Were Late Nineteenth-Century Immigrants Uprooted Summary

945 Words2 Pages

Were Late Nineteenth-Century Immigrants “Uprooted”? YES/NO SUMMARY: In the yes summary “Oscar Handlin asserts that immigrants to the United States in the late nineteenth century were alienated from the cultural traditions of the homeland they had left as well as from those of their adopted country.” On the other hand Professor Wyman “argues that as many as four million immigrants to the United States between 1880 and 1930 viewed their trip as temporary and remained tied psychologically to their homeland to which they returned once they had accumulated enough wealth to enable them to improve their status back home.” BODY: I do not agree with either professor, they both state an argument that is too broad of an argument. Either they did not bring their …show more content…

And the people that accept the other cultures are actually defending these immigrates, fighting to defend a culture that they are not a part of, due to the fact that they accept the fact that everyone should have a voice and should be able to live their lives the way they want. Many individuals may have gone back, but the ones that decided to stay integrated their cultures into the Americans. They brought their cultures, traditions, languages, food, and so much more intelligence, they stayed passed their information to their descendants and to anyone who wanted to learn. Like recently in the Presidential Debates immigration continues to be a topic of discussion once again, just like in previous years. With the levels of immigration only increasing towards this twenty first time period, the election has sparked a debate on whether or not to allow the immigrate, illegal immigrates to stay or to kick them out of the country they came to seek solace, refugee or anything else they are seeking to

Open Document