In this marvelous novel, Theophilus Msimangu gives us his one hope for his country. Msimangu says, “I see one hope for our country, and that is all white men and black men, desiring neither power or money, but desiring only for the good of their country, come together to work for it.” This is a powerful quote spoken by Msimangu which reflects among his character throughout the book. Msimangu hoped for people living in South Africa to forget race and to instead think of what would best help the country. Although South Africa has been on a rocky path, they do seem to have taken a turn on the right path, on the path to racial equality for all. Unfortunately, South Africa has not fully met Msimangu's ideas on which people of all races work together solely to help for the good of the country.
Msimangu is a strong important character, and throughout the book he seems to be the one character helping everyone through the times that everyone seemed to be going through. Msimangu is a young minister in Sophiatown, and he has a warm and generous attitude towards everything. When Kumalo must take the dreaded trip to Johannesburg, Msimangu guides him through his troubles while guiding the reader showing the troubles that Johannesburg seemed to be in because of the aparheid. Msimangu explained the political and social hardships that the black population faced during these times, which gave the readers a good understanding of the daily lives of the many citizens in South Africa.
Between the lines of the book, readers can infer that Msimangu is very knowledgeable of racial injustices that happen throughout South Africa. It is very obvious that South Africa is ruled by wealth, power and gripped upon by white suppressors. Msimangu believes th...
... middle of paper ...
...eems that a much clearer path may lie straight ahead. It does take time for the whole country to push away the idea of no racial segregation, but in time it will happen. The last places to push away racial segregation will be rural areas, as these areas are almost always reluctant to change. South Africa has hit some important milestones in its country's history of racial segregation. The first huge milestone was the abolishment of the apartheid, and then the election of Nelson Mandela, the first black president of South Africa. These important milestones have shown that South Africa is on the right track, but has not met the full standards that Msimangu has set a goal for. Fortunately, there will be a day in the future where this comes true, where white men and black men come together not for their own personal gain, but for the good of the country of South Africa.
...f South African language and culture, acknowledgement of the racial oppression in South Africa, past and present, that it was wrong and positive action is required to make it right, and finally that all South Africans are legitimate and enjoy full moral equality (“About – DA”). In order for all this to be possible, the state must ensure it does not compromise the freedom of the individual (“About – DA”).
“Brink reaches for that unexpected potent strand of Afrikaner thought: an almost religious repugnance toward governmental corruption. And by using a ‘very ordinary’ Afrikaner as victim, Brink proclaims that no one in South Africa is any longer safe (Redman 5).” Andre Brink’s powerful novel, A Dry White Season, was made into a film directed by Euzhan Palcy about ten years after it was written. Euzhan Palcy did an excellent job directing her film, which was intended to open the world’s eyes to the injustices being committed in South Africa as a result of the apartheid, and it is successful in doing so. However, it fails to reach out to the reader, as does Andre Brink’s novel on which it was based. The movie omits many characters and actions that take place in the book in its attempt to expose the political struggle in South Africa. But what it lacks is the personal struggle that is the main focus of the novel. The novel uses this strategy of personalizing the main character’s situation to involve the reader further than the film does- to the point that it leaves the horrible situation in the reader’s hands- both literally and figuratively. The reader must decide what to do with what has fallen into his or her lap.
Arthur Jarvis is extraordinary, for in his “Private Essay on the Evolution of a South African,” he admits that he knew nothing of South Africa. “From them [his parents] I learned all that a child should learn of honour and charity and generosity. But of South Africa I learned nothing at all.” (pg 207) As a young boy, he was blind and sheltered from the entirety and the truth of his so-beloved land. “One can read, as I read when I was a boy, the b...
In the book, No Future Without Forgiveness, it introduces that South Africa was one of a land that experienced the most profound apartheid and racial oppression. It stacked hundreds of years of oppression, hatred and killings between the blacks and whites. Fortunately, there are some great people helping South Africa out of the woods. The author of this book, Desmond Tutu, perfectly reconciled the conflict and contradiction in South Africa. Therefore, after reading this book, what I want to appeal is that people should have equal rights. Meanwhile, in this paper?s following analysis, I will discuss as the blacks, what unequal and cruel
...oned racial segregation has been prohibited. Everybody in South Africa now has an equivalent open door at home and at work to live agreeable, gainful lives. Nelson Mandela is one of the world's actual opportunity contenders, and his life and individual triumphs will be recalled long after the world has overlooked the wrongs of Apartheid.
Racism is never bound by culture, language, or even continents. It is an evil that spans the globe. The history of South Africa is of a culturally divided and fragmented society. The architects of apartheid took advantage of this splintered social order to create an institutionalized separation, dehumanization and enslavement of a people through laws and customs. However, freedom can be achieved when one voice has the courage to stand up against thousands, and inspires others to stand up for what is right and just. The ending of apartheid in South Africa allows people everywhere to never again accept a different definition of freedom depending on a classification imposed by another. South Africa has forged a bright future from the chains of the darkness of the heart – the darkness known as apartheid.
In apartheid South Africa, Mathabane witnesses violence in country from the whites and develops hatred and fear. “To me nothing, short of a white man, was more...
Race no longer count that much here in South Africa. People are now united. When it comes to politics, whether Whites, Blacks or Coloured, everyone is more than welcome to vote for any political party. When it comes to society people are mixed in terms of race. It is no longer like apartheid where people were separated because of race. The most common characteristics distinguishing various ethnic groups is ancestry, territorial, possession, language, forms of dress, a sense of history and religion. So people who belong to an ethnic group have ancestors that also shared the same culture which is norms, values and also beliefs. This means that culture started long ago and it moves from one generation to the other. People who belong to the same ethnic group stay in
...eriences of Johannesburg, with a few exceptions. These are the ones who break the customs because they do not believe in them: The man who helped Msimangu and Kumalo when they were walking without a bus, Jarvis and his about face, and the young boy who talked so interestedly with Kumalo. These exceptions are highlighted by Msimangu's words and represent the hope of South Africa.
Coster, P., & Woolf, A. (Eds.).(2011). World book: South Africa’s Anti-Apartheid Movement, (pp. 56-57). Arcturus Publishers: Chicago.
It can be easily stated that the apartheid movement bestowed cruel and unusual punishments upon the people of South Africa, in order to execute its purpose. However, apartheid could have not been carried out if they were not individuals who believed in its principles. In order to understand the National parties ideologies regarding the issue of apartheid, it is essential to acknowledge the history of Boer soc...
The difficulty in improving rural areas in South Africa is mainly because of the racial segregation that took place
...Originally, David uses his status as a white male in South Africa as his leverage and source of power, however, this tactic quickly fails and causes him to seek a new lifestyle. Lucy’s farm life introduces David not only to natural beauties but the strength people have to provide the services that they do such as managing a last resort animal aid center. By the end of his experiences, he learns that he does not belong in the environment that he used to surround himself with in the city, but that he enjoys himself when he has the company of animals and his daughter. His shift in standards of living and customs demonstrates the racial impacts of the apartheid. The connection between Lucy’s disgrace as the victim and David’s shame as the rapist demonstrates hardships both flaws. Each aspect of these flaws represents the difficulties of the apartheid in South Africa.
When reading J. M. Coetzee’s Disgrace, before delving into the character studies interwoven in this novel, it is essential to first understand the backdrop of Apartheid as an institution. Apartheid had a socioeconomic effect on the different cultural groups in South Africa that eventually affects the main protagonists in this novel. Disgrace, a novel by J.M. Coetzee, implies that David Lurie embodies the pre-arpartheid era, while Lucy represents post-apartheid.
The apartheid was a very traumatic time for blacks in South Africa. Apartheid is the act of literally separating the races, whites and non-whites, and in 1948 the apartheid was now legal, and government enforced. The South African police began forcing relocations for black South Africans into tribal lines, which decreased their political influence and created white supremacy. After relocating the black South Africans, this gave whites around eighty percent of the land within South Africa. Jonathan Jansen, and Nick Taylor state “The population is roughly 78 percent black, 10 percent white, 9 percent colored, and l...