Were The Colonists Justified To Rebel?

884 Words2 Pages

Justification to Rebel In the mid eighteenth century colonist of the new world started to rebel against Britain. Living in the colonies cost Britain a great deal of money Colonist did not like that they were being taxed. There were several acts passed that angered the colonists. For example, the Stamp Act, the Stamp Act was passed in 1765 taxed all legal documents including newspapers and other printed materials. The Stamp Act affected all that bought printed materials and it did not affect the poor because it was not too expensive. The colonist started to rebel and boycotted “No taxation without representation.” The colonists rebelled in many ways one of them was the Boston Tea Party. The Boston Tea Party occurred in 1773 as an act of revolt colonists threw tea cargo of a ship to the ocean. These acts of Britain towards the new colonies caused colonist to revolve and declare war to separate from Britain. The colonists were not justified to going to war to break away from Britain because England was paying more taxes and the mother country deserved absolute respect; however, the colonists were justified to break away from Britain because they were taxed without representation. It is important to realize that not only did the colonist pay taxes, but the British …show more content…

New England should have respected the mother country more. Great Britain did not do anything threatening to justify colonist to war. Colonist might have not understood how Great Britain was working at the time. Charles Inglis a minister wrote, “So far, Britain has not exerted her power. Her number of troops and ships of war here at present, is very little more that she judged to be necessary in time of peace.” This gives some evidence of how Britain did not have many protection, because it was no necessary, or so they thought. Colonists had no justification to go to war the mother country was not doing anything to provoke

Open Document