Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics
impact of company social responsibility on the society
impact of company social responsibility on the society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Evaluation: Ethical Perspectives on Social Responsibility
This paper evaluates Cohen’s article on social responsibility and considers how his perspective and ideas align in comparison with other management experts including Drucker and Friedman. Some key components that are included in the evaluation are:
• A definition of the concept of social responsibility.
• What Cohen identifies as the social responsibility of a business to the workers, stakeholders, and society as a whole.
• How Cohen’s perspective of the social responsibility of business aligns with the perspective of Drucker.
• How Cohen’s opinion of the social responsibility of business compares with the opinion of Friedman.
• Finally, an identification of which of the expert opinions best aligns with the current business climate promoting a ‘green environment and why.
Social Responsibility
The basic definition of social responsibility is that all companies should embrace more than just the focus of maximizing profits, and should have as part of their business model the goal to have a positive impact upon the society in which they operate. (Investopedia, 2014) Some businesses believe that social responsibility can only be applied to individuals and not to a corporation or business entity, and that the social responsibility of business is only to maximize the profits of the company for the shareholders of the organization. By maximizing the profits of a business, society as defined by these companies, is benefiting because the business is successful adding value to the entire society in which the company is operating.
Cohen’s Beliefs
Cohen was a student of Peter Drucker and thus understandably his beliefs on social responsibility align with those of Druck...
... middle of paper ...
....iisd.org/business/issues/sr.aspx
Knowledge@Wharton. (2012). Why companies can no longer afford to ignore their social responsibilities. Time, May 28
Mackey, J. (2011). What conscious capitalism really is. California Management Review, 53(3), 83-90.
Krishan, G.V., & Wei, Y. (2012). Do small firms benefit from auditor attestation of internal control effectiveness? Auditing, 31(4), 115-137. doi:10.2308/ajpt-50238
Rethinking the social responsibility of business. (2005) Retrieved on April 11, 2014 from http://reason.com/archives/2005/10/01/rethinking-the-social-responsi/print
Saco, R.. (2008). Social Irresponsibility. Journal for Quality & Participation, 31(3),39-40.
Social Responsibility Definition. (2014). Definition of ‘social responsibility’. Retrieved on April 11, 2014 from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/socialresponsibility.asp
Milton Friedman, who was a prominent economist, wrote a thought-provoking article in the New York Times Magazine in 1970 on the subject: social responsibility and ethics in strategic management. The one end of the economic policy spectrum, Adam Smith, influences Freidman. Smith embraces the knowledge that consumer and producer control the stability of the economy. This is based on free market equilibrium. Freidman most renowned quote is “There is one and only one social responsibility of business-to increase its profits.” The above quote clearly state his opinion on the concept of social responsibility. Freidman argues against the concept of social responsibility and his reasoning’s of corporations having one responsibility that is to make money, which has made him quite legendary.
...Foundational Considerations in the Corporate Social Responsibility Debate’, Business Horizons, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 9-18.
To understand this issue from both sides, it is also important to gain a perspective from the corporate finance world. Understanding that the goal of a corporation is to maximize the profits of its shareholders, H.B. Fuller really did not have a social obligation. If, howe...
Ciulla, J. B., Martin, C. W., & Solomon, R. C. (2007). Is "The Social Responsibility of Business... to Increase Its Profits"? Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory. Honest work: a business ethics reader (pp. 217-253). New York: Oxford University Press.
The first discussion question posed was, “How does Dr. Friedman characterize discussions on the “social responsibilities of business”? Why (Jennings, 2009, p. 79)? Friedman (1970) characterized the discussions on social responsibilities as one hundred percent unadulterated socialism. Friedman (1970) characterized these discussions in that manner because he felt that a corporate executive should focus solely on making profits and not on social aspects. He mentioned how people who conduct and express themselves in this fashion are positively reinforcing and supporting the actions of individuals that have been weakening the foundational blocks of free society. Friedman (1970) posed a question which was the crux of his 1970 article “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits” where he investigated the true contextual meaning of what responsibilities mean to businesses. Friedman describes how businesses cann...
Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to make Profit. New York Times
Friedman’s views are that business’ main responsibility is to maximize shareholders wealth and that in doing so, they are being socially responsible. He also contends that corporations are not people and therefore they cannot be responsible for social issues.
The article “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits” is written by a famous economist Milton Friedman. Friedman in this article implies that shareholders are the main drivers of the corporations and he believes that it is to them corporations must be socially responsible to. The goal of any corporation is to maximize profits and return the portion of these profits to shareholders for investing in the corporation. The shareholders can themselves decide which social causes to take part in rather than assigning a corporate executive to decide on their behalf. Friedman argues that a corporation must have no social responsibility to society because its only concern is the increase profits for itself and its shareholders.
So before we go in greater detail on the different perspectives related to social responsibility, one might question the meaning of social responsibility. It is generally agreed that social responsibility is defined as the business obligation to make decisions that benefit societ...
Social responsibility is the part of the framework of an organization or individual which makes up an obligation to act for the benefit of society. There are many different ways act out social responsibility. The social responsibilities of a business can be classified according to the businesses relationships to the general public, customers, employees and investors. The companies that make their product or service with the rooted mindset of benefiting the community and the world around them do this by providing things like scholarship funds, all natural products, biodegradable storage, and or just by treating the consumer as well as the employees as individuals rather than a corporate dollar sign. Businesses may exercise
Covey & Brown (2001) “the role of business in society has progressed over the years, from being primarily concerned with profit for sharehold¬ers to a stakeholder and community approach with a focus on corporate social responsibility”
Social responsibility allows for the market system to be centrally controlled by forcing shareholders to unwillingly contribute to social responsibility. While this idea of social responsibility may help companies in the short run, it will ultimately hurt them in the long run. Each person has their own values and responsibilities and “society is a collection of individuals and of the various groups they voluntarily form” (55). Businesses, as Friedman understands, are separate from this society since individuals are the only ones who can hold values and responsibilities. Subsequently, businesses are freed of the need to embed social responsibility into their practices and should focus only on creating the largest profit possible for their shareholders
While the concept of an individual having responsibility is commonly recognized, modern views have lead to the emerging issue of corporate responsibility. Business Directory.com defines corporate social responsibility as, “A company’s sense of responsibility towards the community and environment (both ecological and social) in which it operates. Companies express this citizenship (1) through their waste and pollution reduction processes, (2) by contributing educational and social programs, and (3) by earning adequate returns on the employed resources.” But such a concept has been much disputed since at least the 1970’s.
Reed, B. (2011). The Business of Social Responsibility. Retrieved from Dollars and Sense Real World Economics: http://www.dollarsandsense.org/archives/1998/0598reed.html
Now-a-days it is considered that CSR is one of the major concerns of organization’s business ethics. Companies increasingly increase their corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethical management accepting the positive impact on the bottom line. The vast bulk of Standard & Poor’s 500 companies publish sustainability reports unfolding their program challenges and achievements. These pre-emptive efforts can pr...