False Identity in Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison

1810 Words4 Pages

In Ralph Ellison’s novel Invisible Man, one of Ellison’s greatest assets is his ability to bestow profound significance upon inanimate objects. During the narrator’s journey from the bar to the hole, he acquires a series of objects that signify both the manifestations of a racist society, as well as the clues he employs to deconstruct his indoctrinated identity. The narrator’s briefcase thereby becomes a figurative safe in his mind that can only be unlocked by understanding the true nature of the objects that lie within. Thus, in order to realize who he is, the narrator must first realize who he is not: that unreal man whose name is written in Jack’s pen, or the forcibly grinning visage of Mary’s bank.
The narrator’s briefcase itself is perhaps the most important of Ellison’s inanimate objects. While the influence of the briefcase is not in its being an overtly crude representation of an oppressive society such as, for instance, Mary’s bank, the briefcase nonetheless plays an important role in constructing the pillars of the narrator’s superimposed identity. After the Battle Royale scene, the narrator is finally allowed to make the speech he has prepared. During his speech, he makes the ‘mistake’ of using the phrase ‘social equality’ in place of the much more ambiguous term, ‘social responsibility.’ The narrator corrects himself amidst the jeers of the almost entirely white audience. He then continues with his speech, lauding the importance of friendship, extoling the necessity of docile mutual existence to the “thunderous applause” (31) of the audience. Pleased with the narrator’s attitude of implied submissiveness, the superintendent “come[s] forth with a package wrapped in white tissue paper” (32). He presents this mysterious ...

... middle of paper ...

...the chaos against which that pattern was conceived” (580). Here, the narrator is describing the process of discovering himself. Conceiving “a plan of living” (580) does not come independently; this plan must be patterned to succeed where a former plan had failed. In other words, the narrator must use the symbols of his old life—the contents of his briefcase—as the chaos against which a new pattern of living may be conceived. Therefore, it is only after the narrator shakes “off the old skin” (581), that he can declare that “the hibernation is over” (581). To leave the hole, to return to the world, the narrator has to learn from the objects who he is not; he had to realize “there is a death in the smell of spring” (580). To be reborn, as things do in springtime, something else must die; to emerge anew, the Invisible Man must leave behind the ashes of his former self.

Open Document