Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature Review character education
Literature Review character education
The Christian philosophy of education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literature Review character education
“Through wisdom a house is builded; and by understanding it is established; and by knowledge shall the chambers be filled with all precious and pleasant riches.” Proverbs 24:3, 4
Education is vital in life. If we did not have education, no one would be able to do anything challenging with his or her minds, unless trained by experience. This is what Plato knew thousands of years ago. He knew education produced a balance and harmony of character. This education model is not seen in public education, except in the classical model, which borrowed many of his concepts. This kind of education, however, sought to bring out political men of who were capable to fight. As Christians, however, we should always seek in our education to glorify God, to articulate well our faith in the living God we know and love. This is what Plato’s education model lacked.
In his view of education, Plato observed that children absorb information like a sponges. He concluded that if good influence and habitation begins early, it would produce well-balanced citizens. He also concluded that character qualities must also start at an early age because children have not yet formed an understanding of right and wrong. These observations go with the Trivium’s view of education, in which many Christian Classical groups borrow. The Trivium observes, “Man has three mental capacities: One for gathering up information-knowledge. A second for arranging the information in a logical order- understanding. A third for putting this information and this ordering into practical use-wisdom.”
To achieve his observations of education, Plato formed his model of Literary, formal and musical educational method. He understood that children learn through literature the good and b...
... middle of paper ...
...nter of learning. Thus, Plato’s method left out the truths of God, the Trivium method puts God at the center, of which learning rotates around. Therefore, using the Trivium model will equip our children so that they can have skill and accuracy in sharing the truths of God’s word. This model seeks to glorify God while training a child to be resourceful, intelligent, and most importantly, have solid foundations in the word of God. This is true godly classical education.
Works Cited
Teaching the Trivium by Harvey and Laurie Bluedorn 2001 pg. 100
The Republic 1987 pg 69
Op.cit., pg. 89
Proverbs 22:6
The Republic pg. 110
Op.cit., pg 110
Teaching The Trivium pg 39
Trans. Lee, Desmond, 1987 The Republic, Penguin Classics
Bluedorn, Harvey and Laurie, 2001 Teaching the Trivium; Classical Homeschooling in a Classical Style Library of Congress
ABSTRACT: Antisthenes of Athens was an older student of Socrates who had previously studied under the Sophists. His philosophical legacy also influenced Cynic and early Stoic thought. Consequently, he has left us an interesting theory of paideia (reading, writing, and the arts) followed by an even more brief one in divine paideia, the latter consisting of learning how to grasp the tenets of reason in order to complete virtue. Once properly grasped, the pupil will never lose it since it is embedded in the heart with true belief. However, there is a danger of being confused by human learning, which may delay or obviate completing divine paideia. Nonetheless, with the help of a teacher who gives a personal example, like Socrates or the mythical Centaur Chiron, the pupil has a chance of reaching his or her goal. Through a series of myths, Antisthenes gives us the foundations of his logical and ethical theory together. Reasoning is both a way to grasp virtue and also to fortify it. Although he would have chaffed under a modern university educational system, we may learn from him to value concise philosophical studies as a necessary adjunct to basic lessons in liberal arts.
All over the world, people have always sought for power, they have struggled to defend their culture; they have worked beyond imaginable to obtain economic prosperity and political freedom. A matter of fact equality is something that nowadays we are still fighting to obtain. Education has always been the key to power. In the twenty-first century education means a way to obtain the American dream, in other words, to achieve success. However, schools were never intended to empower people to think for themselves or to help them succeed. At the beginning of the American school, different groups of people wanted different things to come out of schooling, one of those things was to facilitate reading the bible in the text it states that “Schooling became important as a means of sustaining a well- ordered religious commonwealth” (Spring 22).
	In Plato’s mind, the value of an education is to clear one’s mind of impure thought, bring it to a higher lever than at the start, and attain a certain level of righteousness. This may have been a good idea 2300 years ago, but today, I see it as very limiting and impractical. In his time, only the rich aristocrats went to school. It’s purpose was not for the students to learn skills or ideas that would help them later in life, but to expand their minds, thus making them into ‘better people.’ There was no need for them to learn any job skills. Back then, if you came from a rich family, you were rich. Working at simple jobs was for the peasants and slaves. Today, life is different. Our society is completely unlike that of the ancient Greeks. We have no caste system limiting the wealth and prominence of any citizen, we have no slavery to handle all the manual labor, our army is proportionately smaller and much less honored, and religion is a part of one’s private life, not a dominating public force as it was to the Ancient Greeks. Most people today have a regular, day to day job, whether it be in an office, store, factory, or anywhere else. We have to earn our wealth by working, not inheritance. That is why most people go to school today.
In our education system, a professor will be given lecture for hours to hundreds of students in some large universities with expectation to increase their knowledge. At the end of the day, some of them will drop, some will finish their major with a low GPA, and others will graduate with a good grade, but a few knowledges remain in their memories. As a matter of fact, some people can be holding their PhD without be able to help their children at home with a basic homework in physics. The education system teaches them how to learn. Nowadays, we even have classes to learn how to learn strategies; as a result, our students become often as product “prisoners” of our education system because in the education system that transfer knowledge, students learn to a score good grade. If we assume that students who work just for grade are prisoners in Plato’s metaphor, their teachers and parents are prisoners as well. In the school system, some teachers don’t have any love for their career or for their students; therefore, students are going to dislike the study and work just for passing grade because of lack of dialogue between students and teachers. This issue is well emphasis when “The underlying assumption of dialogue is that knowledge is not a finished product, but is rather shaped in praxis out of a context-dependent partnership
...n atheist might find the existence of a Creator incompatible with his life-long belief, and feel the clash between the truth and his philosophy in life unbearable. A devote priest would find the correctness of the evolution theory equally disrupting in his lifestyle and unacceptable. Another problem, though not extensively discussed in this report, is as relevant. Plato believed that less gifted people should not waste the society's and their own resources on learning and advancing to the 'Good'. Only the wisest would learn to become philosopher kings and receive education of the highest quality. This preposition rebels against everything discussed above and yields those less of a genius would inevitably lead less enjoyable lives. The happiest lifestyle would only be reserved to intelligent individuals. This introduces enormous contradiction and simply cannot stand.
To get a sense of what an education was intended for we must look at the ancient Greek society. The philosophers like the Sophist, Socrates, and Plato were a major part of the Greek society and the rest of the world. Take the Sophist for example, these scholars who would, for a fee, travel to give public lectures on such subjects as math, grammar, rhetoric, ethics and science. For the citizens, lectures were not only an educational experience, it was also considered a form of ...
Young people should not be permitted to read Plato’s Republic. In fact, the general population should not be allowed to read it either. This is arguably what most frustrated university students tend to think when they are asked to read this text. Although, it might please them to know that Plato feels exactly the same way as they do. Republic is a work that contains an abundance of lies, allegories and theories, all of which can be classified as falsehoods by Plato. Supposing Republic were to be evaluated by Plato as a story for young people, the presence of these falsehoods makes this dialogue one that children should not be allowed to read. This paper aims to evaluate Plato’s position by identifying excerpts from Republic which contain examples
For Plato, education was more fundamental than tradition or literature or civilization or culture, for education determined how all the others were to be acquired, appreciated, and criticized. Indeed, education and philosophy were, as they are now, intimately linked. The practice of philosophy in Plato's time as in ours, the business of philosophy, was teaching far more than it was system-building. In fact, if Plato was the author of a system of philosophy, by which we are to understand a coherent set of interrelated axioms and their mutual implications, then Plato was a profoundly unsuccessful philosopher. For Plato makes such a variety of different and incompatible statements about so many topics that more than two thousand years of scholarship has thus far failed to produce anything like the consensus about his so-called system that one finds among Aristotelians, for example, or even Marxists.
It is important note that those prisoners only saw shadows. But because of their captivity the appearance of the shadows is all they knew. That is their subjective reality. But when forced out into what is actually out there, the world changes. We believe what we know. But knowing isn’t seeing. This concept is relatable to education. As Pluto states the presence and ability to learn is in everyone, deep within their soul. But how students are taught, isn’t something that just you memorize, but something you experience. Pluto uses the simile to describe this idea. He states “ The instrument with which each learns is like an eye that cannot be turned around from darkness to light without turning the whole body.” (Plato, 1974, pg. 52). Education is the key to the fulfillment of reality. Education is what is teaching us what is not just learned, but what is real. We gain knowledge, but with that we also gain insight. Liberal education is bringing awareness to various aspects of life that we wouldn’t usually look at. Liberal education is there to teach us to go out and experience new ideas, new cultures, and new ways of thinking. And that what we need to experience life
The statement “philosophy of Christian education” contains much information to be unwrapped. The term philosophy literally means, in the Greek, “love of wisdom.” In this case, the study of philosophy involves a “critical study of the basic principles and concepts of a particular branch of knowledge” (Philosophy). My understanding of Christian education is what I hope to unveil in this brief document. A high-quality education of children must embrace a student’s intellect, spiritual nature, social life, emotional growth, and physical health. I see evidence for this in scripture as Jesus grew in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and man (Luke 2:52). The goal of education should be the training of children, in every area of their life, for adulthood. What makes my philosophy of education different from the secular world is the distinctively Christian biblical worldview. It is this biblical worldview that sets apart Christian education from the public schools in our culture because we address the spiritual dimension of children that the secular humanistic education denies.
In Greek mythology, Aletheia is the personified spirit of truth and sincerity. Pindar, an ancient Greek lyric poet, prayed to Alatheia “who art the beginning of great virtue” for protection of his “good-faith from stumbling against rough falsehood” (Atsma). Greeks’ worship of Alatheia emphasizes the sacredness of truth as the origin of all virtues. The Roman equivalent deity is Veritas, the mother of Virtue (Elissa). Veritas personifies the Roman virtue of truthfulness and honesty which every Roman aspired (“Roman virtues”). The aspect of virtue and honor embedded in truth sheds light on its role in ordinary life. Truth, according to Greek and Roman values, should not be limited to an abstract concept but be practised in real life. It demands moral human beings to examine themselves with honesty and sincerity: they should not “claim to know things [they] do not in fact know” and should “engage in scrupulous efforts to eliminate self-deception and prejudice from [their] worldview” (Lee). Just as Confucius argued, “[w]hat you know, you know, what you don't know, you don't know. This is true wisdom.” The courage to acknowledge one’s own fallacy is fundamental to the realization of the truth. Additionally, the virtue of truth requires people to interact with others with candor. Besides knowing the truth, everyone also has an
In the story of "Allegory of the Cave", Plato illustrates his concerning on humanity and education. By the meaning of "Allegory of the Cave", we understand the effect of education on us. Most of the people ignore the importance of teaching, and they seek to learn the knowledge of the book or other materials. Therefore, they don 't care the truth or ignore it, which leads the truth far from us. "Indeed, the very principle that education ought to be more concerned with drawing out various human potentials than with only depositing information into students owes its origin to Plato" (Burch 7). To improve people 's educational level, we should realize that what
Plato thought education at all levels should be the state’s responsibility. His reasoning was that the individual
I agree most with Socrates’ view of education; the foundation of education is self-awareness. Education gives us choice in what we believe and how we live. Education isn’t solely about understanding mathematics or becoming a decent writer; it’s also about becoming a mature human being that gives back to society and helps those who aren’t as fortunate. We must learn to make choices not just for individual betterment, but also for the betterment of those who don’t have the knowledge, status, or power to make
...ead of true knowledge. It is the function of education to lead people out of the cave into the world of light; education is also dependent upon the person who is willing to partake in the acquirement of knowledge. “The conversion of the soul,” says Plato, is “not to put power of sight in the soul’s eye, which already has it, but to insure that, instead of looking in the wrong direction, it is turned the way it ought to be.”