Word Property In Othello

835 Words2 Pages

Derrida argues that what we know as truth within words in our current society, is not, in fact, the actual truth of the words. Throughout time, we have de-centered language, and have begun giving it new meaning that multiply from there. We have left the true origin of words behind and have distorted them into words that, while powerful, do not represent what they should. One word that has become twisted is the word property. Originally it meant a thing or things belonging to someone; possessions collectively, a building or buildings and the land belonging to it or them, the right to the possession, use, or disposal of something; that is, ownership. It was a physical item, something that could not think for itself or have its own agency. Throughout history, however, the word has turned towards encompassing people, more specifically towards minorities. In Othello, we see females as property to their fathers, and then to their spouses. They are not supposed to have their own opinions, intellect, or agency. …show more content…

The use of thief indicates that Brabantio views Desdemona as property that has been taken from him. Earlier in the play we see Iago plant a firmer idea that women should be seen as property of their fathers. Iago exclaims “ Awake! What, ho, Brabantio! Thieves! Thieves! Thieves! Look to your house, your daughter and your bags! Thieves! Thieves!” (1.1.7) In Shakespeare’s time, during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, it was common practice that daughters were thought of as their father’s property. Iago knows this, and while he does not implant this idea for the first time in Brabantio, he does affirm it. As a piece of property to their fathers, daughters were at the father’s discretion to be married off, traded and bartered for, and to stay under their father’s control until they were given

Open Document