Women In Kant's Critique Of Judgment '

535 Words2 Pages

Plato through Socrates is trying to advocate for the advancement and equality of women. However, his notion of equality is different than the one people are making today. For Plato still thought of women as inferior, but he thought that women were inferior just to men of their own class and inferior to men in the society as a whole. This is important because today’s notion of equality calls for not only equality for men and women in the same social class, but also in society as a whole. Socrates then tells the group about the philosopher-kings. Socrates also tries to differentiate between actual philosophers and so called, “lovers of sights and sounds”. These lovers could be seen as aesthetes or people who claim to know what is beautiful. What …show more content…

More importantly, Plato sets up an interesting epistemological, metaphysical, and aesthetical idea revolving around this idea of Forms. Can a beautiful woman be completely beautiful? Or is she only somewhat beautiful with minor imperfections? Can we base our knowledge on something that is only partially true? How do we know what is true beauty? Can beauty be a pure or absolute truth? In there something outside of our own existence which dictates beauty? In Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Judgment, he tries to argue for beauty as a subjective feeling with some universal validity. According to Kant, the nature and existence of God are unknowable to us and so too are the idea of the Argument of Design (the Argument of Design is one where the patterns and perfection in nature suggests that there is an intelligent designer) and so therefore our judgements of beauty are based on subjective feelings with some universal validity. If beauty were an objective property held by nature, then how were these objects made to be beautiful? This can be related back to the idea of the beautiful woman. Our judgement of beauty is one made with feelings and there is universality to those feelings. Our judgement of beauty is universal because it is disinterested in us as an individual. That is to say that our own individual wants and

Open Document