Why Monopolies Were Bad

1088 Words3 Pages

Laissez-faire Laissez-faire plays a part in shaping America’s modern economy. Laissez-faire is the belief that economies and business function best when there is no interference by the government. It is the belief that each individual’s self interest to do better, stronger competition from others and low taxes will lead to the strongest economy and therefore, everyone will benefit as result. However, this belief negatively impacts the modern economy of America. Some problems of laissez-faire shown in America’s economy is large gaps in distribution of wealth, poor treatment of workers and lack of safety in the workplace. During the presidencies of Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, the two of them started changing to support more government involvement and a less laissez-faire …show more content…

Monopolies are bad. Monopoly is the exclusive possession or control of the supply or trade in a community or service. As it is the only provider of a good or service, it gets a tremendous competitive advantage over any other company that tries to provide a similar product or service. Monopolies restrict free trade, preventing the market from setting prices, it results in four adverse effects that shows that it is bad for the economy. The reason why monopoly are bad goes even beyond these four economic effects. First, there are two reasons monopoly are bad for the economy. The first reason they are bad for the economy is that consumers gets no choice of what product they should buy for the best value. Since monopolies are lone providers, they can set any prices they choose. They can do this regardless of demand as the consumers have not choice. Another reason monopolies are bad for the economy is that not only can monopolies raise prices, but they also can supply inferior products. This can happen in some urban neighborhood, where grocery stores know poor residents have few alternatives. This shows two reasons why monopoly are bad for the

Open Document