Athens is better than Sparta because Athens has a better trading system. Athens economy was based on trade. It was near the sea, and it had a good harbor. They traded with other city-states and some foreign lands to get the goods and recourses that they needed. Athens bought and sold goods at a huge marketplace called the agora. They also bought and sold slaves at the agora. They traded: honey, olive oil, silver, and painted pottery. In return, they received items such as grain and wood. Athens made its own coin system to make trading easier. Coins were made out of gold, silver, and
The governments of these two city-states were not alike in many ways. “It is true that our government is called a democracy, because its administration is in the hands, not of the few, but of the many,” (Document 3). Athens’ government was what we would consider today a direct democracy. This means that their government was run by the people, or in other words “the many”, rather than a couple government officials, or “the few”. Although Athens was running their city as a government by the people, Sparta had a different form of government. “it is made up of oligarchy, monarchy, and democracy,
Rome had the better system of living than Athens because many people could be citizens and had little restrictions to be one, government was a republic and was usually fair, lastly territory token over was treated like their own.
Ancient Greece today is most known for the culture: the gods, the dramas, how people lived. What most people do not realize is that there were hundreds, maybe even thousands, of different civilizations spread throughout Greece that all had different forms of government. The three main ones were Athens, Sparta, and Miletus. Each was very different from the other. The most powerful out of all three was Sparta: a military based society. The Spartan government had a strong foundation that was all torn down by one bad leader.
I think, Sparta would be the best place to live in to fill my needs, if I lived in Ancient Greece. The three reasons that I think this is I could be a leader of an army, I am wealthy so I would have a fair amount of power over the city, and I would rather live in a country that fairly treats women and lets women do what men can do. I think all these reasons are important to support why I would rather live in Sparta if I was part of Ancient Greece.
The second reason is Athens should be admired for their democratic system. The political system of Athenians was a democracy. Democracy came from the Greek word “Demo” which means the people and” Kratos” means to rule. Athenian democracy developed in the Greek around 550 B.C .It was known ancient democracy. Athenians democracy was a unique and intriguing experiment so, other cities also followed this model. All the Athenians were equal and there was no different between classes and their status. Laws were equal for all of them. It did not classified rich, poor, educated, uneducated, and their status.
These states were either known for their political, military, or economical strength. These states were Athens, Sparta, Corinth, Thebes, and Argos. All of these states were established on the eastern side of Greece, with Thebes and Athens being the central areas. Athens and Sparta were the two most well known states due to their roles in the fifth century B.C. so those are the two I will go into some detail about. Sparta was different from other Greek states because of its size, recourses, and historical development. Laconia, which was controlled by Sparta, was much larger than an ordinary Greek state, and contained some of the most fertile land in Greece. For the government Sparta citizens that could perform military services created what was known as an assembly, there was also a council of elders made up of senior representatives that were from twenty-eight noble clans, and Sparta had an unusual two royal families, and two different kings. Private ownership of land was taken away and all the land was state controlled and was evenly distributed. Sparta soon became strictly militarized and every man became a soldier starting at the young age of seven. This made Sparta’s army indestructible but the political, economical, and cultural evolution ended for Sparta due to the military reforms. Athens on the other hand was not as big of a state as Sparta, and they were a sea power state instead of focus on land military. Also Athens went from a Monarchy to being controlled by archons, which were chosen actually by the aristocrats. Disagreements and many other factors between the states lead to the Peloponnesian war, which began in 431 B.C. no one, won the war but it seemed Athens suffered the biggest loss. Greek civilization hit its full maturity between 500 and 362 B.C. sculpture, architecture, and painting began to flourish along with
Athens and Sparta were all very big, successful city-states in the ancient world that conquered many lands and won many battles. Ancient Athens and Ancient Sparta seem similar; they have very different functioning societies. Athens was known for its impressive art and culture while Sparta was a very war-like city-state and their society was completely based on having a great military. The thing they had in common was that social status and the jobs that each rank of society had was very important. The social status was crucial to Sparta and Athens because, without it, both Greek city-states would not be able to function.
This article is credible and reliable; it offers two sets of information for the reader. It is also suitable for any age group. This site is helpful for those wanting to compare Athens and Sparta or simply read about one or the other.
The two city-states had different governments from each other. Sparta had an oligarchy government, where two kings are in command of armies. They also had a council that acted like judges and proposed laws. Athens had the world’s first
During the times of Ancient Greece, two major forms of government existed, democracy and oligarchy. The city-states of Athens and Sparta are the best representatives of democracy and oligarchy, respectively. The focus of the times was directed towards military capabilities, while the Athenians were more interested in comfort and culture. It was the oligarchy in Sparta that put a war-like attitude as its first priority and best met the needs of Ancient Greece. These factors empowered Sparta and led to the development of an authoritative and potent state. Other contrasting issues included women’s rights, social classes, and value of human life.
Sparta and Athens - Explain and Contrast Both Sparta and Athens were Greek city-states. Sparta was a strict military ruled city-state where the people established themselves as a military power early. However Athens was more of a political city-state that was more involved with their economical stature than their military forces. Still changes from the Persian wars would change the powers of the city-state and somewhat unite them.
Sparta and Athens were two of the best-known and most powerful city-states in ancient Greece. Sparta was known for its strong military and seemingly insensitive values, while Athens was famous for its democratic government and advanced learning. Sparta valued power and military strength, while Athens was home of the more scholarly, philosophic intellectuals. Though it may seem like Athens was the more advanced of the two, Sparta was ahead in one important aspect: its treatment of women. Spartan women had many rights. They were respected and treated very well. Athenian women, on the other hand, were barely better than slaves. They had little to no rights and received minimum respect, if any. Spartan women led much better lives than their Athenian
Athens and Sparta were both city-states in Classical Greece. While Athens embraced democracy, Sparta was a dictatorial fierce warrior state. Sparta was a militaristic community, Athens was a freethinking, and commerce minded city-state. Modern societies have modeled their government organizational structure and military discipline practices from lessons learned of these ancient city-states. There is much is to be praised regarding Classical Greece for their courage, their progressive thinking and the birth of democracy. However, I think it is important to remember that in both cases, Athens and Sparta were able to sustain their lifestyle on the backs of countless slaves, non-citizens and women and that there is a darker and less romantic side to the past.
Athens was a much more superior polis compared to Sparta because the Athenians invented new ideas and creations that supported the people, such as democracy, the Athenians led the Delian League, and Sparta created the Peloponnesian League after the Athenians created their alliance, and the Athenians changed the ways of their government many times to suit the people, and the Spartans did not.
Greece is a country united by its name, but divided by its ways. Although Sparta and Athens were both Greek cities, their societies were different. Sparta was focused on having a perfect military, whereas Athenian daily life revolved learning and knowledge. When Spartan boys were being trained for an army, Athenian boys were being trained for life. Both of these societies revolved around different government, education from when kids to teenagers, the responsibilities each individual had to keep their spot, and how women played a role throughout each city state.