What Is Mrs. Spring Fragrance's Reasoning Behind The American Dress

1214 Words3 Pages

Mrs. Spring Fragrance, in Sui Sui Far’s The Inferior Woman, can be read as a subversive narrative as a means to comprehend the reasoning behind the rising American popularity of material Orientalism amongst white women during the 1870s and 1920s. Mari Yoshihara, a scholar in American studies with an emphasis on Asian relations, claims that “the material culture of Orientalism packaged the mixed interests Americans had about Asia—Asia as a seductive, aesthetic, refined culture, and Asia as foreign, premodern, Other—and made them into unthreatening objects for collection and consumption” (17). Mrs. Spring Fragrance subverts Yoshihara’s American and Asian dynamic by viewing white women as seductive, elusive, and foreign in an effort to turn …show more content…

Spring Fragrance’s appropriation of American dresses follows the trajectory of Yoshihara’s reasoning for the rise of material Orientalism. She is quick to launch into an anecdote involving her opinion on American dresses in regards to how tastes evolve: “’When I first came to America…my husband desired me to wear the American dress. I protested and declared that never would I so appear. But one day he brought home a gown fit for a fairy, and ever since then I have worn and adored the American dress.’” Mrs. Spring Fragrance’s initial reaction to the dress is telling—she categorized the American dress initially as a negative Other. However, her husband sexualizes American women and uses the object that is the dress as a vehicle for, what Yoshihara calls, seductiveness. The original threatening Other aspect of dress becomes so far removed from the American woman once seductiveness is involved. The trait of seductiveness does not remain with the object of the American woman, but is instead attributed to an unearthly fairy. Although it has been given a positive connotation, it is also not permanent object that weighs on her Asian identity. It is as easily removed as it is worn. It is appropriation at the will of colonizers, Mrs. and Mr. Spring Fragrance. The Spring Fragrance’s appropriation also isn’t limited to the tangible objects that serve as extensions of the white woman object. Mrs. Spring Fragrance is also guilty of appropriating the ideologies produced by the white …show more content…

Spring Fragrance desires to write an “immortal” book about the experiences of white women. While she calls all Americans “mysterious, inscrutable, [and] incomprehensible,” she is fixated on the American dichotomy of superior and inferior women. So much so, that her husband encourages her to seek out the superior woman, Mrs. Evebrook, to understand the dichotomy further. The interaction begins, as mentioned before, anthropologically and distanced. Her presence is soon acknowledged and she shares how she plans to curate her literary immortality: “My book I shall take from the words of others….I listen to what is said, I apprehend, I write it down.” Mrs. Spring Fragrance is clearly appropriating white women by “apprehending” them. She is appropriating the lives of white women and repurposing in a book for her own benefit. She can passively enjoy American objects while maintaining her Asian autonomy. Ultimately she may apprehend the white woman, write a book about the white woman, profit off the white woman, but she never has to be one

Open Document