Who Is Responsible For The Killing Of Mark Duggan Essay

A country with no justice is a country with no peace. The killing of Mark Duggan happened about seven years ago on the 4th of august 2011. Mark Duggan was shot dead in Tottenham, North London, after specialist firearms officers had stopped the cab he was in, on grounds of being in possesion of a firearm, he was later killed by a specialist police marksman also known as V53. A lot of investigations on the killing of Mark Duggan have been carried out as to account for his killing. The police officer, V53 has been blamed by many people for his fatal shootings but there has never been anyone to look into the matter of this police brutality as the government has shown a lot of reluctance within this matter (Davis, 2017). From previous research there

Many people in London are not willing to accept murder as a form of justice as previous research reports and most especially the family of Mark Duggan. Duggan’s family together with many other people opposes the lawful killing arguing that the killing was not properly justified. On the other hand, the state of London carried out investigations and found out that the killing was vindicated and thus it was a lawful killing according to the metropolitan police. The report given by the government to mark the accountability of the killing of Mark Duggan lawfuly took a period of three and half years to be written and had been announced to the public and the family of Mark Duggan. The mother of Mark Duggan, Pamela Duggan said that the state’s report was just like a slap in the face because it took much time to come up with the report and thus Pamela as the mother of Mark did not trust the report. To some extent, Pamela Duggan was right because it is impossible for a state of a nation to carry out investigations for the killing of one person for a period of more than three years meaning that the investigations had been interfered with by government officials in the fear of being blamed of having murdered someone. At each and every stage of the investigation, the state has been seen to avoid the blame of having murdered Mark Duggan and

In his theory, Stanley Cohen analyzed both political and social ways where human beings try to avoid the realities of life that make them uncomfortable like suffering, injustices and poverty (Cohen, 2017). He also adds that there are forms of denial which are elementary and they may know about existence of something or may not know about something’s existence. This means that it is possible to have people who do not know or people who know about some matters of denial (Cohen, 2017). Stanley Cohen’s theory of denial states that some people could be knowing facts about something but still deny that it exists. For instance, many people know that racial oppression occurs yet they deny it. Other people like the state officials of the government can witness real acts of racial oppression among other evil actions like those of slavery or any other kind of suffering yet they deny the happening of such actions (Cohen, 2017). In this case, Mark Duggan’s killing can also be associated to Stanley Cohen’s theory of denial whereby the officials of the state of London could have known the truth behind the killing of Mark Duggan but they denied it to the public to avoid the public blame on the state (Cohen, 2017). The theory of denial can also be associated with the fact that black people were denied life by the society and killing Mark