Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion for zoos should be banned
Benefits of zoos
Controversy of zoos
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion for zoos should be banned
Zoos attract hundreds of thousands visitors every year that range from newborns to the elderly as they tend to fascinate and provide entertainment for them. Although zoos provide enjoyment of a lifetime there are people who defend that zoos are not as exceptional as they seem. Through many controversies, organizations such as “People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals” have arised advocating zoos are not beneficial to communities but in fact harmful, yet advocates that zoos are beneficial counter them. The members of PETA argue that the animals in zoos and suffer immensely from poor physical and mental health. On the contrary, promoters of zoos say that many species are saved from going extinct through zoo's extensive help in species-survival …show more content…
Millfield School graduate Damian Aspinall in a newspaper article for the Daily Mail argues, “ In the wild, these creatures roam hundreds of miles. They hunt their prey, raise their offspring and enjoy complex social relationships … Little wonder they develop self-destructive behaviours known as 'zoochosis' - repetitively walking in tight circles, rocking, swaying and sometimes mutilating themselves … All too often they are left on permanent display with nowhere to hide. They have no shade, little shelter, no privacy at all … If zoos are really being honest with the public about their motives, why are 75 per cent of the animals they keep not even endangered?” (1-3). Zoos are shown as having a …show more content…
In an article Jeremy Hooper, University of Tennessee graduate and advocate of the Red Wolf Species Survival Plan explains, “The AZA approved the red wolf for the SSP program in 1984, leading to the development of a new management plan to ensure the persistence of a ‘healthy, genetically diverse, and demographically varied captive population’ … The Red Wolf Species Survival Plan (RWSSP) initiated a network of facilities across the country with a common goal of restoring the red wolf to its native range. This network provided more space for housing red wolves, increased opportunities for breeding and research, and a broader outreach campaign ... In 1987, ten years after the first pups were born in captivity and seven years after the species was declared biologically extinct in the wild, eight red wolves were released into Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge in eastern North Carolina”(2-4). This one example is a part of many successful species-survival programs that are orchestrated by organizations of zoos. The red wolf was a species that became extinct in the wild. Since they were extinct in the wild that proves that zoos were beneficial to the community because rather than going completely extinct they were instead reintroduced in the wild with zoos help. Reintroducing a species as no small feat either.
Professor Livia Dobutsu from the University of Newcastle says: “Although we all know that zoos are very beneficial to the wild and saving endangered species, the fact
Have you ever seen an animal sitting in a cage all alone with nothing to do. Well, zoos are trying to change that fact. They will allow the animals to live in an environment that is like their home. Many people don't realize this, but zoo are keeping and breeding these animals because they would not survive in the wild alone. In the three passages, ¨The Stripes Will Survive,¨ ¨The Zood Go Wild from No More Dodos,¨ ¨Our Beautiful Macaws and Why They Need Enrichment.¨ All of these articles present one claim, that is that the role of zoos is no longer to keep animal, but to protect them.
It’s always fun to go with your friends and family to see cute and exotic animals when you go to the zoo, right? You may think that they have the best life having people to give them things that want and to protect them, but some of them are actually suffering just for our amusement from being in that small enclosure all day and all night. Animals should not be put in zoos because they can develop many mental and physical health problems due to the absence of some natural necessities and they are not always treated as nice as you think.
Zoos have been with us throughout our history, and can provide a good barometer of public beliefs and values at any given time. Therefore it seems necessary to explore whether in today’s society contemporary zoos are a means of educating and conserving or still seek to control and exhibit animal others for human benefit. In order to make this assessment there are a number of contributing factors. Firstly it is important to establish context by considering the history of zoos and looking at the changes from the early menageries to contemporary zoos who strive to be institutions of refuge for animals facing twenty-first century global challenges. This links into how the physical space of zoos has changed over time and whether these advancements have made any crucial difference to the welfare of animals. Following this conservation, education and scientific research will be explored in detail in order to assess whether they provide good enough motives for keeping animals in captivity. I will seek to argue that although attempts have been made to point zoos in the direction of conservation and education, in my opinion the concepts of dominance and human superiority are still at the core of modern zoos.
Animal cruelty is the abuse or failure to care for an animal. Before the past couple of years, people did not have to worry about how the animals in zoos were treated. For centuries, families have gone to zoos to be educated on the different species of animals. As years have gone by, zoos have become a trending topic of animal cruelty. While zoos do not physically abuse the animals, they have been known to not properly care for them. “According to the American Zoo and Aquarium Association (AZA), there are over 10,000 zoos worldwide” (Fravel 2). Of these 10,000 zoos, only some of them actually care about their animals. Caring for wild animals is extremely hard because zoos have to recreate the animals’ natural habitat. Zoos believe that they are protecting the animals’, yet; they tend to forget how it affects the animals. In reality, the animals are depressed and bored. These wild animals are being taken out of their natural habitats and are enclosed in small cages and habitats. Wild animals should live in their natural habitats, the wild, not in a zoo for the entertainment of zoo visitors. Therefore, banning zoos will end the horrible cycle of animal cruelty.
Analysis of Argument for Ethical Zoos and How They Benefit Animals Due to the recent events in the Cincinnati Zoo, arguments have been sparked about the ethics of zoos. Most articles try to argue against zoos and closed environments, but there are those that still support zoos and the programs that they provide for endangered species. The argument “Zoos Are Not Prisons”? They Improve the Lives of Animals” focuses on the positives of animal enclosures and fights for support to keep zoos in business. The author, Dr. Robin Ganzert, ties examples of programs that zoos help create and what type of research is conducted in the zoos, to support his claims.
Among many other fun and exciting attraction to visit around our community, a visit to the zoo has always been a memorable experience. This cost effective priceless lifetime experience is being undermined by a group of activists all around the country. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), world largest animal rights organization, argue that zoos deprived animals from satisfying their most basic needs. They urge not to patronized zoos and claims that the money spent on ticket purchases pays for animals to be imprisoned and traded, not rescued and rehabilitated. They go on saying in summary that zoos strip animals from their rights. So this heated debate revolves around the animal rights and how the zoo industry inhibits it. Are zoo really bad for the animals? Should we get rid of the zoo and let the animals back to the wilderness? Mazur and Clark (2001) state that zoo is a monument to a long-standing tradition of people’s fascination with non-human nature. Since the early societies of the Egyptians, Greeks, and Chinese, wild animals have been maintained in captivity in order to satisfy human curiosity with exotica (p 185). Most western zoos today, however, embrace far more benevolent values such as supporting the conservation of biodiversity through specialized animal breeding, research, and education programs.
A memorable experience for both young and old, zoos have educated and entertained visitors for decades; however, zoos have been criticized, especially by animal rights activists. These critics say that zoos don’t provide for all the animals’ needs found in their natural habitat. Are zoos worldwide assisting animals, or are the animals better off in the wild?
Since approximately 1250 B.C., ancient Egyptians had created and practiced the capture and display of animals in what are now known as zoos (Fravel). Records describe such exotic animals as birds, lions, giraffes, and tigers in captivity (Fravel). Since then, zoos have continued to entertain millions with the exciting chance to view exotic animals up close and personal. Even in ancient Greece, exotic animals were on display in fighting arenas, and in enclosed viewing areas. Originally in America, zoos were just created so that royalty and the wealthy could flaunt their exotic animals to the public (Leolupus). Today, with species threatened and habitats disappearing worldwide, zoos are serving a new purpose other than the mere exhibition of animals – conservation. (Fravel). When you think of a zoo, you either think of a fun, entertaining place that provides close-up and exciting exhibits of wild animals that you would otherwise never get the chance to see, or a place where people keep suffering, unhappy animals captive just for entertainment and display. However, despite whichever view you hold, and despite the stereotypes, some zoos have evolved to serve alternative and helpful purposes. Although some zoos face controversy due to allegations such as lack of space and quality care, neglect, and cruelty, some zoos have programs specifically designed to help and protect animal species. For example, these zoos have programs that help such conservation efforts as breeding.
Some people may argue that zoos protect animals and species under this polluted world, however, do animals in zoos really need our “help”? Yes, but surely not that many. According to Captive Animals Protection Society (CAPS), 79% of animals in United Kingdom zoos and over 70% of elephants in European zoos are wild-caught. It seems that zoos need them rather than they need zoos.
"Do We Need Zoos?" : An All Creatures Animal Rights Article. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 May 2015.
Every year, accredited sanctuaries have to turn away hundreds of exotic and wild animals made homeless by circuses, roadside zoos, and the “pet” trade. While a few zoos, such as the Detroit Zoo and California’s Oakland Zoo, have made the compassionate decision to provide animals who are truly in need with refuge, most zoos reject these animals. The zoo industry must transform itself from a prison to a refuge, where the rights and welfare of individual animals are given the highest priority. Let your local zoo know that the public will support such change by urging it to stop all breeding in order to offer greater space to fewer animals and to make room for wild animals who are confiscated from backyard cages, basements, circuses, and roadside
Zoos have been around for centuries. In the past zoos were a simple collection of animals in cages. Many animals in the early 200’s were diseased and treated poorly. Zoos today are very different modern zoos were diseased and treated poorly. Modern zoos pride themselves as centers for scientific studies and research.
Zoos are in a struggle of survival because they are very experience to maintain; every animal has special needs and zoos do not receive a large amount of money and are in lack of funds. They have helped many animals by sheltering them and helping them recreate their original habitat. Some zoo experts predict that zoos, as convinced today, could disappear someday (“Zoos Face the Challenges”). While some people see zoos negatively, zoos provide valuable resources for society because even though zoos are expensive to maintain they offer many programs to citizens, allow people to see animals in their natural environments, and protect endangered species. Zoos are ranked last on the list of priorities to our community because they are just considered a center of entertainment which is not really necessarily important. Expansion, remodeling, and maintenance cost is extremely expensive at a time when economy is faced with many problems that make
Another reason why people support zoos is because they help animals have a steady food source, no predators and no competition for female mates (Source E). While this life may seem nice for a human, the zoo takes away everything in a natural environment and it is unclear to what the animals want. The education zoos offer is more hands on and connective than books or television, making the experience and education better for those who cannot travel to the animals natural habitat. Even though zoos are not all bad and offer educational experiences and conservation, the benefit to society zoos contribute does not outway the harm it causes to the