Why Do Businesses Have Responsibility To Be Charitable?

1208 Words3 Pages

Do Businesses have a responsibility to be charitable? Phillip Truax 10985444 I will argue that businesses do not have a responsibility to be charitable and reach social ends. Milton Friedman argued for a stronger protection of economic rights in order for industrial as well as commercial growth to take place. Milton Friedman also argued that corporations have no responsibility to keep the environment clean, end unemployment, etc. Businesses have one responsibility: to maximize profits. I believe Milton Friedman is right in saying that in order for corporations to be successful they must maximize their profits, their first priority is not to make ends meet within society. If their priorities are not in line, the business may shut down. (Friedman 1970, 593) As stated in the thesis statement above, a business’s number one priority should be to maximize profits without cutting corners. Unless you are dealing with a corporation such as a hospital or a not-for-profit. I am very familiar with this argument because I have witnessed my parents run a pallet business …show more content…

A corporation is an artificial person and in this sense may have artificial responsibilities, but business as a whole cannot be said to have responsibilities. The first step toward clarity in examining the doctrine of the social responsibility of business is to ask precisely what it implies for whom.” (Friedman 1970, 593) This quote is relevant to this argument because a business is not a person, it has no ethics nor morals. Therefore it is impossible for a business to take action towards the responsibilities others bestowed upon it. Implying that a corporation has responsibilities to society is wrong, implying that the people who run this corporation is a different story. The corporate executives who run these corporations have many different responsibilities whether they be to their families, their communities, their friends, etc. (Friedman 1970,

Open Document