Why Iran Should Get The Bomb Analysis

287 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Nuclear proliferation in the middle east essay

I picked the article called “Why Iran should Get the Bomb” by the author Kenneth N. Waltz. I read this article for one of my Political Science class that I took from sophomore year and I thought this is a good argumentative article because it has a clear thesis statement in introduction. In addition, Waltz has pointed out his argument with factual and logical evidential to support his opinions. The brief summary of this article is during the time the article was written, the US was tightening its economic sanctions and the EU also announced that it would begin an embargo on Iranian oil, in response to Iran’s nuclear activities. The author, Waltz’s argument was letting Iran have the bomb would be the best possible result as it would restore

Show More
Related

  • Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq

    646 Words  | 2 Pages

    In discussion of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, one controversial issue has the dropping of the atomic bombs being justified. On the other hand others believe that there were other ways of getting Japan to surrender and it was not justified, the only way we could get Japan to surrender was to invade them. Our strategy was to island hop until we got to Japan. Many more lives were at steak when doing that. Not only would just Americans would die, but a lot of the Japanese would have died as well, and the death toll would have much greater. 199,000 deaths came after the dropping of the atomic bombs. However, many American lives were saved, what the Japanese did to Pearl Harbor, and the treatment of our American soldiers while

    Read More

  • Pat Frank’s Alas Babylon

    837 Words  | 2 Pages

    Symonds, Peter. "World Socialist Web Site ." US think tank report weighs up "grim future' of nuclear war (2013).

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb Dbq

    1981 Words  | 4 Pages

    The United States of America’s use of the atomic bomb on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has spurred much debate concerning the necessity, effectiveness, and morality of the decision since August 1945. After assessing a range of arguments about the importance of the atomic bomb in the termination of the Second World War, it can be concluded that the use of the atomic bomb served as the predominant factor in the end of the Second World War, as its use lowered the morale, industrial resources, and military strength of Japan. The Allied decision to use the atomic bomb not only caused irreparable physical damage on two major Japanese cities, but its use also minimized the Japanese will to continue fighting. These two factors along

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb On Japan

    1456 Words  | 3 Pages

    Perhaps one of the most controversial topics that has ever existed is whether the U.S. should have dropped the atomic bomb on Japan. To some people, this is a matter of morals, while to others, it is a matter of politics. Some argue that it was better because it reduced the number of casualties. There are two views on the atomic bomb dropping: one side says it was the right thing to do, while the other side says it was the wrong thing to do. It seems as if only the American people believe that it was the right thing to do.

    Read More

  • Why the Atomic Bomb Was the Wrong Choice

    1354 Words  | 3 Pages

    This essay will explain through logic reasoning and give detailed reasons as to why the United States did not make the right choice. One of the most argued topics today, the end of World War II and the dropping of the atomic bombs, still rings in the American ear. Recent studies by historians have argued that the United States really did not make the right choice when they chose to drop the atomic bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Also with the release of classified documents, we can see that the United States could have made the choice to use other alternatives besides the use of the atomic weapon.... ... middle of paper ...

    Read More

  • Was The Atomic Bomb Justified

    805 Words  | 2 Pages

    While on the other hand, another thesis claims that the act of dropping the atomic bomb was complexly justifiable and not a war crime. Both sides had their weakness, however, they both had strong logical points. The first thesis strongest point was that without a doubt the use of the atomic bomb was a war crime because it killed so many and those whom it did not kill are left suffering. Thus, this argument contributes to present day fears of nuclear wars. In contrast, the second thesis is that even though the use of the atomic bomb may seem like a war crime.

    Read More

  • Harry Truman: The Atomic Bomb

    924 Words  | 2 Pages

    Donohue, Nathan. "Understanding the Decision to Drop the Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki." CSIS.org. CSIS Center for Strategic and International Studies, 10 Aug. 2012. Web. 07 Jan. 2014.

    Read More

  • Speech To The Association Of Los Alamos Scientists

    822 Words  | 2 Pages

    Imagine a society where everyone has a different opinion about dropping an atomic bomb to country that they are fighting with. What is an atomic bomb? An atomic bomb is a bomb which derives its destructive power from the rapid release of nuclear energy by fission of heavy atomic nuclei, causing damage through heat, blast, and radioactivity. The atomic bomb is a tremendously questionable topic. Nonetheless, these literary selections give comprehension on the decision about dropping the atomic bomb for military purposes. For example, the “Speech to the Association of Los Alamos Scientists” by Robert Oppenheimer, argues that we should have drop the atomic bomb, “A Petition to the President of the United States” by 70 scientists, asks President

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb DBQ

    1342 Words  | 3 Pages

    A flash of light, then blackness. That was all that the citizens of Hiroshima could see on August 6th, 1945. That was the day that changed everything. At 8:15 in the morning, an American B-29 bomber dropped the very first atomic bomb. Three days later, another atomic bomb was dropped on the Japanese city of Nagasaki. These two bombs killed over 120,000 instantly. Tens of thousands would die later due to other complications, such as radiation exposure. 6 days after the second bomb was dropped, Emperor Hirohito announced the surrender of Japan in World War II. Seconds after the announcement was made, there was celebration all over the world, especially in America. But, the atomic bomb still happened, and it still has drastic effects on the citizens

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb Decision

    1250 Words  | 3 Pages

    The year was 1945. World War II was nearly over. Germany had been defeated and the allied forces were sure to win the war. The only unsure thing was how many lives would be lost in defeating Japan. The United States decided to drop the atomic bomb on August 6, 1945. On that day the Enola Gay dropped "Little Boy" on Hiroshima. Three days later the United States dropped "Fat Boy" on Nagasaki. 240,000 civilians, mostly women and children, lost there lives on these two days. On August 14, 1945 Japan surrendered unconditionally. Was it necessary? I believe that the U.S. could have used other means to bring about the end of the war. This paper will note a few reasons for dropping the bomb, followed by a discussion of several alternatives to it's the use.

    Read More

  • Why the United States dropped the Atomic Bomb

    1239 Words  | 3 Pages

    Why did the United States drop the Atomic Bomb? The atomic bomb is the subject of much controversy. Since its first detonation in 1945, the entire world has heard the aftershocks of that blast. Issues concerning nuclear weapons sparked the Cold War. We also have the atomic bomb to thank for our relative peace at this time due to the fear of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD).

    Read More

  • The Decision of a Lifetime: Dropping the Atomic Bomb on Japan

    1989 Words  | 4 Pages

    Maddox, Robert. “The Biggest Decision: Why We Had to Drop the Atomic Bomb.” Taking Sides: Clashing View in United States History. Ed. Larry Madaras & James SoRelle. 15th ed. New York, NY. 2012. 280-288.

    Read More

  • Structural Realism after the Cold War

    984 Words  | 2 Pages

    The prominent scholar of Political Science, Kenneth N. Waltz, founder of neorealism, has proposed controversial realist theories in his work. Publications such as "Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis", "Theory of International Politics” and “The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate,” demonstrate how Waltz's approach was motivated by the American military power. In acquaintance of this fact, the purpose of this paper is to critically analyze Waltz theoretical argument from the journal "Structural Realism after the Cold War". Firstly, this paper will indicate the author's thesis and the arguments supporting it. Secondly, limitations found in theoretical arguments will be illustrated and thirdly, synergies between the author's thesis and this analysis will be exposed.

    Read More

  • Problems with Iran

    3797 Words  | 8 Pages

    Problems with Iran Iran is a country located in the Middle East. The main source of income for the country is oil, the one object that had greatly influenced its history. Iran's present government is run as an Islamic Republic. A president, cabinet, judicial branch, and Majilesor or legislative branch, makes up the governmental positions. A revolution that overthrew the monarch, which was set in 1930, lasted over 15 years.

    Read More

  • Essay On Iran

    2588 Words  | 6 Pages

    Iran, which was also formerly known as Persia, has an interesting history that affects the modern day culture of the region. Iran is known for one of the world’s oldest major civilizations which has roots dating back to 4000 BC. First, the Medes occupied the region; they unified Iran as a nation and major empire. Iran was ruled by a series of empires and dynasties, starting with The Achaemenid Empire which ruled from 550-330 bce all the way to Iran’s last dynasty, The Pahlavi Dynasty, which was in power from 1925-1941 ce. The Iranian Revolution or the Islamic Revolution put an end to the dynasties in Iran after the shahs (kings) started incorporating Western ideals and philosophies into society. This brought sharp objections from religious people and they started viewing the Shahs as anti-Islamic which eventually lead to the Ayatollah regaining power over the nation. In order to have a basic understanding of the issues facing Iran today it is important to look at the past and have an understanding of the modern history of this complex nation.

    Read More

More about Why Iran Should Get The Bomb Analysis

Open Document