Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Free speech in american media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Free speech in american media
Wikileaks, a non-profit organization which implied much on freedom of press and freedom of speech started its activities in 2006, leaking sensitive information to other sources and shared online for public view and responses using internet as a base of operations and moved journalism to a new level. “As Daniel Ellsberg, and then Woodward and Bernstein, remade journalism into a transaction of reporters and sources, now it will be a hacker’s function” (Wolff, 2010). This phenomenon is shifting the face of journalism towards online journalism which made it the new fourth estate, and Julian Assange has laid the first stone in the form of Wikileaks. He always speaks "to bring important news and information to the public... the original source material alongside our news stories so readers and historians alike can see evidence of the truth." (Assange, 2006)
Taking of free speech John Adams spoke of free speech as no such thing ever existed and no such thing now exists but hopes for a better future where everyone can experience free speech.
The media now is changed as most of them have become commercial and no longer has an antagonistic relationship with secrecy, concentration of power and corruption as the corporations which pay for politicians now own the Journalists and the media agencies.
Coming to the Wikileaks most of the mainstream journalists hate it because it not only gave discrete information on governments but also exposed the media and how they are acting as a smokescreen generating machine for government. (Ben, 2010), in comparison with the present journalism with that of 30 year old journalism Ben Tripp, exclaims if there would have been such a leak about governments and corporations a properly motivated Fourth estate wou...
... middle of paper ...
...to face the consequences for what to come for a better tomorrow, but how many of us will be ready to such a sacrifice.
In conclusion the freedom of speech and freedom of press is completely attained when the journalism is impartial towards the politicians and corporates. The stand that wikileaks took to educate people of what governments are doing in a disguise to protect themselves disregarding the interests of people who elect them. The essay also portrays the use of advanced technology which will enable its user to view and share information creating the social awareness of what the government is hiding from its people which can be discussed and debated on the whole and a justified outcome can be attained. Thus we can exclaim that internet which is humongous source of all kinds of information can be the new fourth estate where every aspect has a global approach.
Julian Assange’s website, WikiLeaks made global headlines in the last few years. Assange started out by leaking documents he had acquired over the internet about banks in various European countries. Chelsea Manning, Army Private at the time stationed in Iraq joined up with Assange and delivered to him thousands of classified documents that Manning, a military intelligence analyst had access to. Manning was in contact with a former hacker named Adrian Lamo who he asked advice of, advice whether or not he should leak the documents. Manning going against Lamo’s advice of not leaking the documents caused Manning to be arrested after Lamo turned him in for the leak. This was a major blow for Wikileaks who had just lost their major source of confidential documents from the United States government. Since 9/11, the United States Government has realized that information needs to be shared among intelligence agencies in order to thwart terrorist attacks. A side effect however is that information is no longer on a need-to-know basis which made it possible for Manning to leak it all out. After receiving this confidential information, Assange began to make this information available to media outlets. Assange’s actions were morally and ethically incorrect. He should not have leaked so many classified documents especially without redacting the names of informants whose lives could have been in danger. These documents leaked by Manning to Assange were meant strictly for the eyes and ears of those who were privileged to the information, not for the front page of the New York Times. WikiLeaks and Julian Assange threatened global security as they willingly and knowingly put lives of thousands at risk by allowing the bad guys an opportunity to a...
Glenn Greenwald, a talented and widely read columnist on civil liberties for the Guardian newspaper, failed in his attempt to alarm his readers to the flagrant and widespread violations of American privacy. Although his article was full of facts, documentation, and quotes from top rank officials, the article did not convey any sense of wrong doing or outrage. Rather it was dull, lacked passion and a sense of persuasion. In fact, the only attention grabbing part in the whole article is the title.
Edward Snowden was an American computer specialist that worked for the CIA and as a contractor for the NSA. He disclosed classified files over several media sources, that were evidence that the NSA was collecting data from the phone calls and internet activities of most Americans. Snowden thought that by revealing these secret government activities that Americans would realized that their privacy is being invaded and that they need to do something about it.
Recently in global news, the name Edward Snowden has became quite popular as he snatched millions of people’s attention along with breaking news headlines. Snowden released numerous documents via internet that were private to the NSA; these leaks revealed the dirty work the NSA and government have ...
Keck, Zachary. "Yes, Edward Snowden Is a Traitor." The Diplomat. N.p., 21 Dec. 2013. Web. 21 Feb. 2014
In May of 2013, Edward Snowden met with journalist Glenn Greenwald and controversial documentary film director Laura Poitras to release numerous national security- related documents to them. Snowden, who at the time was a computer professional with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and a former contractor with the National Security Agency
Harris, Paul. “WikiLeaks has caused little lasting damage, says US state department”. The Guardian. 1 January 2011. n. pag. Web. 27 February 2014.
Board, The Editorial. “Edward Snowden, Whistle-Blower.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 1 Jan. 2014. Web. 18 May. 2014
Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency (N.S.A) subcontractor turned whistle-blower is nothing short of a hero. His controversial decision to release information detailing the highly illegal ‘data mining’ practices of the N.S.A have caused shockwaves throughout the world and have raised important questions concerning how much the government actually monitors its people without their consent or knowledge. Comparable to Mark Felt in the Watergate scandals, Daniel Ellsberg with the Pentagon Papers, Edward Snowden joins the rank of infamous whistleblowers who gave up their jobs, livelihood, and forever will live under scrutiny of the public all in the service to the American people. Edward Snowden released information detailing the extent of the N.S.A breaches of American privacy and in doing so, became ostracized by the media and barred from freely reentering America, his home country.
Loss of authority and credibility normally connected to media that are well established have journalistic standards, ethic and accountability can be seen as a problem
These are the words of Jesselyn Radack, a whistleblower who promoted transparency by exposing the truth to Americans. From the birth of this country, Americans have valued transparency in the government. Still, there are instances where the government is allowed to keep secrets from the American people. There has been ongoing debate on whether the American Federal government should be allowed to keep secrets from the American people. Whistleblowers are important is this debate because of their fail-safe method of creating transparency. There are three central reasons to prevent government secrecy. First, Secrecy goes against our American values. Second, Americans should have a transparent government. Third, Secrecy can harm the government and American people. To summarize, Governmental secrecy must be stopped because it is unconstitutional and undemocratic, transparency is a necessary check of the government, and governmental secrecy can lead to corruption.
Journalist or Terrorist Julian Assange, an Australian editor, activist, journalist and publisher, launched the WikiLeaks website in the year 2006. From that moment, the site spiraled rapidly into the limelight all over the world. It then came to be known as the most powerful whistle-blowing and also the most scandalous “media” in the online world. WikiLeaks profans and violates the right of privacy, right of accountability and confidentiality among Information and data sharing also it has a negative impact on governments, private sectors or businesses and also individuals, there is also a big question of accountability. Right of privacy, right of accountability and confidentiality are some of the rights that you acquire being a citizen of the country and when these rights are violated it is an offence.
The old proverb “the Pen is mightier than the sword” (Edward Bulwer-Lytton, Richelieu; Or the Conspiracy) still holds significance in protecting of public rights. Words such as freedom, and liberty engendered the idea for democracy. Such words formed into sentences and paragraphs enlightened the public to take action against tyranny and corruption. Freedom of the press is what ensured the general masses of their public rights. The exemplary case in which the freedom of the press played a role was the endeavors of Woodward and Bernstein to unravel the corrupted politics behind the Watergate Scandal. The movie All the President’s Men depicts the proceedings of the Watergate scandal, the scheme to attack the crux of democracy: “ the open election”. Also how the two journalists of the Washington Post progressed to unveil the relationship between the Watergate Burglary and the White House. On one hand, the movie represents the role of the media in its obligation to convey the truth to the masses. On the other hand, the movie reflects political corruption and conspiracy. The accomplishment of Woodward and Bernstein presents the importance of the interaction between the media, the government, and the general masses of society. The role of the media is not only to intervene between the State and the public, but also to take account of public ideas and to apply those ideas to new policies. Also, the media acts as a safeguard to prevent the corruption of the State. Thus, the Watergate scandal signifies the significance of the media as an intermediary between the government and the public mass.
You may have heard of the website Wikileaks. Wikileaks is/was an online organization, dedicated to exposing corrupt governments and large corporations. Since its upbringing in October of 2006 by Julian Assange, it has published over one million articles and is credited as one of the largest ‘leak’ sources in modern society. These articles, mainly published by anonymous civilians, vary in degree from patent battles to millions of confidential government documents (Wikileaks & Wikileaks Wikipedia).
The current role of mass media in politics has definitely played a significant role in how view and react to certain events and issues of the nation. Newspapers, magazines, television and radio are some of the ways information is passed onto many of the citizens. The World Wide Web is also an information superhighway, but not all of the sources on the Internet are credible. Therefore, I will only focus on the main three types of media: written, viewed, and audible, and how they affect whether or not democracy is being upheld in the land of the free. The media includes several different outlets through which people can receive information on politics, such as radio, television, advertising and mailings. When campaigning, politicians spend large quantities of money on media to reach voters, concentrating on voters who are undecided. Politicians may use television commercials, advertisements or mailings to point out potentially negative qualities in their opponents while extolling their own virtues. The media can also influence politics by deciding what news the public needs to hear. Often, there are more potential news stories available to the media than time or space to devote to them, so the media chooses the stories that are the most important and the most sensational for the public to hear. This choice can often be shaped,