Were The Indians Seulveda Summary

578 Words2 Pages

Short Writing Assignment: Argument Identification Were the pre-Columbian Indians in the “New World” human beings according to Sepulveda? In Sepulveda’s text Prologue to the Members of the Congregation you must cite 3 different pieces of evidence in support of the interpretation that Sepulveda believed the Indians were sub-human beings in the sense that they were like animals (i.e. horses, cattle, etc.). Sepulveda uses the word ‘Subdue’ meaning to kill and dominate towards the Indians because he believes they are all barbaric. He believed that if you’re not a Christian you are a barbarian. Sepulveda states that the barbarians are savages and didn't have an organized society, believing that the Spanish were superior to the Indians. …show more content…

In Defense of the Indians Bartolome de las Casas offers an argument against Sepulveda’s view of the Indians. What premises does Las Casas offer to support the conclusion that the Indians are human beings? Las Casas argues that that there are 4 types of barbarians, but only the 3rd kind is barbarian, those who are considered “freaks of nature.” Las Casas believed the Spanish were out to help the Indians, even though they were barbarians and not Christian. It is stated in The Soul “For the good and all-powerful God, in his love for mankind, he created all things for man’s use and protects him whom he has endowed with so many qualities by a singular affection and care.” In conclusion, the Indians were made by God, so it is impossible for them to be imperfect. 3. Are the Indians barbarian according to Bartolome de las

Open Document