More handpicked essays just for you.
Situational leadership incorporated in companies today
Comparing and contrasting the three leadership models in terms of inputs and outputs
Situational leadership theory is useful and relevant
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Contingency Theories Of Leadership: A Focus On The Situational Leadership Model
Name
Institutional Affiliation Contingency Theories Of Leadership: A Focus On The Situational Leadership Model
Introduction
The situational leadership model in essence suggests that there is nothing like a one size fits all approach with regards to leadership. Therefore, depending on the situation at hand, there are varying levels of management and leadership that are deemed necessary. However, all leaders are encouraged to first identify their most vital priorities or tasks with regard to leadership and management. Again, the same leaders ought to consider their readiness levels and also the readiness levels of their followers by simply analyzing the group’s willingness and abilities. As a result, depending on these kinds of variables, all leaders ought to apply the most effective leadership style that is best suited to the given situation. Situational leadership is divided into four
…show more content…
1. What is the situational leadership model?
2. How do you assess willingness in the situational leadership model?
3. How do you assess ability in the situational leadership model?
4. Where is the situational leadership model most appropriate?
5. What are the benefits of the situational leadership model?
6. What are the drawbacks of the situational leadership model?
Lastly, the following three resources will be of great help in understanding this topic and executing the project requirements effectively.
Reference
Hughes, R. L., Ginnett, R. C., & Curphy, G. J. (2015). Leadership: Enhancing the lessons of experience (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
Watkins, D. (2001). Situational Leadership Model. Center for Leadership Studies [online], 1.
Graeff, C. L. (2003). The situational leadership theory: A critical view. Academy of management review, 8(2),
Hughes, R. L., Ginnett, R. C., & Curphy, G. J. (2012). Leadership: Enhancing the lessons of experience. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin
Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. (n.d.) Situational Leadership. In Wren, J.T. (Ed.). (1995). The Leader’s Companion (pp. 207-211). New York: Simon & Schuster.
In the context of the Situational model leadership theory, there are three identifiable weaknesses in my leadership practice. These weaknesses represent shortcomings in my role as a leader and might prevent my team from fully executing the organization’s mission. The three weaknesses are:
A situational leader is the one who will use a different leadership style according to the need and specific situation at the moments.
Situational leadership is a theory which was designed in 1969 by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard. The “contingency theories of leadership” states that a leader’s effectiveness is dependent on their behaviours in relation to different situational factors. Thus, situational leadership theory, relates to how a leader 's effectiveness is depend on their ability to adjust their leadership behaviour to the required level of the “followers” capability or if the situation is modified.
The situational leadership theory states that leaders use different styles and strategies depending on the situation. There are two models that support this theory. The Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness states that an “effective leadership occurs only when there is an ideal match between the leader’s style and the group’s work situation” (pg
Kouzes, J., & Posner, B., (2007). The leadership challenge, (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-
Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. p. 1-19. Retrieved from http://www.blackdiamond.dk/HDO/Organisation_Gary_Yukl_Leadership_in_Organizations.pdf
Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory (SLT) asserts that a leader’s effectiveness is dependent upon the readiness, or ability and willingness, of the leader’s followers to complete a task. This leadership style is an amalgamation of task-oriented and relationship-oriented characteristics that are employed depending upon the situation and the followers involved. According to the SLT, as followers increase in readiness the leader’s style is to adapt accordingly (Kinicki & Kreitner, 2009).
Peus, C., Braun, S., & Frey, D. (2013). Situation-based measurement of the full range of leadership model—Development and validation of a situational judgment test. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(5), 777-795.
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2012). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary
Northouse, P. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Lussier, R.N. & Achua, C.F. (2010). Leadership: Theory, application, skill development (5th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.
Those who take this approach assess the current situation by identifying its major factors, then focus and act on those aspects of the situation (McNamara). In his book, “Leadership Management: Achieving Breakthroughs,” K. Barman writes that by adopting the Contingency theory, the manager believes that there is no correct or best way of leading; what works in one situation may not necessarily work in another. Due to this assumption, one can say that contingency theory is similar to situational theory; there is no single, simple, or exact way to handle all situations, and effective management depends on the situation (50). Contingency theory is different from situational theory, however. He writes,
The Situational Theories of leadership explain how leadership style must be tailored to the demands of the task and the qualities of subordinates.