Wide Sargasso Sea Essay

1835 Words4 Pages

Jean Rhys’ novella Wide Sargasso Sea, which was intended to be a prequel to Jane Eyre, follows the story of Antoinette Cosway. Set in a post-colonial Caribbean and later England, this work addresses many of the issues associated with colonialism. One such issue is the oppressive patriarchal structure of colonial societies. This novella reflects on the experiences of women in these patriarchal societies of the era, working to show how this system oppresses women. This aspect of Rhys’ story can be analyzed much deeper when applying Stephen Greenblatt’s essay
Culture. Applying Greenblatt’s conception of culture as a system of mobility and constraints one can better understand the relationship between Wide Sargasso Sea as a literary work …show more content…

In summarizing the relationship between constraint and mobility Greenblatt says that mobility is an expression of exchange, that
“a culture is a particular network of negotiations for the exchange of material goods, ideas, and
. . . people” (Greenblatt 229). He goes on saying that “the two concerns are linked, for a culture’s narratives . . . are crucial indices of the prevailing codes governing human mobility and constraint” (Greenblatt 229,230). Greenblatt holds that writers master these codes, that they are
“specialists of exchange” (Greenblatt 230). It is in this way that literature performs a kind of cultural work, that it has sense of power in relation to cultural constraints and mobility.
Literature enacts cultural constraint and mobility through its rhetorical procedures of praise and
Blame (Greenblatt 226). Through her work Wide Sargasso Sea Rhys explicitly reflects on the system of constraint and mobility in early nineteenth century colonial culture. Her work serves to “shape, articulate, and reproduce” the ratio of constraint and mobility of the culture of her time, and ultimately is an attempt to alter these boundaries (Greenblatt 229). While it would be easy to read this novel as …show more content…

One of the levels of oppression that this symbol encompasses is that associated with gender, for it is Antoinette’s marriage to this white
Englishman that ultimately leads to her ruin. Having not married for love, but because her unnamed husband (who is intended to be
Bertha Mason’s husband Rochester in Jane Eyre) is offered a large sum of money by Mr.
Mason’s son to propose to Antoinette. The two hardly know each other, and their marriage is loveless and clearly incompatible. Rochester is a cold man who offers nothing of himself to
Antoinette. Sure he lusts after her sexually, but he did not love Antoinette. As he clearly says,
“I did not love her. I was thirsty for her, but that is not love . . . she was a stranger to me” (Rhys
78). Rochester felt no love when looking into Antoinette’s “sad, dark alien eyes”; he felt hate
(Ryhs 56). When he would look at her he saw “the hatred in her eyes” and felt his “own hatred spring up to meet it” (Rhys 139). Rhys certainly paints the picture of a very unhappy marriage. In addition to Rochester’s disregard for Antoinette’s happiness, readers see very clearly how in marrying Antoinette he comes to control her life completely. There are several

Open Document