Whistleblowing Case Study

1053 Words3 Pages

1) Compare and Contrast
• a. Maggie Severns’ opinion on whistleblowing is that the people involved are just trying to better the government. Severns states in her interview that there are different types of whistleblowing, and that “data dumps” are not the best way to ensure an effective government, or to make the difference intended. Also, in the interview Severns states that anonymity in whistleblowing makes it less effective, since there needs to be a face attached to the situation to make people remember. Severns draws an interesting parallel with whistleblowing and movies, we as humans like narratives, and with a face attached to the whistleblowing, we relate to it more.
• b. Frederick Elliston states the three different situations surrounding whistleblowing. The first being public whistleblowing, the second anonymous whistleblowing, and the third whistleblowing to a leader or trusted supervisor. Each of these situations have pros and cons, and have a appropriate situation with respective possible dangers and consequences, along with the appropriate seriousness of the situation. Another point Elliston brings up is that with anonymous whistleblowing being an option, there is the chance that the information may be false, or that the person leaking the information may be doing so for they’re own gain, instead of the best interest of the …show more content…

I agree with Maggie Severns opinion. I agree that whistleblowers do what they do to help the cooperation or government. I also agree that certain types of whistleblowing, such as data dump, are not helpful or effective since they are not thought out, and therefore not guaranteed that only helpful information is being released. Sevens statement “[whistleblowing] anonymously is far less effective,” is one I also agree with. Elliston has certain scenarios and ideas that I agree with, such as the seriousness and relevance of the information being released should lessen the consequences released on the

Open Document