Xenotransplantation And Animal Cruelty

992 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Biomedical ethics animal testing

Scientists must recognize pigs are a primary resource for xenotransplants because a large supply of pigs can be grown under standardized conditions. Pigs are efficient to harvest because “their early sexual maturation and frequent large litters” allow them to produce “a significant number animals” (Slasman, 2003). The rapid breeding of pigs provides doctors with a large selection of pigs to choose from when a patient needs an organ or tissue. Doctors can choose a pig suitable for their patient or coordinate procedures. For instance, if one patient needs a skin graft, while another patient needs a heart, the pig can be harvested to serve multiple purposes. This protocol will ensure the pig's body is used to its maximum potential. In addition …show more content…

Ethical implications of genetically modifying, breeding, and killing pigs with the purpose of transplanting organs and tissues to benefit humans is questioned. Fox (1996) proposed a moral question regarding ethical concerns, “how do we morally balance animal suffering and human benefit because their genetic makeup and behavior is close to humans?”. Additionally, critics believe pigs do not have the ability to oppose being genetically modified and sacrificing their life to save a human’s is morally wrong. Because of ethical concerns, many believe xenotransplantation is animal cruelty. However, these animals have great potential in curing diseases and saving lives. This leaves people questioning what is more unethical, using pigs to save lives or allowing people to die. After consulting with countless doctors, Beschorner (2013) states “pig organs in particular offer a variety of advantages”. Pigs could potentially cure the organ shortage because the abundance of healthy and sanitary organs that are available for transplantation. The pigs used for these procedures will be used to their full potential. Also, the doctors can choose a pig that is the most suitable for their patient. In addition, the genetic modifications of pigs creates new opportunities such as curing rejection, curing diseases, and creating perfect pigs to save lives. Therefore, pigs should be used for xenotransplantation because pigs cure severe medical conditions and can save countless human

Show More
Related

  • The Horrors of Animal Testing

    531 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every year over 100 million animals die in the US; the cause for these deaths, animal testing. This injustice to animals involves testing products such as medical drugs or makeup, on poor imprisoned animals that don’t have the ability to stand for their own rights as most of us do. Animals used for testing are given products that may result in burning, poisoning, or death. These animals are forced to live in confined spaces where they wait until the next horrible experiment. They are, tortured beyond imagination as they are sometimes even cut open while they are alive (know as vivisection), either with expired analgesics or even without them.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Therapeutic Cloning

    1154 Words  | 3 Pages

    Therapeutic cloning is the process whereby parts of a human body are grown independently from a body from STEM cells collected from embryos for the purpose of using these parts to replace dysfunctional ones in living humans. Therapeutic Cloning is an important contemporary issue as the technology required to conduct Therapeutic Cloning is coming, with cloning having been successfully conducted on Dolly the sheep. This process is controversial as in the process of collecting STEM cells from an embryo, the embryo will be killed. Many groups, institutions and religions see this as completely unacceptable, as they see the embryo as a human life. Whereas other groups believe that this is acceptable as they do not believe that the embryo is a human life, as well as the fact that this process will greatly benefit a large number of people. In this essay I will compare the view of Christianity who are against Therapeutic Cloning with Utilitarianism who are in favour of Therapeutic Cloning.

    Read More

  • Animal Cloning In Frankenstein's Cat

    831 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even though natural born animals present a higher survival rate, cloned sheep and cows show different results. Even if the cloned cows and sheep show a positive sign of survival, most of the cloned animals’ die either in the womb or after the clone exits the womb. (Anthes 63). Through this example, death dominates the choices of these cloned animals, and scientists continue the experiments for the benefits of humans. By focusing on human needs, the scientists pretend that animal welfare means absolutely nothing, but animals deserve safety just like humans. If scientists truly believe that cloning meets moral standards, than how come scientists cannot find a more effective way to decrease the failure rate of

    Read More

  • The Ethics of Animal Use in Biomedical Research

    1849 Words  | 4 Pages

    Both in and out of philosophical circle, animals have traditionally been seen as significantly different from, and inferior to, humans because they lacked a certain intangible quality – reason, moral agency, or consciousness – that made them moral agents. Recently however, society has patently begun to move beyond this strong anthropocentric notion and has begun to reach for a more adequate set of moral categories for guiding, assessing and constraining our treatment of other animals. As a growing proportion of the populations in western countries adopts the general position of animal liberation, more and more philosophers are beginning to agree that sentient creatures are of a direct moral concern to humans, though the degree of this concern is still subject to much disagreement. The political, cultural and philosophical animal liberation movement demands for a fundamental transformation of humans’ present relations to all sentient animals. They reject the idea that animals are merely human resources, and instead claim that they have value and worth in themselves. Animals are used, among other things, in basic biomedical research whose purpose is to increase knowledge about the basic processes of human anatomy. The fundamental wrong with this type of research is that it allows humans to see animals as here for them, to be surgically manipulated and exploited for money. The use of animals as subjects in biomedical research brings forth two main underlying ethical issues: firstly, the imposition of avoidable suffering on creatures capable of both sensation and consciousness, and secondly the uncertainty pertaining to the notion of animal rights.

    Read More

  • Xenotransplantation and Its Dangerous Affects

    514 Words  | 2 Pages

    The medical procedure of Xenotransplantation, (transplanting animal organs into humans) has been happening for many years, this medical practice was proceeding mixed results and mixed views regarding the procedure. In the year 1984, a baby girl whom was named Baby Fae by medical staff, became known world wide for the medical procedure she endured. Baby Fae had a potentially fatal heart problem, she was suffering from Hypoplastic left heart syndrome which is a fatal disease if not treated by surgery, (Time Magazine, 1984). The only way to save her was to replace her failing heart with a healthy seven month old baboon heart. The medical professionals that were working on Baby Fae were excited to be able to perform this Xenotransplantation on the infant. After the procedure Baby Fae was acting like any normal healthy infant would. But unfortunately, the replacement heart surgery wasn’t a true success story as the medical staff had hoped. Baby Fae died 20 days after her surgery because her tiny body rejected the baboons heart, which then went on to cause other fatal damage such as kidney...

    Read More

  • Ethical Ethics Of Xenotransplantation

    665 Words  | 2 Pages

    In America, there are currently 122,198 candidates on the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) waiting list (“OPTN”). Due to a lack of available organ donors, around 18 waiting list candidates will die every day (“OPTN”). This has prompted the development and investigation of xenotransplantation—the transplantation of animal tissue and organs to potential human candidates. Currently in its early phases of development and study, xenotransplantation is controversial for its high failure rate, with only a few cases successful. This is attributed to the human immune system rejecting those animal donated organs, thereby potentially causing immediate death to the human candidate. On the one hand, pre-clinical trials have broadened the understanding of the human immune system, as well as furthered xenotransplantation research. However, because xenotransplantation has achieved little success, opponents of the procedure argue that it is unethical to continue its practice. It is also important to note that trials often use baboons in place of humans, which presents several variables to be examined before further human trials can begin. Moreover, the potential acquisition of zoonotic infection is a serious risk that cannot be fully determined without the use of human subjects. Thus, not only will xenotransplantation require more extensive study, it will also require hundreds of animal lives, all in an effort to create nothing more than a last resort.

    Read More

  • Cloning - It’s Time for Organ Farms

    1444 Words  | 3 Pages

    Currently 70,000 Americans are on the organ waiting list and fewer than 20,000 of these people can hope to have their lives saved by human organ transplantation.1  As a result of this shortage, there has been a tremendous demand for research in alternative methods of organ transplantation.  Private companies are racing to develop these technologies with an estimated market of six billion dollars.2  Xenotransplantation, or cross-species organ transplantation, appears to be the most likely solution in the near future, and cloned pigs are the main candidates.  Pigs and humans have remarkable similarities in physiology, which along with cloning makes pigs strong possibilities for organ donors.  A controversial alternative method involves the use of genetically altered headless human beings as organ donors.  Although this method may not be developed for some years, scientists are already discussing the necessary technologies.  Whether the solution is the cloning of a pig or a human, organ farms may provide us with a solution to our ever-increasing need for donors.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Xenotransplantation

    1654 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many ethical and social implications arise with xenotransplantation. For example, if some countries allow xenotransplantation and others don’t, there may be a trend towards “xenotourists” – people who travel to get the surgery. They if these people were to contract a disease it could spread and even cause a pandemic. Their country of origin would feel the negative effects so making the decision not to allow this

    Read More

  • Human Genetic Engineering is Morally Justified

    810 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...r, human genetic engineering is not immoral; the failure to use such a technology is truly what is unjust. To negate the resolution is to turn a person away from a possible cure, from a chance to prolong life. I have shown that human genetic engineering can improve the health of the society by both curing disease and prolonging live. Both benefits are worthy goals of any just society. These possible benefits of genetic engineering, those of curing disease and prolonging life, outweigh any possible "side-effects" that may occur with the development of any new technology. But we must remember that we do not rush into any new technology; human genetic engineering will be done carefully as with any technology, so that we may maximize the benefits of such a great gift to society. For these reasons, I affirm the resolution, "Human genetic engineering is morally justified."

    Read More

  • Animal Breeding Ethics

    2373 Words  | 5 Pages

    Horse racing has become increasingly popular as demonstrated by the growing amount of money bet on events each year. The Kentucky Derby, horse racing’s most well known event, is an applicable example. While lasting just over two minutes, the main race generated $112.7 million in wagering, up 7.8% from the year prior. (Brisnet.com) Some critics, however, feel that the sport as a whole has become artificially supported through genetic enhancement used to achieve the high level of precision and strength necessary to excel. An anonymous opinion piece in the New York Times brings attention to the relationship between an industry that has grown exponentially in revenue and the pressure placed on those in position to capitalize on that growth. In light of this opportunity to make a substantial amount of money trends have been established that undermine the safety of both the jockey and the horse. Although through the horses inability to voice an opinion in its own partnership a unique situation is created. Unlike the horse, a jockey may refuse the trainer or mangers urging to partake in jeopardizing or otherwise illicit activities. The risk thus unwillingly imposed on the horse raises large ethical and moral concerns, especially when the motives behind the behavior are made clear. In specific circumstances the use of genetic enhancement may be extremely beneficial although within horse racing the implementation of such procedures are by and large not utilized for the benefit of the horse but for the increased profit derived through alteration. Genetic alteration of horses is ethically and morally unjust within the context of horse racing because the long term risks the horses are unwillingly exposed to garner more importance than the in...

    Read More

  • Cosmetic Testing with Animals is Cruel

    1300 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Cruelty of Cosmetic Testing on Animals Each year, thousands of animals are brutally tortured in laboratories, in the name of cosmetic research. A movement to ban animal testing for cosmetic purposes has been gaining popularity, with many companies hopping on the bandwagon against this research. New alternatives have been developed to eliminate the need to test on animals. This is only a small beginning of what is necessary to end these immoral acts. Animal testing in cosmetics is useless and cruel, and can be accomplished by other methods of research to end the suffering of animals.

    Read More

  • Animal Research and Testing, Is it Ethical?

    2169 Words  | 5 Pages

    “Transplanting animal organs into humans is feasible.” USA Today. November 1999: 54-55. Gehlsen, Gale M., Ganion, Larry R. and Robert Helfst.

    Read More

  • It Isn T Good To Make Animals Grow Human Organs

    322 Words  | 1 Pages

    In this debate my group of 3 people Ming Jake and I, we proved that it isn't good to make animals grow human organs. Our two arguments were ethics and price. Ethics it is not ok to use pigs as factories, and why should the some people get organs just because they're richer.

    Read More

  • Human-Animal Hybrid Experiments

    1767 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 2004 another experiment was created in Rochester Minnesota at the Mayo Clinic. The clinic was the first to create pigs that used human blood in place of their own. In 2005, two more hybrids are created the first being a mouse with human brain cells and the second is a feline-human protein hybrid. These hybrids are being created to fight and cure cancers and diseases including Parkinson and Alzheimer’s disease. 2007 and 2008, sheep ...

    Read More

  • Ethics and Scientific Research

    1422 Words  | 3 Pages

    "Xenotransplantation – Ethical Considerations Based on Human and Societal Perspectives." Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. March 31, 2004. http://www.actavetscand.com/content/45/S1/S65.

    Read More

More about Xenotransplantation And Animal Cruelty

Open Document