Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay gun control history united states mla scribd
Essay gun control history united states mla scribd
Effect of gun control
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay gun control history united states mla scribd
People have questioned gun control long time. Many people wonder if anyone, aside from those who join the law force, should be allowed to carry guns. Benjamin Franklin once said, “Those who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety” (Wright 4). Franklin understood that taking guns away from law-abiding citizens would not uphold their liberty. Some people who argue for gun control state many violent crimes involve guns. Others believe a child could find the gun and something bad could happen to the child or others when a gun is unsafely stored. People who argue against gun control might say there is a huge psychological gap between citizens who shoot to protect themselves or their property and those who go into schools and shoot at others. Criminals will always find a way around gun control laws and will be able to obtain and use guns illegally. The second amendment protects gun rights for individual citizens. Reasonable gun control laws and educational steps can be taken to protect the majority of U.S. citizens. Gun control does not only take guns away from criminals, gun control also limits law-abiding citizens from protecting themselves and their families when necessary. Those who argue for gun control usually state guns are a part of most violent crimes. However, this is not always true. While it is true that limiting gun ownership with laws could prevent individuals from possessing guns, it does not prevent people from illegally having or using guns. Those who carry guns legally are not the problem. According to Mark Gius, the author of “Gun Ownership and the Gun Control Index”, “…only about 25% of total violent crime is committed by a person using a gun, no inferences... ... middle of paper ... ... can be put into place so that gun control does not limit law-abiding citizens from keeping guns on their property or person and protecting themselves or others when necessary. Works Cited Gius, Mark. "Gun Ownership and the Gun Control Index." Atlantic Economic Journal 36.4 (2008): 497-98. Print. "Home Is Where The Gun Is." New Scientist 212.2835 (2011): 6. Academic Search Complete. Web. 22 Nov. 2013. Jacobs, James B., and Kimberly A. Potter. "Keeping Guns out of the ‘Wrong’ Hands: The Brady Law and the Limits of Regulation." The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 86.1 (1995): 93-120. Print. Trotter, Gayle S. "Independent Women's Forum." Congressional Digest Mar. 2013: 25-31. Print. Wright, Stephen E. "Gun Control Laws Will Not Save Lives." Guns and Crime. Ed. Christine Watkins. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 22 Nov. 2013.
Peterson, Eric. "The Consequences of Gun Control." Oklahoma Wesleyan University. The Keating Center, 18 Apr. 2013. Web. 28 Apr. 2014.
“It is estimated that there are 310 million non – military guns in America” (O’Brien and Stanton). Many people that own a firearm usually have more than one gun. Also, a majority of gun owners feel that owning a firearm is the best way to protect themselves at home. With the large number of guns said to be in America, there needs to be a way to prevent the number of frequently occurring mass shootings. The solution to this issue is called gun control. Gun control needs to be implied more in our society because gun related crimes are mostly committed by those diagnosed with mental illnesses, there is no contradiction with the second amendment, it has the ability to lower the amount of mass shootings in the United States, and universal background checks help prevent mass shootings.
Wintemute, Garen J., Anthony A. Braga & David M. Kennedy. “Private-Party Gun Sales, Regulation, and Public Safety.” The New England Journal of Medicine 363.6 (2010): 508-11. Academic Search Complete. Web. 10 Apr. 2014.
The second amendment to the US Constitution shows that it is unconstitutional to have complete and total gun control. The second amendment states that “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This means that it is the right of an American citizen, abiding by the constitution, has the right to bear arms. Currently, there are over three hundred and seven billion people residing as American citizens. Within the homes of these Americans, forty five percent have a registered gun in their household. As a diverse nation, there are many reasons why there are guns located within a household. Sixty percent stated the gun is used for protection against int...
Reducing gun violence in the United States has been an uphill battle for the government with arguments pending on how more gun control laws would help in decreasing the crime rate. While others argue that these laws make it harder for law abiding citizens to obtain guns in which they can protect themselves. Criminals are going to ignore the law and obtain guns any way thus, these harsh gun control laws will only hurt the law abiding citizen. Better enforcement of existing laws and dealing with crime itself as one issue is another argument many have also stated.
Over the last decade, gun control has been one of the hottest political topics nationwide. Those who support gun control believe that stricter gun laws reduce crime, while opponents of gun control believe that firearms are essential for self-defense. Both sides possess passionate views, and are usually unwilling to compromise their beliefs. What exactly is gun control? Gun control is a series of laws that limit the availability and ownership of privately owned firearms. Cliff Stearns, a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, claims that “Our society is a violent society. However, the innocent deserve access to the tools they need to defend themselves.” Gun laws should be relaxed in the United States because the 2nd Amendment prohibits the government from infringing on the right to keep and bear arms, a well-armed general population would deter the government from becoming abusive in the future, and finally, because access to firearms make it easier for people to defend themselves and their families.
Nevertheless, guns are very dangerous and they are used in all sorts of criminal activities already. Therefore, the benefits of having a gun outweigh the drawbacks of not having a gun. No matter what each individual’s beliefs are in regard as to whether gun control should or should not be enforced, the Second Amendment of the Constitution gives each person the right to bear
Guns and crime are two words that people tend to relate, some people say more guns means more crime, and others say less guns is more crime. One thing is for sure, the current gun control measures are not working. Two articles, one by John C Moorhouse and Brent Wanner, another one by William J vizzard, take this topic and convey their own opinion about it. In their article, “Does Gun Control, Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control”, Moorhouse and Wanner, come to the conclusion that Gun Control doesn’t reduce crime. Moorhouse and Wanner, believe that the current gun control measure fail to make any difference, on the contrary, more crime is increasing gun control. Likewise, “The Current And Future State of Gun Policy In The United
Gun control does not deter crime rates. In the twentieth century, gun ownership increased and the murder rate decreased. John R. Lott, Jr., the author of More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws, averred, “The problem with such [gun control] laws is that they take away guns from law-abiding citizens, while would-be criminals ignore them.” John R. Lott, Jr. stated, “States with the largest increases in gun ownership also have the largest drops in violent crimes... The effect on 'shall-issue' [concealed gun]
On November 30, 1993, the imperative Brady Laws were enacted. These laws required a 5-day waiting period on all gun sales so that in-depth background checks could be completed. Also, whenever multiple handgun purchases were to occur, they were now allowed to be reported to the police. People who were deemed mentally ill by the courts were not allowed to purchase weapons and American leaders emphasized that the laws may have in fact prevented gun violence from spreading. The Gun Control Debate, an academic journal that was released after the expiration of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban in 2004, Bob Adams states that, “deaths from firearms in the United States dropped sharply, from almost 40,000 in 1993 to 29,700 in 2002. And the number of licensed gun dealers dropped from 285,000 to 104,000 in three years.” Further analysis of these statistics show decreasing death rates from guns and decreasing gun supply after the enactment of the Brady Law and the Assault Weapons Ban, Adams sheds light on the positive effect these laws and regulations had on the overall well-being of this nation. The reinstatement of these regulations is essential and must be incorporated into future gun control propositions.
(Balanced Politics 1) Yes, most violent crimes are committed with guns, older and younger individuals have no means of other self-defense of rape or other crimes. There are many myths about thousands of children dying every year from gun accidents and that gun shows are the primary source for the illegal flow of firearms into the hands of criminals. (Nair 1) While Gun Control is important to ensure that gun safety is maintained, it is not fair that due to Gun Control an innocent victim is unable to protect him or herself. This in fact is a way of promoting crime as in no way does Gun Control help in
The controversy of gun control has always been a topic of interest of Americans for a long time. As many violent crimes, especially organized crimes in the 1930’s, were done with some sorts of firearms, attempting to lower the number of guns available for use seemed to be a logical solution to the problem. First account of gun control was the “National Firearm Act of 1934” (N/A, History of Gun-Control Legislation, 1). “200 dollars of tax was placed on the production of machine guns and sawed of shotgun.” During the time period, as organized crime was the primary source of crimes in the US, the gun law then wasn’t directed toward the citizens. Over 30 years later, gun control is once again a topic of debate as public figures such as President John F. Kennedy, his brother Senator Robert F.
Barry (2018) and researchers recently conducted a national study that compared the support for 24 different firearm policies between gun owners and non-gun owners. The results indicate that both gun owners and non-gun owners are in favor of restricting gun ownership for 23 of the 24 policies examined. Regardless of gun ownership status, both parties agreed that “universal background checks, greater accountability for licensed gun dealers unable to account for their inventory, higher safety training standards for concealed carry permit holders, improved reporting of records related to mental illness for background checks, gun prohibitions for persons subject to temporary domestic violence restraining orders” are all ways to reduce gun violence in society (Barry et al., 2018, p. 878). Interestingly, gun and non-gun owners are not on a partisan divide as the media portrays. On the contrary, both sides agree that tightening gun laws at the state level is a necessary step in gun ownership for the sake of public
In his study: Public Mass Shooters and Firearms, Adam Lankford found that: “Many of the nations in this study that ranked highest in firearm ownership rates also ranked highly in public mass shooters per capita” (8). Opponents of gun control think it is against the constitution that gives the right to everyone to own a gun, while in fact; putting restrictions on getting firearms will not break this right. It is like having a traffic system, which no one can say it is violating the freedom to move. Many also said that there is no gaurantee that gun control will not stop the school shootings, but studies about gun control in other countries say something different. Another research article states: “We find that state prevalence of firearm ownership is significantly associated with state incidence of mass killings with firearms, school shootings, and mass shootings” Towers et al 7). Many community leaders believe that owning guns is an essential part of American culture and restricting it will make them lose their identity. Nadia E. Nedze points out in her paper: Concealed Carry: The Only Way to Discourage Mass School Shootings: “ It would likely violate the Fourth and Fifth Amendments ’rights to freedom from warrantless searches, security in our houses, and protection from deprivation of
"There Should Be Stricter Gun Control Laws." Information Plus Reference Series Spring 2005. Ed. Sandra M. Alters, et al. Vol. 8: Gun Control: Restricting Rights or Protecting People? Detroit: Gale, 2005. 119-124. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 3 May 2014.