Why Did Great Britain Win The Seven Years War

846 Words2 Pages

Due to the Great Britain having to become involved in the Seven Years’ War because the colonists could not win and were having troubles with it, Great Britain acquired a large amount of debt. Since this debt was acquired through, in their eyes, the colonists failure to defend themselves the British government decided that the colonists needed to be taxed in order to pay the debt back and since they were unable to fight for themselves they needed increased British troops, more taxes, and Britain needed to take control of the colonies so they did not cause any more damage. This was done through a series of acts and proclamations. There were many acts and proclamations that Great Britain implemented as a means to take more control over the thirteen …show more content…

This was also a result of Great Britain assuming they would need to step in and fight a war that the colonists instigated because the colonists failure to win the Seven Years’ War without assistance made the British troops opinion in their military abilities greatly decline. The colonists were angered by this proclamation because after a hundred years of salutary neglect they had formed their own governments and culture and way of doing things, and having the British government decide that they needed to be oversaw was a metaphorical slap in the face to them and offended them. The colonists also did not like that Great Britain was interfering in the colonies ability to expand westward. Another implementation by Great Britain as a way to take more control over the thirteen colonies and pay back debts was the Quartering Act which stated that colonists must house and feed British troops even in times of peace. This was implemented because Great Britain could not afford to build forts and buy food for the troops that were staying there long term while thy were still paying off the massive debts from the Seven Years’ War so this was a means to cut down on military costs. They …show more content…

Taxation without representation is still used today as the moto for Washington D.C. because Washington D.C. has no representation in Congress but its residents are still taxed by the government, much like the colonist were by the British. This has caused certain problems in Washington D.C., like how it caused problems between the colonists and British just to a much lesser extent. The difference in the situation with Washington D.C. is that the United States government was willing to compromise. In order for Washington D.C. to have a representative they would need to become a state and while congress cannot currently do that without conflicting with the principles of federalism, the national government allowed Washington D.C. to have a local government instead in turn for taxing them with no representation. This is a significant difference from what was happening between the colonies and Great Britain because Great Britain was unwilling to compromise. Great Britain took greater control over the colonies economically and politically through increased taxes, acts, and proclamations because of a gigantic influx in debt that needed to be paid as a result in Great Britain’s intervention in the Seven Years’ war because the colonists were failing to win. This

Open Document