Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Women in american fiction
How are women portrayed in american literature
Women puritan society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Imagine living in a society where one’s rights were restricted. The legal rights for Puritan women were very limited. Women were not able to accomplish many things that the women of America can today. They were not able to be the income producers of their homes. Women were mainly responsible for taking care of their homes, husbands, children, and farms. Women were considered to be weak and they were second to their husbands. During this time, the men were leaders and they made all the decisions. Anne Bradstreet overcame the strict requirements of the Puritan beliefs and was able to speak out about her life, which was displayed in many of her works; “The Author To Her Book,” “The Prologue,” and “An Epitaph On My Dear And Ever Honoured Mother”. …show more content…
In the first stanza, she clarifies that she will not be writing about war, captain, and kings and that those topics should be addressed by “poets and historians” (Belasco p.153). Bradstreet wants to her writing capabilities to be known, she can only write about common situations. She then display her humbleness, “ but simple I according to my skill” (Belasco p.153). Bradstreet states the tone of her writing in the fifth stanza, “I am obnoxious to each carping tongue..” (Belasco p.153). Anne Bradstreet’s use of language and literary techniques helps her to be able to express her feelings towards her writing. In the first stanza she writes, “For my mean Pen are too superior things or how they all, or each their dates have run.” she uses an irony (Belasco p.153). In this stanza, Bradstreet is displaying her simple creative thinking but in an ironic way comparing it to her inability of writing about certain historic topics. In line thirty-seven, “Let Greeks be Greeks, and women what they are” (Belasco p. 154), she uses alliteration and diction to create a calm effect to lessen the stress of her tone. Anne Bradstreet uses literary techniques to express her thoughts and feelings towards her writings and famous …show more content…
Dorothy was a beautiful poem dedicated to the mother of Anne Bradstreet in 1650. Anne Bradstreet shared the positive characteristics of her mother with her her readers. She opened her poem with a warm description of her mother, “A loving mother and obedient wife” (Belasco p.155). Anne Bradstreet uses diction to describe her mother in line five, “whom oft she fed and clothes with her store” (Belasco p.155). Bradstreet wrote about an ideal Puritan woman, a good religious wife and mother. Around this time, this is the characteristics Puritan women should have. She appeals to her reader’s emotion by describing her mother. When reading, most individuals would be able to relate to their own mother. Even though she was not able to speak out during this time, her style of writing portrays how her mother inspires
Anne Hutchinson's efforts, according to some viewpoints, may have been a failure, but they revealed in unmistakable manner the emotional starvation of Puritan womanhood. Women, saddened by their hardships, depressed by their religion, denied an open love for beauty...flocked with eagerness to hear this feminine radical...a very little listening seems to have convinced them that this woman understood the female heart far better than did John Cotton of any other male pastor of the settlements. (C. Holliday, pps. 45-46.)
The title character of Catharine Maria Sedgewick’s novel, Hope Leslie, defies the standards to which women of the era were to adhere. Sedgewick’s novel is set in New England during the 17th century after the Puritans had broken away from the Church of England. Hope Leslie lives in a repressive Puritan society in which women behave passively, submit to the males around them, and live by the Bible. They allow the men of their family to make decisions for them and rarely, if ever, convey an opinion that differs from the status quo. However, Hope Leslie does not conform to the expected behavior of women during that time, behavior that only further expressed the supposed superiority of males. Hope portrays behaviors and attitudes common in a woman today. Hope is capable of thinking for herself, is courageous, independent, and aggressive. Sir Philip Gardner describes Hope as having “a generous rashness, a thoughtless impetuosity, a fearlessness of the… dictators that surround her, and a noble contempt of fear” (211). In comparison to Esther Downing, Hope is the antithesis of what a young Puritan woman should be, and in turn, Hope gains a great deal of respect from the readers of the novel through her “unacceptable” behavior.
Literary historicism, in the context of this discussion, describes the interpretation of literary or historical texts with respect to the cultural and temporal conditions in which they were produced. This means that the text not only catalogues how individuals respond to their particular circumstances, but also chronicles the movements and inclinations of an age as expressed in the rhetorical devices of its literature. Evaluating the trial of Anne Hutchinson within such a theoretical framework means speculating on the genesis of her theological beliefs with recourse to prevailing theories of gender, class, and interpretation. Because texts are self-contained spheres of discourse, nuanced interpretations of them can be undertaken with greater assiduity than in the case of individuals whose private experiences remain largely concealed from the interpreter's knowledge. A historical analysis of Anne Hutchinson herself is hence, in the present discussion, secondary to the analysis of how she comes across in textual discourse as a palimpsest of seventeenth century gender controversy.
Bradstreet was a Puritan and was therefore raised with a simplistic view of the world. This, combined with the fact that she was a woman, carried over into her way of writing. Her writing style was not eloquent but plain, humble, and pleasant to read. Her poems dealt with topics such as faith, family, and adversity and were easy to understand. Bradstreet had great faith which she gained through the experiences she encountered in life.
Women have faced oppression in the literary community throughout history. Whether they are seen as hysterical or unreliable, women writers seem to be faulted no matter the topics of their literature. However, Anne Bradstreet and Margaret Fuller faced their critics head-on. Whether it was Bradstreet questioning her religion or Fuller discussing gender fluidity, these two women did not water down their opinions to please others. Through their writings, Bradstreet and Fuller made great strides for not just women writers, but all women.
The components of marriage, family and loss has played a big role in Anne Bradstreet’s writing of “Before the birth of One of Her Children”, “In Memory of Dear Grandchild Elizabeth Bradstreet”, and Edward Taylor’s “Upon Wedlock and the Death of Children.” In, these writings both authors Puritan culture and their faith plays a big role. In these poems one author starts questioning their God and the other to take honor in their God throughout their grieving process, while both showing different aspects of their everlasting union with their spouse, and the love for their children.
Anne Bradstreet, whom most critics consider America’s first “authentic poet”, was born and raised as a Puritan. Bradstreet married her husband Simon at the tender age of eighteen. She wrote her poems while rearing eight children and performing other domestic duties. In her poem “Upon The Burning Of Our House, July 10th, 1666”, Bradstreet tells of three valuable lessons she learned from the fire that destroyed her home.
Mary Rowlandson and Anne Bradstreet were both revolutionary female British writers whose work is widely credited with having great impact on literature. Mary Rowlandson was born about 1636 in England. Mary was the fifth child of a family of devout Puritans. Whereas, Anne Bradstreet was born in Northampton, England in about 1612 to Dorothy Yorke and Thomas Dudley. In this day and age, readers are starting to question the tone Anne Bradstreet's work. Associating it with less credibility then the work of Mary Rowlandson. Anne Bradstreet's poetry is viewed as a coded message whereas Mary Rowlandson's work is considered mostly as historical fact because of the distinctive tones used by both authors.
In the Salem, Massachusetts, the year of 1692 women were “puritans”. They dressed very modestly, kept their hair hidden, and were loyal to their husbands. The majority were stay at home wives. The young women would work for the older women and would get paid. Elizabeth Proctor, Abigail Williams, and Mary Warren each did one of those things. These women represent the archetypes of this story.
Anne Bradstreet’s poems were mainly wrote for herself and her religion, but also her family. Her poem “To my Dear and Loving Husband” and “Before the Birth of One of Her Children” show a perfect example of how much her family mean's to her. They are warm and compassionate poem that I feel were mainly wrote for the ones she adored most. Anne Bradstreet was born in the year 1612 in Northampton, England. She was well educated in England and graduated from Cambridge University at age 16. Shortly after, she emigrated to the New World with her family on the “Arbella.” In the New world her husband, Simon Bradstreet, became the governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Anne Bradstreet did end up have eight children which were included in her poems.
This poem is a firsthand account of how Anne Bradstreet was feeling when she experienced the loss of her granddaughter, Elizabeth. Although Bradstreet's attitude on Elizabeth's death seems to reflect her belief in God's plan, the diction suggests otherwise.
“Girls wear jeans and cut their hair short and wear shirts and boots because it is okay to be a boy; for a girl it is like promotion. But for a boy to look like a girl is degrading, according to you, because secretly you believe that being a girl is degrading” (McEwan 55-56). Throughout the history of literature women have been viewed as inferior to men, but as time has progressed the idealistic views of how women perceive themselves has changed. In earlier literature women took the role of being the “housewife” or the household caretaker for the family while the men provided for the family. Women were hardly mentioned in the workforce and always held a spot under their husband’s wing. Women were viewed as a calm and caring character in many stories, poems, and novels in the early time period of literature. During the early time period of literature, women who opposed the common role were often times put to shame or viewed as rebels. As literature progresses through the decades and centuries, very little, but noticeable change begins to appear in perspective to the common role of women. Women were more often seen as a main character in a story setting as the literary period advanced. Around the nineteenth century women were beginning to break away from the social norms of society. Society had created a subservient role for women, which did not allow women to stand up for what they believe in. As the role of women in literature evolves, so does their views on the workforce environment and their own independence. Throughout the history of the world, British, and American literature, women have evolved to become more independent, self-reliant, and have learned to emphasize their self-worth.
By reading Bradstreet’s work, a fair sense of what Mrs. Bradstreet was like can be grasped. She clearly stated her opinion of those who objected to her writing: “I am obnoxious to each carping tongue, / Who says my hand a needle better fits.” (Bradstreet,“ The Prologue”155). Bradstreet refused to give up her passion for writing even if it meant going against the opinions of anyone in her colony, including religious leaders. Although Bradstreet referred to herself as being obnoxious, her written works portray an entirely different Bradstreet. She seeks no reward or fame for her writing: “Give thyme or parsley wreath, I ask no bays” (155). Bradstreet seeks no reward for her writing because she doesn’t think her work is very good: “My foolish, broken, blemished Muse so sings” (154). She refers to her writing as her: “ill-formed offspring” (“The Author To Her Book”165). Even after her work is published she is ...
”The Prologue,” Bradstreet conveys knowledge of recognizing the kind of patriarchy she lives in, in the fifth and sixth stanza.
Throughout literature’s history, female authors have been hardly recognized for their groundbreaking and eye-opening accounts of what it means to be a woman of society. In most cases of early literature, women are portrayed as weak and unintelligent characters who rely solely on their male counterparts. Also during this time period, it would be shocking to have women character in some stories, especially since their purpose is only secondary to that of the male protagonist. But, in the late 17th to early 18th century, a crop of courageous women began publishing their works, beginning the literary feminist movement. Together, Aphra Behn, Charlotte Smith, Fanny Burney, and Mary Wollstonecraft challenge the status quo of what it means to be a