Who Was She Libby Copeland Analysis

837 Words2 Pages

The Simple DNA Test
Libby Copeland, author of "Who was she? A DNA test only opened new mysteries," uses many different literary elements to inform the readers of The Washington Post of what taking a "simple" DNA test can do to you and your family. Copeland uses Alice Collins Plebuch and a few others’ stories and discoveries to secure the point clearly. Exposition, tone, and repetition are just a few those elements. Moreover, exposition is an element used to give the readers background information before actually going into the story, or the rest of the article. By explaining the history of DNA, Copeland uses the technique of exposition. “Over the past five years, as the price of DNA testing kits has dropped and their quality has improved, …show more content…

Repetition is used numerous by Copeland throughout it. She uses it to assemble her main point that there are consequences to taking the DNA test. The results can affect your family. “Doing DNA testing for fun can carry consequences few of us might anticipate. It requires little investment at the outset, but it has the potential to utterly change our lives.” Copeland starts off with using Plebuch’s story. Plebuch wanted to just do a DNA test for fun, but the results contradicted what she was told as a kid. This lead Plebuch to become curious and take more and more tests. The tests weren’t just her DNA; plenty of other people got tested to help Plebuch uncover the “hidden secret.” The simple test for Plebuch became an investment and time consuming process that lasted over two years. Once the results where back, she realized there was no secret but a mistake. Plebush discovery didn’t cause any hatred or pity from either family. The finding actually brought the families closer together. Copeland once more reminds us “DNA testing can also yield to uncomfortable surprises.” This was the case for Laurie Pratt. She found out that her father wasn’t actually her father. When trying to explain the man, her biological father, he was ashamed and never answered

Open Document