Web. 4 Apr. 2014.

Show More
Related

  • Gun Legislation

    1005 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...lation. In all actuality, gun legislation is a serious issue and through this essay, a reader would simply believe that the gun legislation is fine and does not need to be stronger. Although he gives personal examples throughout the essay, other examples would enforce that there should be stronger gun legislation and that guns actually cause harm. Other examples would also make Verhulst's essay stronger and show that other people are just as weak as he is, and reader's would have a stronger belief that gun legislation is too weak. His examples alone promote guns and do not prevent them because the examples glorify his weakness to yield to the temptation. Although he believes that the causes of his weakness and other peoples' weakness is because of emotions that triumph over reason, a stronger and bolder person for stronger gun legislation would have self-control.

    Read More

  • Research Essay: Gun Control (Rough Draft)

    1995 Words  | 4 Pages

    The topic of gun control became an element for discussion among Americans in the early 1930s when mob and gang crime was at an all-time high. The term “Gun Control” refers to a set of laws set in p...

    Read More

  • Stronger Gun Control Will Save Lives an Article by Christine Watkins

    887 Words  | 2 Pages

    Gun Control in America is seen as ineffective, citizens believe gun control laws in place are not protecting lives, but taking them away. In order to solve this problem, many think more laws should be put in place. By doing so, they believe guns would no longer be in the hands of criminals and lives would not be ended before their time. In Christine Watkins’s article, “Stronger Gun Control Will Save Lives” She explains that if guns were objects that truly kept us safe, America would be the safest country in the world. She also states that a gun in any home is more likely to be mistreated, causing an accidental shooting. She also hints that more common sense laws would greatly benefit gun owners (Stronger Gun Control). One of her points is quite agreeable, more common sense gun laws would be entirely useful in the long run. By having more safety guidelines, such as; trigger locks, which make it so the gun cannot be used, keeping the ammunition and the gun separated, never pointing a gun at another person, unless your life is in life threatening danger, making sure the weapon is properly cleaned on a regular basis, and even teaching children how to properly handle weapons. By taking these common sense precautions to use, it would prevent innumerable accidental misfires in homes. On the other hand, laws put in place to simply make it more difficult to obtain a weapon is not the answer. By keeping guns out of the lawful citizen’s hands, only the lawbreakers will benefit. Author John R. Lott, Jr. wrote the book entitled More Guns Less Crimes, informs readers that by having a concealed weapon, as opposed to carrying a weapon openly, carries more potential to reduce crime rates across America. By concealing a weapon, no one knows who is ...

    Read More

  • Gun Control Laws Will NOT Reduce Crime

    2312 Words  | 5 Pages

    Moorhouse, John C., and Brent Wanner. "Does Gun Control Reduce Crime or Does Crime Increase Gun Control?" CATO Journal 26.1 (2006): 103-24. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 15 June 2015.

    Read More

  • Crime in Canada

    1672 Words  | 4 Pages

    Welsh, B., & Irving, M. (2005). Crime and punishment in Canada, 1981-1999. Crime and Justice, 33, 247-294. Retrieved from http://library.mtroyal.ca:2063/stable/3488337?&Search=yes&searchText=canada&searchText=crime&list=hide&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dcrime%2Bin%2Bcanada%26acc%3Don%26wc%3Don&prevSearch=&item=18&ttl=33894&returnArticleService=showFullText

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: The Canadian Justice System

    507 Words  | 2 Pages

    The following is an adjusted version of an argument I presented in Critical Thinking last semester. My opinion has not changed, just expanded.. :)

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Concealed Carry

    2162 Words  | 5 Pages

    If a person don’t carry a concealed weapon, how will they be able to protect themselves and their precious family from vicious criminals? Shall issue states are states that citizens may apply and be considered by the state for a gun permit which is also known as concealed carry. John R. Lott, is an economist and has received his Ph.D. in economics from UCLA. He claimed "shall-issue" concealed carry laws reduced murders by 8.5%, rapes by 5%, aggravated assaults by 7%, and robbery by 3%, according to a 2000 analysis of FBI crime data” (Lott, John R.) This refers to how concealed carry reduces crime and information was reported by the FBI compared to the other states that don’t allow concealed carry. This quote shows real evidence on how guns

    Read More

  • An Argument for Gun Control

    2438 Words  | 5 Pages

    Rauch, Jonathan. “The Right Kind of Gun Rights.” National Journal Vol. 40 Issue 11. Academic Search Complete. 15 Mar. 2013. Web. 6 June 2015.

    Read More

  • Concealed Guns And Concealed Weapons

    1066 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...andgun license holders were arrested for a total of 5,314 crimes from January 1, 1996, to August 31, 2001” (Center). This shows that because the person know has the ability to hide a pistol on their person, they are more prone to committing a crime.

    Read More

  • Essay On Concealed Carry Of Handguns

    1254 Words  | 3 Pages

    As of 2013, all 50 states allow concealed carry of handguns (Concealed Carry Reciprocity Maps), although a few states don’t require a permit and the standards for licensing vary greatly from state to state. In the U.S. most states are “Shall Issue” states. This means they will grant anybody a permit that meets certain guidelines such as being 21 or older and not having any felony convictions, a history of mental illness or domestic abuse. A handful of other states are “May Issue” states. In these other states, such as Maryland, a permit will only be issued if you can prove you need it. This can be a large obstacle and these states will usually only issue permits to people in the public eye, wealthy individuals that are well-connected or business owners frequently transporting large sums of cash (Concealed Carry Reciprocity Maps). Although the requirements and standards are different wherever you may live, one thing holds true- concealed carry permit holders are rapidly growing. The market for handgun training, concealed carry courses and smaller, more concealable handguns have opened up. When concealed carry was first gaining popularity there were two very different schools of thought. Some thought that violent crime would decrease, as criminals would fear the everyday person that just may happen to be armed. Others thought that having people carrying around concealed handguns in public would lead to an increase in violent crime with people losing their temper and shooting each other. When analyzing the data and crime trends, it is clear that with this influx of concealed carry permit holders there has not been a corresponding increase in violent crime.

    Read More

  • The Kalam Cosmological Argument

    1084 Words  | 3 Pages

    For the purposes of this debate, I take the sign of a poor argument to be that the negation of the premises are more plausible than their affirmations. With that in mind, kohai must demonstrate that the following premises are probably false:

    Read More

  • The Effects and Consequences of Gun Control

    2071 Words  | 5 Pages

    Lott, Jr. John R. More Gun Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. Print.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Just Take Away Their Guns By James Wilson

    931 Words  | 2 Pages

    The important question of how we should deal with gun control inflates more and more each and everyday. In his essay, “Just Take Away Their Guns,” author James Q. Wilson gives his unique solution on the issue of gun control. He emphasizes that his argument is not to disarm law-abiding citizens, but “to reduce the number of people who carry guns unlawfully” (Wilson 126). He uses a variety of strategies such as the use of tone and logic, to effectively support his claim, however the absence of sources leaves a hole in the argument to which the reader may question the validity of the argument.

    Read More

  • Gun Control Does NOT Reduce Crime

    2312 Words  | 5 Pages

    middle of paper ... ... Law enforcement and criminal imprisonment have more of an effect on crime than any gun control law. Gun education and hunter’s education also improved. Focusing efforts on the root of the problem has yielded results and lowered crime.

    Read More

  • Gun Control is NOT the Solution

    982 Words  | 2 Pages

    Central in the arguments against gun control is its ability to restrict any citizen of the United States the right to own guns which is protected under the constitution. Specifically, due recognition is made to its connection to the 2nd Amendment wherein it seeks to protect the individual liberties of people. This facet also applies to gun ownership regardless of the original objective and intention. “The second amendment from the Bill of Rights grants private citizens the right to bear arms. Thus, people who stand firmly against gun control insist that no legislation, technically, should have the right to take away a citizen’s guns without first repealing the amendment in question” (Groberman 1). A good approach to consider in highlighting this part comes from depriving the citizen of his basic right on the basis of specific presumption that it would be used for violence or crim...

    Read More

More about Gun Control: Open Carry Policy Is Not The Answer

Open Document