Why the South Fought the War

339 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Southern version of cause of civil war

D. W. Griffith's film "Birth of a Nation" shows that the South fought the war not only to protect slavery, but also to preserve a whole culture, a way of life. Their wealth and identity belonged to the land they lived on. Southerners fought to protect sovereignty, pride, identity, and their decision to secede which was under attack by a despot - President Lincoln. Few of the southerners could give up their culture without a fight. "Birth of a Nation" tells the story of the Civil. One of its main missions is to portray the true southern way of life. The south was an aristocratic society. Everybody was happy and content with their everyday lives. Even slaves shown in the movie looked happy and were even dancing. They didn't look as they were going through big hardships and were oppressed by their masters. The south fought for preserving a culture that believed in the superiority of the white race, which meant that even those whites who didn't own slaves might still defend a slave culture. The people were made to feel better than blacks. Slavery was the heart of the Southern culture. Without slavery the structure of society would collapse. The South fought the war not only to protect their economic interests, but to preserve a culture and a way of life. When Abraham Lincoln became a threat to slavery, they felt that the whole way of life is being eliminated. Poet Henry Timrod, a Southerner, who is sometimes called "the poet of the Lost Cause," writes about a threat to Southern culture in his poem "Carolina." The despot treads thy sacred sands, Thy pines give shelter to his bands, Thy sons stand by with idle hands, Carolina! He breathes at ease thy airs of balm, He scorns the lances of thy palm; Oh! who shall break thy craven calm, Carolina! Thy ancient fame is growing dim, A spot is on thy garment's rim; Give to the winds thy battle hymn, Carolina!... The author refers to the President Lincoln as a "despot," a tyrant who will "break thy craven calm" and change the life in the South.

Show More
Related

  • A Comparison of Lincoln and Douglas on the Issue of the House Divided

    1005 Words  | 3 Pages

    Lincoln would began by warning that the subject of slavery will not go away until there is a crisis that either abolishes slavery...

    Read More

  • Summary: Why The North Won The Civil War

    999 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Civil War, beginning in 1861 and ending in 1865, was a notorious event in American history for many influential reasons. Among them was the war 's conclusive role in determining a united or divided American nation, its efforts to successfully abolish the slavery institution and bring victory to the northern states. This Civil War was first inspired by the unsettling differences that divided the northern and southern states over the power that resided in the hands of the national government to constrain slavery from taking place within the territories. There was only one victor in the Civil War. Due to the lack of resources, plethora of weaknesses, and disorganized leadership the Southern States possessed in comparison to the Northern States,

    Read More

  • Why the North Won the American Civil War

    1271 Words  | 3 Pages

    Union officer William Tecumseh Sherman observed to a Southern friend that, "In all history, no nation of mere agriculturists ever made successful war against a nation of mechanics. . . .You are bound to fail." While Sherman's statement proved to be correct, its flaw is in its assumption of a decided victory for the North and failure to account for the long years of difficult fighting it took the Union to secure victory. Unquestionably, the war was won and lost on the battlefield, but there were many factors that swayed the war effort in favor of the North and impeded the South's ability to stage a successful campaign.

    Read More

  • Lincoln Lyceum Address Thesis

    423 Words  | 1 Pages

    Abraham Lincoln reported how a cruel and oppressive ruler could take over the American political system from within. He said, “What! Think you these places would satisfy an Alexander, a Caesar,

    Read More

  • Why the Confederacy Lost the War

    716 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many historians have tried to offer their ideology on the outcome of the Civil War. McPherson in his “American Victory, American Defeat” writes about what other historians have decreed their answers to why the Confederacy lost. He tells us the reasons that could not be the explanation for the loss, and explains the internal reasons but leaves the true cause of the loss untold. Freehling explains the defeat by discussing what could have been and then gives reasons to negate some of the cases that he states for the outcome of the Confederacy. Both McPherson and Freehling both agreed that there were other factors besides battles that needed to be looked at.

    Read More

  • Why The North Won The Civil War Analysis

    1274 Words  | 3 Pages

    Henry Steele Commager’s essay “The Defeat of the Confederacy: An Overview” is more summary than argument. Commager is more concerned with highlighting the complex causality of the war’s end rather than attempting to give a definitive answer. Commager briefly muses over both the South’s strengths

    Read More

  • The Battle of Gettysburg as the Turning Point of the Civil War

    1599 Words  | 4 Pages

    The South was fighting against a government that they thought was treating them unfairly. They believed the Federal Government was overtaxing them, with tariffs and property taxes making their lifestyles even more expensive than they already had been. The North was fighting the Civil War for two reasons, first to keep the Nation unified, and second to abolish slavery. Abraham Lincoln, the commander and chief of the Union or Northern forces, along with many other Northerners, believed that slavery was not only completely wrong, but it was a great humiliation to America. Once we can see that with these differences a conflict would surely occur, but not many had predicted that a full-blown war would breakout.

    Read More

  • Why The North Won the Civil War

    1524 Words  | 4 Pages

    "If wars are won by riches, there can be no question why the North eventually prevailed." The North was better equipped than the South, with the resources necessary to be successful in a long term war like the Civil War was, which was fought from 1861 – 1865. Prior, and during the Civil war, the North's economy was always stronger than the South's, boasting of resources that the Confederacy had no means of attaining. Compared to the South, The North had more factories available for production of war supplies and larger amounts of land for growing crops. Its population was several times of the South's, which was a potential source for military enlistees. Although the South had better naval leadership and commanders, such as Robert E. Lee and "Stonewall" Jackson, they lacked the number of factories and industries to produce needed war materials. Therefore, the North won the American Civil War due to the strength of their industrialized economy, rather than their commanders and strategies.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Radical And The Republican

    1023 Words  | 3 Pages

    . .’, concludes James Oakes’ book with the aftermath of the Civil War and Lincoln’s assassination. Oakes discussed the respect Douglass gathered for Lincoln over the years and the affect his assassination had on both himself and America as a whole. Oakes even brushed over Douglass’ relationship with Andrew Johnson, the president succeeding Lincoln. Analyzing his experience with the new president, it was safe to say that Andrew Johnson had no consideration as to what Douglass and Lincoln previously fought for. Johnson did not have the same political skills as Lincoln did, and he did not retain the same view for America that Lincoln did. It was obvious that Douglass held Lincoln at a higher standard than Andrew Johnson, stating that he was a “progressive man, a humane man, an honorable man, and at heart an anti-slavery man” (p. 269). Oakes even gave his own stance on Andrew Jackson, “It was a legacy that Andrew Johnson could ever match. When all of Lincoln’s attributes were taken into consideration - his ascent from the obscurity to greatness, his congenial temperament, his moral courage - it was easy for Douglass to imagine how much better things would be ‘had Mr. Lincoln been living today’.” (p. 262). It is hard to imagine the pre-war Douglass to have said something like that as opposed to an older, much more reserved Douglass. With the abolishment of slavery, so came much discrimination. Without

    Read More

  • Lincoln Inaugural Address Analysis

    1028 Words  | 3 Pages

    Reading Lincoln’s first Inaugural Address, one wouldn’t think he would be the president to end slavery.Speaking on outlawing slavery, he says,“I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.” At the time, Lincoln wasn’t worried about slavery,

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On The Confederate Flag

    730 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Civil War was a battle between the northern states and the southern states. The southern states wanted to secede

    Read More

  • Analysis of the Emancipation Proclamation Speech

    1324 Words  | 3 Pages

    Johnson, Michael, and Allen C. Guelzo. “Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation: The End of Slavery in America.” Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. Michigan Publishing, n.d. Web. 27 Feb. 2014.

    Read More

  • Dixie Flag Research Paper

    1099 Words  | 3 Pages

    The confederate army, commanded by Robert E. Lee, represented the south. While Ulysses S. Grant commanded the Union in the the north. The war was fought in thousands of locations from southern New Mexico to the Florida coast. Around 3.5 million soldiers served and approximately 620,000 soldiers lost their lives. According to “The Confederate States of America” published on March 18th, 2013, “the war was fought due to the fear that they would discredit democracy and create a fatal precedent that would fragment the country and no longer would there be a United States.” This means that the confederate states were afraid that the union causing the north to abolish democracy causing the United States of America to split up causing states to become their own country. The confederate states of America consisted of 11 southern states. The 7 Deep South states, successful in the succession, included (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas). All 11 states however attempted and fought in order to succeed from the union due to the fear of fragmenting the United States of America and abolishment of slavery which would corrupt the economy due to president Abraham Lincoln's election. The south saw the confederate flag as a way to freedom. The civil war was their opportunity to rebel and become free of policies they did not agree with. Having the rebel

    Read More

  • Differences Between the North and South that Led to the Civil War

    1460 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Southern and Northern states varied on many issues, which eventually led them to the Civil War. There were deep economic, social, and political differences between the North and the South. These differences stemmed from the interpretation of the United States Constitution on both sides. In the end, all of these disagreements about the rights of states led to the Civil War. There were reasons other than slavery for the South?s secession. The manifestations of division in America were many: utopian communities, conflicts over public space, backlash against immigrants, urban riots, black protest, and Indian resistance (Norton 234). America was a divided land in need reform with the South in the most need. The South relied heavily on agriculture, as opposed to the North, which was highly populated and an industrialized society. The South grew cotton, which was its main cash crop and many Southerners knew that heavy reliance on slave labor would hurt the South eventually, but their warnings were not heeded. The South was based on a totalitarian system.

    Read More

  • The Secession Crisis

    903 Words  | 2 Pages

    Contrary to what today’s society believes about Lincoln, he was not a popular man with the South at this time. The South wanted to expand towards the West, but Lincoln created a geographical containment rule keeping slavery in the states it currently resided in. Despite his trying to rationalize with the South, Lincoln actually believed something different ”Lincoln claimed that he, like the Founding Fathers, saw slavery in the Old South as a regrettable reality whose expansion could and should be arrested, thereby putting it on the long and gradual road ”ultimate extinction” (216). He believed it to be “evil” thus “implying that free southerners were evil for defending it”(275). Lincoln wanted to wipe out slavery for good, and the South could sense his secret motives.

    Read More

More about Why the South Fought the War

Open Document