Why Is Julius Caesar Bad

In The book Julius Caesar the people of Rome first describe him as a great person and a great leader but even though they told him of a great person I felt like if they didn’t kill him when they did he would be a big headed person that thinks he can do whatever he wants. The people of Rome that wanted him as king would soon regret that they chose him they would soon realize that the great person that they thought him to be was just a cover up. He would take all their money and use it for his own personal good and not use it to repair Rome. I think that brutus did the right thing to have a group and kill him that way he couldn’t cause chaos on that city and cause mass distraction. I feel like I was a good thing that they killed him when they did because if they didn’t he would be a tyrant and would have taken over Rome

Brutus shows regret over killing his friend but tells him to Rest In Peace but it was the right thing to do in order to keep the town safe. In Caesar’s will he gives all the money to the people of Rome, but that is after he dies but why didn’t he use some money he had to build parks and do whatever he could to help the people of Rome in their daily lives, he could have had people build houses for the poor that didn’t have homes or food to eat, but instead of doing that he kept all the money to himself. If he became king he would have been selfish and not helped anyone at all he would have been considered one of the most self centered person that ever ruled Rome, the people of Rome would be in bad shape physically and mentally if he was their ruler, they would wish that they didn’t give him the crown in the beginning. Brutus is blameless because he killed a person that was potentially poisonous to the people, Brutus did the town a huge favor. Caesar broke two laws; he went into Rubicon with his