Water Pollution Essay

1485 Words3 Pages

Water is one of Earth's most precious resources. It is especially valuable for human beings who need to drink it in order to survive. Everyone needs clean and safe water to drink. In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ensures that bodies of water used for drinking are protected from pollution. It ensures that this water will not be contaminated. This is what they are supposed to do. However, sometimes they look the other way while industrial companies pollute the drinking water. They overlook violations and/or completely ignore the ways that these companies are polluting the water. In this research, I will look at some of the ways that the EPA is ignoring its responsibility to protect drinking water and stopping companies from polluting it. Since 2006, the EPA has been making reduces on the number of inspections they conduct per year. According to the Washington Post, these reduces will continue until 2018. Here is some of the data: By 2018, the agency would conduct an average of 14,000 federal inspections and evaluations per year across the country. That’s a 33-percent dip from the annual EPA caseloads from 2005-09, and a 30-percent drop from 2012. By 2018, the EPA would initiate an average of 2,320 civil judicial and administrative enforcement cases a year in the five-year span. The drop: 41 percent from 2005-2009 figures, and 23 percent from 2012. And, by 2018, the agency envisions concluding 2,000 civil judicial and administrative enforcement cases per year, a 47-percent dip from the caseloads in 2005-09, and a 33-percent cut from 2012 (Hamby). The EPA has decided instead to focus on the worst offenders, those that have, “the most significant health, environmental, and deterrence impacts” (Hamby). T... ... middle of paper ... ...ect the water and enforce the law. The public, though, is not convinced. Several cases and lawsuits reveal that the EPA is not doing what it is supposed to be doing, and companies are getting away with polluting water sources. This is occurring all over the country in both rural and urban areas. The EPA says it would be able to respond more efficiently to complaints if the public used electronic reporting rather than paper reporting. However, this seems to be irrelevant as there is no data to show that the EPA responds more quickly to electronic reports. When all of these facts are taken into consideration, it is clear that the EPA has fallen behind in its duty to protect this country's water. Hopefully the attention given to this subject by watchdog groups and the media will make the public more aware of the problem so that they demand that the EPA change its ways.

Open Document