Fair Competition among Businesses

563 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The antitrust laws aim to

There are laws in place, by the federal government, to ensure there is fair competition among businesses. The laws create fairness through: prevention of monopolies, trade regulations, production ethics, and fixed and pricing. The significant anti-trust laws are: Federal Trade and Commission, Clayton Anti-trust act, Celler Kefauver act, and Sherman Anti-trust act. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), was created in 1914. The job of the FTC is to eliminate non-competitive business practices and to protect the consumers. During the Progressive Era, trust busting and trusts were very popular. Woodrow Wilson created the FTC, to help eliminate trusts. The Clayton Anti-trust act was created in 1914. This was created by the U.S. Congress to help the Sherman Anti-trust act. This act prohibited mergers and acquisitions that would eliminate the competition amongst companies. This also eliminated any price discrimination that would lessen competition. Attorney generals were able to enforce through prosecution the federal anti-trust laws. This act also regulated acquisitions from stock and tying ...

Show More
Related

  • To What Extent Did the Government Adhere to the Principles of Laissez Faire from 1865 to 1900

    1744 Words  | 4 Pages

    From 1865 to 1900, the federal government of the United States moderately adopted the laissez faire system. At first, the government did practice laissez faire for it did little except its necessary duties. However, by the 1870's it was violating laissez faire little by little with the small restrictions on railroads and companies. As time progressed, the federal government abandoned laissez faire, for it passed the Interstate Commerce Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act.

    Read More

  • Monopolies In The Gilded Age

    1325 Words  | 3 Pages

    Unfortunately, these monopolies allowed companies to raise prices without consequence, as there was no other source of product for consumers to buy for cheaper. The more competition, the more a company is forced to appeal to the consumer, but monopolies allowed corporations to treat consumers awfully and still receive their business. Trusts were bad for both the consumers and the workers, but without proper representation, they could do nothing. However, with petitions, citizens got the first anti-trust law passed by the not entirely corrupt Congress, called the Sherman Act of 1890. It prevented companies from trade cooperation of any kind, whether good or bad. Most corporate lawyers were able to find loopholes in the law, and it was largely ineffective. Over time, the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890, and the previously passed Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, which regulated railroad rates, grew more slightly effective, but it would take more to cripple powerful

    Read More

  • Trust-Busting: Theodore Roosevelt’s Effectiveness in Regulating Big Business

    1618 Words  | 4 Pages

    Before a series of antitrust acts and laws were instituted by the federal government, it was not illegal for businesses to use any means to eliminate competition in late nineteenth-century America. Production technology was now advanced to the point that supply would surpass product demand. As competition in any given market increased, more and more companies joined together in either trusts or holding companies to bring market dominance under their control (Cengage 2). As President Theodore Roosevelt was sworn into office in 1901, he led America into action with forceful government solutions (“Online” 1). Roosevelt effectively regulated offending business giants by the formation of the Department of Commerce and Labor, the Bureau of Corporations, and antitrust lawsuits.

    Read More

  • Laws for Fair, Balanced and Competitive Business Practice

    658 Words  | 2 Pages

    United States has several laws that ensure that competition among businesses flow rely and new competitors get free access to the market. These laws intend to ensure fair and balanced competitive business practices. However, there are times when some businesses will do anything to gain competitive edge. USA has strong antitrust laws that prohibit fixing market price, price discrimination, conspiring boycott, monopolizing, and adopting unfair business practices. The history of Antitrust laws goes back to 1890 when Congress passed Sherman Act. In 1914, Congress passed two more acts: Federal Trade Commission Act, and Clayton Act. With some revisions, these three acts are still core antitrust acts.

    Read More

  • The Wickersham Commission

    1548 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hoover form this commission and what was it to achieve. What was happening to cause

    Read More

  • Major Federal Anti-trusth Laws in the United States

    669 Words  | 2 Pages

    The anti-trust laws were set in place to promote vigorous competition but also to protect the consumer from unfair mergers and business practices. The first antitrust law that was passed by Congress is called the Sherman Act and is a “comprehensive charter of economic liberty aimed at preserving free and unfettered competition as the rule of trade” according to www.FTC.gov . Later in 1914 Congress passed two more laws, one creating the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTCA) and then the Clayton Act, which now create the three core federal antitrust laws that are still active currently. Although they have changed over the last hundred years, they still have the same concept: “to protect the process of competition for the benefit of consumers, making sure there are strong incentives for businesses to operate efficiently, keep prices down, and keep quality up” as stated by the FTC.gov website on The Antitrust Laws.

    Read More

  • The Change of Labor Movement during Industrialization

    888 Words  | 2 Pages

    Additionally, in an effort to establish and standardize fair trade practices in interstate and international commerce, the government enacted laws that were directed toward labor unions and the labor relations process. These laws have either benefited or were detrimental to labor organizations.

    Read More

  • The Progressive Reformers

    1047 Words  | 3 Pages

    middle of paper ... ... Also, some railroads gave special rates to some shippers in exchange that the shippers continued doing business with the railroad company. In the Clayton Antitrust Act, it said no one in commerce could regulate rates of price between different buyers (Document E). It said that otherwise, this would create a monopoly in any line of commerce. However, the Elkins Act of 1903 pushed heavy fines on the companies that did that.

    Read More

  • American History Terms

    513 Words  | 2 Pages

    9. Sherman Anti-Trust Act – 1890 – forbade combinations in restraint of trade, without any distinction between “good” and “bad” trusts.

    Read More

  • Doubtful Trust In Baseball

    1232 Words  | 3 Pages

    Anti-trust laws have had a colorful history in the United States. The earliest anti-trust law was created primarily by Senator John Sherman in 1890. It was signed by President Benjamin Harrison and put into effect, and today is the root of all anti-trust legislation. The Sherman Anti-Trust Act was used extensively during the Progressive era by "trust busters" such as Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and Woodrow Wilson. The Standard Oil Company (headed by John D. Rockefeller) and the United States Steel Corporation (headed by Andrew Carnegie) were among the giants that fell to the wrath of the anti-trust acts. If these mammoth firms could not stand up to the anti-trust policies, what protected baseball from falling to them as well?

    Read More

  • Industrial Trusts In The Gilded Age

    1350 Words  | 3 Pages

    One important effort was the Sherman Antitrust Act, which was passed by Congress in 1890, and it required the gov’t to pursue trusts that

    Read More

  • Progressivism

    1908 Words  | 4 Pages

    Anti-Trust policy of 1902 pledged government intervention to break up illegal monopolies and regulate corporations for

    Read More

  • Sirius and XM Satellite Radio as a Monopoly

    798 Words  | 2 Pages

    The U.S. constitution and the Sherman Anti-Trust act has very little to do with laws but more so to eliminate the concept of no competition. If the merger between XM and Sirius was approved, it would be allowing two large corporate entities that have already established a large portion of the customer base within their field of expertise.

    Read More

  • Equilibrium in the Market

    1200 Words  | 3 Pages

    As with all markets and their respective economies, having equilibrium is one of the key factors of a successful system. Although most markets do not reach equilibrium, they attempt at getting close. There are numerous methods devised to reach equilibrium, whether they involve human intervention directly or a cumulative decision by all factors involved. These factors may be a seller's willingness to lower overall revenue, or a buyer's willingness to withhold some demand for a certain product. Of course, the basics of supply and demand retrospectively control the equilibrium in the market.

    Read More

  • Advantages And Disadvantages Of Perfect Competition

    743 Words  | 2 Pages

    In a perfectly competitive market, the goods are perfect substitutes. There are a large number of buyers and sellers, and each seller has a relatively small market share. Perfect competition has no barriers to information regarding prices and goods, meaning there is no risk-taking behaviour – sellers and buyers are rational. There is also a lack of barriers for entry and exit.

    Read More

More about Fair Competition among Businesses

Open Document