Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Contrast between cultures
Differences between two cultures
Differences between two cultures
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Education became one of the most controversial topics, nowadays, because of it is importance. People around the world are debating on the best way to teach students. Some of them say that student should be memorizing every line of every book, while others argues that students should be given some basic information. After that they should be taught how to think freely, and come up with their own ideas. The two writers Sydney J. Harris and Kie Ho discussed this topics sharing the same opinion in “What True Education Should Do,” and “We Should Cherish Our Children’s Freedom to Think.” They believe that students should have the ability to be creative, and should be given enough space to think and share their ideas. Sydney J. Harris argues that student always complain of not having time to learn the subject by really understanding the concepts and implications because they have a lot of topics to cover in a very short period, so they just memorize the information for the sake of passing the exam. Harris believes that student should be given the opportunity to show their knowledge, and to truly learn the subject. For example, if the student should study ten chapters of biology for his exam. He would be focusing on memorizing more than he is learning about the chapters, so if he is studying to be a doctor, and he should know the function of every …show more content…
He favors the American style of education because in his country teachers make student memorize unnecessary information, while his son is learning how to be creative, and how to think freely. As he tries to justify his reasons for advocating the American educational system he says “Would We, however, prefer to stuff the developing little heads of our children with hundreds of geometry problems, the names of rivers in Brazil and 50 lines from The Canterbury Tales?” (Ho p.
Amongst the many arguments that Gatto makes in his article, one of the ones that stands out the most is the one that schooling is created to deteriorate any type of originality in an individual. Gatto argues that not only does school train kids to think they should “consume nonstop” but “even better” it “encouraged them not to think at all” (Gatto154). Gatto believes that schools are creating absent minded individuals that can only think about consuming so that the businesses are the only one benefitting. Critical thinking once again gives the solution to such accusation. Critical thinking can create more open minded individual or students rather than absent minded ones .When students truly reflect and analyze information they are doing more than memorizing it, they are understanding it and finding where they can apply it in their everyday lives. The students are expanding their horizons and developing various ways of thinking and seeing situation rather than just the same fixed positions all the time. A school with open minded individuals can create a better atmosphere too because the students will feel more comfortable expressing original new ideas without the fear of being mocked or ridiculed. Open minded individuals can propose new ideas that can benefit the class as a whole such as a new insightful way of seeing a poem or an idea for a
In this method of education, according to Freire, students never think critically or develop ideas. The second type of education is labeled “problem-posing”. Freire makes it very clear that he is an advocate of the “problem-posing” method of education. He believes in encourages communication and better comprehension of what the students are learning. “Yet only through communication can human life hold meaning…the teacher cannot think for his students, nor can he impose his thought on them” (Freire 216). Freire argues that the only real form of educatio...
One teacher may adopt the banking concept while the other may utilize the problem-posing concept. However, while problem-posing education generates creativity by giving students the ability to communicate, banking education does not. Freire asserts that in the “banking” concept of education, “the teacher chooses the program content, and the students (who were not consulted) adapt to it” (217). Freire indicates that students, who are victims of banking education, have no control over how an instructor chooses to teach. Therefore, creativity is destroyed by the fact that it was not even permitted in the first place. Students are not able to express their opinions or solve problems using their own methods because in order to pass the class, students not only need to adapt to the teaching style of their professors but think like them too. Freire’s quote relates to experiences I have had with “banking” teachers throughout my twelve years of formal education. Those teachers only taught using textbooks, therefore, they insisted that the textbook was always right. If I were to solve a math problem using a technique different from the book, then I would not get points for the problem even though my answer was right. And if I were to interpret an open-ended essay different from how my teacher would then my interpretations would be wrong. By doing this, my teachers destroyed my creativity. I was prohibited from my own thoughts and penalized if I expressed them. The only alternative for me was to become a “robot” that followed the orders of authorities, but being a “robot” was not something I was ashamed of. In fact, my role as a “robot” led me to better understand the “drama of Education” in which teachers attempt to “regulate the way the world ‘enters into’ the students”. I was able to figure out that my own teachers had tried to handle the way the world “entered into me” by
The fostering of independent thought is sometimes forgone in today's educational system. At times, students are encouraged to just complete their assignment instead of thinking about what they are doing so that they may fully understand their...
The American system of education is considered to be one of the most progressive in the world. One of the surveys on attitudes toward teaching around the world found that the United States is unique in its strong emphasis on "good teaching." My experience at State College has helped me to understand better how this system works, and what methods and techniques American teachers use to motivate their students for creative and active learning. However, I can also see that this system doesn’t work perfectly in every classroom. Reading Ernest Boyer’s article “Creativity in the Classroom” helped me with my understanding of the main problem that nowadays exists with the American college education system. According to the author, the problem is that teachers and students don’t see each other as one team doing the same business; therefore, in most classrooms the process of learning becomes a boring procedure instead of being mind-blowing. Moreover, reading this article, I could analyze the reasons of this problem that the author identifies through my own experiences at State College.
Absolute guarantees are never a good idea. "Telling your child 'We'll definitely be okay' isn't really accurate. Better to use qualifying terms, such as 'Most planes don't crash,'" says Brooks. These responses quell fears but are still honest.
In this notable Ted Talk video "Do schools kill creativity?", Sir Ken Robinson discusses how public education systems demolish creativity because they believe it is essential to the academic growth and success of students. Robinson created a broad arrange of arguments to persuade the viewers to take action on this highly ignored issue, and he primarily focuses on how important creativity is. There are classes within schools that help utilize creativity, but they are not taken seriously by adults in society. Therefore, the value of creative knowledge decreases. Robinson uses an unusual combination of pathos and ethos to make an enjoyable dispute for implementing an education system that nurtures rather than eats away at creativity.
By educating children, we need to prepare them for the life in a fast changing society where they can be responsive, fulfilled and innovative. The ability to use methods of teaching and learning within the curriculum is important when trying to make it possible. Countless amounts of schools have already been familiarising themselves with the importance of creativity and ways of how to teach, how to make the learning more holistic, more engaging and more creative. With the new curriculum complete, there are consequently many more opportunities and challenges for teachers to provide the best and most appropriate learning opportunities for the pupils they teach. The White Paper on education, publicising the new curriculum, stated it ‘creates scope for teachers to inspire’. It foresees ‘teachers taking greater control over what is taught in schools, innovating in how the...
... the limits of knowledge are broken by the liberty of imagination the creativity crisis will remain, until it is recognized that knowledge must not override, but reinforce creativity. Education is now stereotyped to be monotonous lectures within a classroom, and school has become correlated with some sort of painstaking suffering. People label school as boring. Another circle. Round and round, like a clock that continuously runs its course, there are no surprises, simply facts and truths. But the “what ifs” that are derived from a step out of time, out of reality, out of the circle, can initiate change. So ask a person the most valued objects in his or her life, and if he or she responds with education, ask why. Because education should not be just about getting smart enough to get a job. Education must tell people to leave the circle of knowledge and create change.
Education has a large impact on the future of societies. Tagore’s essay, “To Teachers” describes how schools should promote creativity and introduce children to different races and viewpoints, all while being in touch with nature. Nussbaum’s essay, “Education for the Profit, Education for Democracy” describes how students should be taught about politics and that education can improve the government. The authors, Tagore and Nussbaum, share similar ideas including how schools fail to give students creative exploration and how to teach students about different backgrounds; however, they have different viewpoints on how and where students should learn. Both authors think that the world can be a better place through education.
...on at a time, so no one will be so stressed to learn all the information in one night.”This viable information will help with retaining the information more pricesly when the test comes around. Clearly using all of the available advice and on contemplating alternative scenarios will help any being, even the Professor, make wise decisions.
Freire states “Freedom is acquired by conquest, not by gift. It must be pursued constantly and responsibly” (Freire, 2000, p. 47). Therefore; students must be aware of their oppression and fight for their freedom and autonomy in the school system. Freire also suggests a method of education that will help solve this issue: problem-posing education. The dynamic concept of problem-posing education integrates both teachers and students role’s to create a unified teaching process in which the teacher teaches the student, and the student teaches the teacher. This process “reinvents” knowledge, and teaches the student critical thinking. Instead of knowledge being deposited to students, problem-posing education presents information to students but allows them to draw their own conclusions and form their own, unique
Is thinking for one’s self worth potentially having the wrong answer? Would it be worth it for students to go through school without having to think for themselves? In the articles “Learning by Heart” by Susan Tanner and “Diagnosing and Treating the Ophelia Syndrome” by Thomas Plummer it examples how children were taught from a young age to answer questions routinely, the way the teacher prefers. The issue with this is that the student never develops the ability to think for themselves. The articles discuss the different advantages and disadvantages for developing this skill. They provide steps and resources for one to reach independent thinking. The articles explain the positive and negative advantages of memorizing and reciting past writings. These articles share that individual thinking and memorization will help students learn more efficiently.
According to Google, creativity is defined as “the use of the imagination or original ideas, especially in the production of an artistic work.” In his TED Talk, which is one of “the most popular talks of all time”, Sir Ken Robinson discusses how public education systems degrade creativity as an essential component within the academic growth of all students. Robinson is a creativity expert and an author who writes books about creativity in school systems. His expertise in the field of school systems and creativity justifies his opinion on the subject. Robinson concentrates on the significance of creativity by creating a variety of strong arguments. His main contention is that “creativity now is as important in education as literacy” (Robinson).
If you want to be a creative person, you should be far away from school. Nowadays, the topic of the relationship between innovation and creativity has attracted attention from all aspects of society. At most situations, schools do affect innovation. But instead of saying schools “suppress” creativity, it is more accurate to say school “affect” education.