Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
the importance of grammar in education
the importance of grammar in education
the importance of grammar in education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: the importance of grammar in education
I have a knack for creating a series of run-on sentences and calling them an essay. I have a knack for beginning sentences with And or But. I also have a writing degree. I still have not mastered the use of the comma and somehow the Academy granted me that little piece of paper anyway. You, reader, may be wondering my point. My point is this: that despite my ill-formed paragraphs and run-on sentences I have existed and prospered within the formal writing environment. And so, I was elated to read Patrick Hartwell’s essay that contests that teaching grammar has a negligible effect on the development of a student writer (183).
Clearly, there are different types of grammar, which Hartwell distinguishes in his essay. Borrowing from Francis’ “The Three Meanings of Grammar,” and his lengthy definition of grammar in three parts, Hartwell extends to the five categories of grammar. In dissecting grammar, Hartwell divides and conquers the argument that formal grammatical training is of great use to a developing writer. Instead, Hartwell sees grammar as a recognition tool, a way to keep the writer and reader on the same page. It is a tool of orientation rather than a prerequisite for “good writing.”
Harvey Davis, an author I found by way of Hartwell’s end-notes, makes a great distinction between the necessity of grammar texts for educators and students. In his book, Famous Last Words: The American Language Crisis Reconsidered, Daniels recognizes that grammar books, “while they may be good for the publishing business, and may comfort anxious teachers, they are unlikely to help students much” (241). Books devoted to the teaching of grammar or the integration of grammar into writing programs simply create names for lessons and rules alread...
... middle of paper ...
...n of all threads of thought, with a process of shaping afterwards.
Grammar lay waiting for the guillotine in the arena of composition. The main concern of any composition teacher, as well as his students, should be the production of writing. Since the rules are so flexible and easily changed for matters of style, grammar should be an afterthought, rather than a pre-writing tool. To take writing time away from our students and force them to familiarize themselves with formal grammar does them a disservice.
Bibliography
Daniels, Harvey. Famous Last Words: The American Language Crisis Reconsidered. Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1983.
Hartwell, Patrick. “Grammar, Grammars, and the Teaching of Grammar.” Cross-Talk in Comp Theory: A Reader. ed. Victor Villanueva, Jr. Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English, 1997. 183-212
Perfection is not always the answer. I found myself wishing that I had Murray as a teacher. It would be interesting to see if writing badly actually makes ones writing experience different. Instead of policing the writing, Murray actually cares about what is actually being said and that shows that his students are important and that he cares about their voice. Readers can feel satisfied that there is at least one teacher who tries to understand and is actually doing something to change writing in his classroom. Murray finished his essay by saying, “What matters in the journey – at least initially – is not what kind of car you’re driving but where you end up.” This leaves the reader knowing that it is okay if you choose to write with perfect grammar the first time or write badly then go back and fix mistakes if you desire to do so. The readers leave with an extra tool to use when
Williams claims that errors of grammar and usage are the most complex topics, which have been easily misunderstood by many people in our world today. Whether the grammar has to do specifically with literature or not, it has always obtained errors. William notably supports his claim by giving specific examples of professionals who have stated grammatical errors according to what they think is “right.” William also provided some personal experience and textual evidence to express credibility and accuracy of his argument. William’s argument is effective because the main points he focused on with evidence were powerful and stood out to the audience. The real life examples that William demonstrated to the audience gave a strong base to his argument because he showed how grammar errors actually exist in our society. He made it evident that the audience had their eyes opened to topic that had been ignored in the past. William achieved his argument by providing real life situations and by looking at various researches that analyzed the existence of errors in grammar. However, the ways that William could have made his argument more effective is by not having comments that seemed too self- indulgencing. Also he could have taken out evidence like the graphs that didn’t make
Follett continues by explaining that although early descriptive grammarians were helpful, the activity of modern linguists is now harmful. Before linguists’ harmful activity began, early descriptive grammarians included men such as Henry Sweet who inspired the Danish scholar Otto Jespersen to produce A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. These men and their works were helpful by laying the foundation for traditional grammar. However, after these early grammarians, modern linguists introduced speechways, an idea which claims that writing and grammar books are artificial and unnecessary. This denial of the need of our need for grammar has proved harmful to the traditional foundations of
Cerjak ,The English Journal, Vol. 76, No. 5 (Sep., 1987), pp. 55-57 Published by: National Council of Teachers of English
Kolln, Martha. Rhetorical Grammar: Grammatical Choices, Rhetorical Effects. 2nd Ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1996.
... formulate their argument by first explaining the differences between the genres and acknowledging the opposing arguments. The author does this to answer any general questions the reader may have about such an english class and also provides the benefits. The author’s purpose to writing this piece was to persuade people that the way english classes are taught needs to be changed from covering general english subjects to introduction to different types of writing. The author believes students would benefit more from these classes and prepares them better for future classes and also writing in their professional careers.
These rules of language were stressed among students, with the hope that a solid grasp of abstract definitions would set them up with the tools needed to avoid errors in usage. But halfway through the 20th Century, research on the value of grammar education began to surface and there was no strong correlation between the teaching of grammar and a student’s ability to avoid usage errors, the once strict education structure was dropped. With traditional techniques abandoned, the vacuum was filled by new approaches. Structural linguistics, based around the importance of the way words form sentences, began to take the place of its predecessor but was then quickly challenged by transformational grammar, a more abstract concept than the prior two. With arguments from the structural and transformational side both pushing that the other was unscientific, the importance of grammar was abandoned. Though schools are beginning to reintroduce grammar in education, it has kept a firm separation between learning grammar and learning
I fully agree with the author’s agreement due to that I have seen the difference between grade school, high school, and college writing skills. In elementary school, children are being taught how the student’s state is requiring them to learn how to write an essay. Thus, allowing the students to have a firm foundation of technique and style, but little creativity when it comes to assignments.
Avoid purely communicative syllabuses (Long, 1991) in grammar teaching processes, communicative activities only will lead to insufficient English elementary grammatical knowledge.
In this essay I intend to investigate how differently one of the closed word classes, determiners, are approached in a series of pre and post corpus-based English grammar reference books, course books and practice books. And the theme of my investigation is how corpus affects the development of English teaching materials. The grammar reference books I intend to analyze and compare are “A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language” (ACGEL) and “Cambridge Grammar of English” (CGE). The former is an indispensable grammar reference book first published in 1985, which has been widely consulted in researches in relation to English linguistic studies, while the later offers clear explanations of both spoken and written English grammar based on authentic everyday usage.
The students sometimes make errors on the use of grammar when they produce an English writing, also in writing essay texts. It is because Indonesian and English have their own grammatical system. This problem may occur due to their lack of knowledge of English grammatical rules. Learning English is a necessity for some people. Learning English cannot be separated from learning grammar. Students sometimes make errors on the use of grammar when they produce an English writing. The students cannot avoid the grammatical errors in their writing. Sometimes, they do not pay attention to the errors they make and they do not know how to correct the errors. In this essay, our tried to focus on analyzing the grammatical errors in essay texts.
Shea, Renee, Lawrence Scanlon, and Robin Scanlon. The Language of Composition: Reading, Writing, Rhetoric. 2nd ed. Boston: Bedford St. Martins, 2013. 525-529,546-551. Print.
The grammar helps the students to understand the spoken speech. As and when the students understand the spoken language they will listen more to it. If the students of Bhutan are to enhance their listening skills they need to be competent in grammar knowledge. With an ability and knowledge of the grammar, he or she can easily understand the literal and technical meanings of the speaker. On other hand, the speaker too need good grammar knowledge to make the listener fully understand. Leggett & Mead (1978 p.18) have stated that, “If a grammarian’s description is good, these generalizations help guide us in using our language more efficiently”. The grammar is the key to open the language whereby the encoder and decoder shall have successful communication. With correct use of grammar rules the communicators enjoy the charm of language and its intentions. When there is enough content on grammar skills, one shall be in a position to acquire the meanings and flaws to which he or she can analyze and grape the charm of the public speech. Usually the people with sound grammar knowledge watches more movies and listen to the news. Even, they cherish listening to BBC news and update world news as they find easy to understand the meanings from it. Teaching of grammar is parts and parcels to love English language. Thus, the teaching and learning grammar is the silver bullet to enhance the listening
There are two core ways that teachers are suitable to teach grammar: deductively and inductively. Both deductive and inductive teaching has their positive and negative sides and which approach is useful depend on a number of factors, such as the nature of the language being taught and the preferences of the teacher and learners. These two approaches have been applied to grammar teaching and learning. A deductive approach involves the learners being given a general rule, which is then applied to specific language examples and learning goes through practice exercises. An inductive approach involves the learners working out a ‘rule’ for themselves before they practice the language.
Rather than teach grammar initially and hope that students connect their drilling exercises of subjects and verbs to the poem they’re working on, teaching the varieties of literature first allows students to gain first-hand experience and familiarity with grammar already in practice. This is not to say that grammar lessons and terminology should be lost altogether. A student will not be better off if they never learn subject-verb agreement. However, their exposure to examples of these uses should come first, leaving the labeling and grammar jargon to a time when their minds have already seen how these nouns and verbs can be used. That’s the key phrase: can be used. Students need to understand that they have control and authority over their work. They should have space enough to understand that although a sentence should be written in a certain way, it does not always have to be straightforward grammar if they’d like to change something stylistically. For example, while teaching a lesson on the poem "l(a" by E.E. Cummings, students might be confused and puzzled as to the form of this unusual piece. However, they should then be invited to challenge Cummings’s lack of traditional grammar and stylistic choices. Some may be angry at its unique appearance, while others may grasp the significance of the form and its effect on the reader.