What Are The Similarities Between Lord Of The Flies And Siddhartha

1108 Words3 Pages

All too often, people chose to only hear what they want to hear. This is a universal truth of mankind, and can be found all throughout literature. Moreover, this can result in the will and beliefs of an individual to be neglected in favor of the common belief, or the majority opinion. The favoring of the group as opposed to the individual is a main theme in numerous books and speaks greatly about human nature. In Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, Siddhartha, by Herman Heese, and To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee, the will of an individual challenges the will of the group and or society, with distinctively similar outcomes.

Simon, in Lord of the Flies, stands up against the common beliefs of the group. When the group is discussing …show more content…

For example, Siddartha chooses not to join the brahmins, which goes against what most people do to find enlightenment. Siddhartha goes against the grain to forge his own path as opposed to following the standard brahmin path to enlightenment. He realizes that the brahmins are influenced by wealth and lack the true dedication necessary to reach enlightenment, even though it is presumed that he will become a brahmin. Instead, Siddartha chooses to starve himself and join the samanas, as he believes that he needs to go on his own journey, away from home and the standard path. Later in the book, Siddhartha hears about a man called, the Buddha, who has reached enlightenment. After finding and following the Buddha, Siddhartha still feels incomplete, and far from enlightenment. Siddhartha realizes that enlightenment is an individual journey and thus cannot be completed as a group, or in the same way as another person. Siddartha chooses to leave the Buddha and his dear friend Govinda, in search of his own path, once again, going against the societal norm. Finally, Siddhartha is proven right as he reaches enlightenment, while the masses are no closer to enlightenment than when they began their journeys. Siddhartha reached enlightenment finally, after following the river by himself. He realizes, correctly, that the river represents and embodies life as a whole. As a result, Siddhartha is …show more content…

For instance, Atticus guards Tom Robinson all night to assure that he is safe. Atticus is right in doing this as if he had not, the mob would have killed Tom. The mob consists of a large number of men from all over Maycomb and the surrounding areas and thus represents the majority. Atticus, along with Jem and Scout, who represent the individual or minority, successfully stand up to the mob and defend not only Tom, but their beliefs too. Furthermore, Atticus explains to Scout that he knew that he would not win the case, but still took it as he could not live with himself if he had not. Here, Atticus explains to Scout that it is important to stand up for what you know is right, even if most people get angry at you for doing it. Atticus realizes that he most likely would not be able to save Tom, but he could not live with himself if he did not try, and stand up for what he thought was right at the same time. Atticus’ beliefs differ from most of the town’s beliefs, yet Atticus still stands up for what he knows is fair, which is a fair trial with an impartial jury. Later in the book, Tom is found guilty, despite Atticus’ efforts. Once again, the people, in this case the jury, only heard what they wanted to hear, as people tend to do. The jury went into the trial with the assumption that the black man, Tom, is clearly guilty and nothing would change their mind. It is easier for the jury

Open Document