cosmopolitanism

1697 Words4 Pages

Introduction
Cosmopolitanism is a Western concept that summarizes the needs of social agents to understand political and cultural values, larger than his home country on a global level. Cosmopolitanism is an ancient Greek word which means citizens of the world. In recent years cosmopolitanism has got a considerable importance and scholars of cosmopolitan thinking about the mutual responsibilities are arising in the global and International World. Cosmopolitanism promotes positive treatment towards differences, having great desires to construct a broad devotion and peaceful global community of citizens who should be able to communicate across cultural, social boundaries and universal solidarity.
According to German scholar Voltaire in a characteristic conversation of the ideal “Cosmopolitans… regard all people of the earth as so many branches of a single family, and the universe as a state of which they, with too many other rational beings, a citizen, promoting together under the general law of nature, the perfection of the whole, while each in his own fashion is about his own well-being” (1784 p. 241, Appiah, 2006, Ethics in a World of Strangers, p.13). The French scholar Wieland spoke fluently of obligations to understand those people with whom we share the planet, linking that need clearly with our global economic interdependence. “Fed by product of their soil, dress in their fabrics, amused by the game they invented, instructed by their ancient moral fables, why we would neglect to understand the mind of this nation, among whom our European traders were traveled ever since they could find a way to get to them” (Tauscher Merkur, August 1788, p.107, Appiah, 2006, Ethics in a World of Strangers, p.13,).
According to Daniel Archbu...

... middle of paper ...

...icular peoples that shapes our moral lives of global responsibility and make us effective world citizen.
Appiah theory encourages of following both local and universal loyalties and devotion and refuse that they are necessarily coming into the conflict of each other’s. As we look at the world, there are different way of life and thought and all disagreement cannot be resolved, but we have to accept the differences and embrace pluralism. Cross cultural conversation about cultural values do not have the ability to end in disagreement, but it is possible to agree even though we do not know the reason behind it. He gives the example of war between US and Iraq and says that the war has not been started due to the reason that the cultural values of the people of both countries are different, but the reason was that the politicians in the US accept war not the dialogue.

Open Document