Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ideolgy of zombie films
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ideolgy of zombie films
After hearing about how awful this film was from friends and reading the reviews I wasn't optimistic entering this film. Sadly this film lived up to my abysmal exceptions, even though it sports a number of actors that I really do enjoy. Ving Rhames makes a return to the series, though this time he's playing Captain Rhodes. He's joined by Mena Suvari, and AnnaLynne McCord, who blew me away with her performance in Excision. Though even with all these excellent performers, Day of the Dead manages to be bland and generic. A poor job that doesn't live up to the original in a single aspect.
Day of the Dead opens with a group of kids, Trevor Bowman (Michael Welch), his girlfriend Nina (AnnaLynne McCord), his friend Kyle (Hugh Skinner) along with
…show more content…
Ving Rhames especially, as his Rhodes comes off far more like-able than Joseph Pilato's rendition. Though here the character fills a very different role. Ok, I also liked Mina Suvari and Stark Sands chemistry on …show more content…
The zombies in this film are uninteresting and bland. Something I didn't know zombies could be. I think its because they come off more as mutated people then they do the undead. My biggest peeves steam from Zombie Rhodes eating his own eye and the Zombies eat another Zombie. Which is a first for me as one of the generic zombie rules is that zombies don't eat their own. They eat us.
The effects are done in a clunky CGI, which doesn't do this film any favors. This Day of the Dead could have taken some pointers from the 1985 version in regards to effects. Since out of the two, with over twenty years of technological advancement this version look by far the worst.
Final thoughts, it's awful and lives up to its poor reputation. I can understand why this film was straight to video and I can't honestly suggest to anyone. As a fan of the zombie genre, this one nearly put me to sleep. Which is something a zombie film shouldn't do. Because even with all the action going on on-screen, Day of the Dead still managed to be boring.
All characters in the movie were played well by the actors in my opinion. They
... He really sold the part and did the part justice. Furthermore in the beginning of the flashback I had no idea who the main character was, but Christian developed the character subtly yet effectively.
Romero’s cult classic work “Night of the Living Dead” displayed characters enacting their stereotypes, portraying men and women in their stereotypical sexist behaviors. Themes of such stereotypes are hinted within the movie, hidden underneath the idea of carnal, flesh eating ghouls. The character Barbra, is the embodiment of the helpless woman in horror films. Ben, the power controlling domineering male of the remaining survivors in the farmhouse. Harry, another male figure who try to apply his strength and ego amongst the group. Helen, is depicted as the unhappy housewife who is semi-defiant to her husband. These portrayals accurately depicted the stereotypes America held during the 1960s, effectively mirroring the time in which it was
The sounds and music in this film are very realistic, and to the point. There is not anything abstract or out of place, and everything is very appropriate. The sound effects in the film are diegetic (sounds that the actors can hear), with the score being nondiegetic (sounds that the actors cannot hear). The film falls under the category of realism, with no stylizing or manipulation of images and sounds.
The zombie race is very different. It doesn't not have many abilities and is not advanced like humans. Their behavior patterns are different. They cannot stand cold or winter weather. Their behavior is very different and difficult to calculate. They usually stand around lingering and waiting to attack when they hear something. They follow noises.Some abilities that they do have is that they have excellent hearing and can walk but aren't blind.The also can smell human blood. Zombies are generally weak but don’t underestimate what they can do to a human.
The supporting players do well, though, specifically the two villains. James Mason is fantastic as Phillip Vandamm, the chief antagonist. He brings the perfect amount of collected cool to the role, but also adds a touch of menace to the character. Martin Landau, in an early role, also does well as Leonard, Vandamm’s right hand man. He’s the more sinister of the two and conveys it well, but he is also charismatic in a mysterious sort of
George Romero's reinvention of the zombie in night of the Living Dead (1968) is clearly a critique of elements of the American society, and the film as a whole is easily twisted into a warped view on the 'American Dream'. Themes throughout Romero’s film, dealing with controversial topics during the time that the film was made, are still, to this day debated by critics and film historians. Themes of racism and war are defined within the movie, hidden underneath the idea of carnal, cannibalistic zombies and over the top heroes who, eventually, succumb to the reanimated; despite their every effort. These themes are colored over and painted to hide beneath subtle references to the typical American Dream during this time, and Romero does quite the good job at it too. This dream, whilst continuously changing in the everyday lives of modern Americans, can be loosely defined as a national ethos of the United States, or a set of ideals dealing with freedom and the opportunity for success - an upward social status that can be achieved through hard work and effort.
Night of the Living Dead is an all-time classic horror film that took place in 1968, starring Duane Jones and Judith O’Dea. This movie jump started the “zombie apocalypse” hype which led to more and more zombie inspired horror films, but also many different genres of horror films. Night of the Living Dead would not be a horror film if it were not for, obviously the theme, but also the sound effects, special effects, lighting effects, the camera angles and shots, as well as the actor’s ability to strike certain emotions in their audience through the character’s emotions. This film was directed by George A. Romero who also wrote the screenplay, with the help of John A. Russo. From the beginning to end, this film captures its audience leaving
By far my favorite is the Hermit played brilliantly in a wordless performance by Jim Carry. He’s the most fascinating character and tragic character. He gives an entirely physical performance. You get a real sense of a fully formed character through the performance. Suki Waterhouse plays the films heroine. Like a lot of the characters in the film, she’s complicated. You feel bad for her because in the beginning of the film her arm and leg get cut off but on the other hand you can’t justify her actions. Strangely the character that might have the most dialogue is the character that doesn’t have that much screen time, Keanu Reeves is great as The Dream. In any other film he would be the bad guy, but he’s actually the best character on a moral level. He does not eat or kill people like some of the other characters. Jason Momoa plays one of the bodybuilding cannibals named Miami Man. Like Suki Waterhouse he’s a complicated character. In one scene he’s a good father and the next he’s eating someone. He’s very much the stoic badass type in this
De Niro is very good in the lead role as Michael. He is totally convincing throughout the movie, bringing authenticity to the role. He has a certain enigmatic quality and stoicism that serves the character well, especially in the
same cast as the first Mummy except the couples young son played by Freddie Boath. In
Robin William is known for his imitations in movies and he has such a large toolbox of them in this movie. He does Scottish, Hispanic, a few others. So sad that we won’t have another actor like him. I think the fact that they put Ewan McGregor as the leading role in this movie was a wonderful choice. He plays Obi Won Kanobi in Star Wars so he is perfect to be the courageous leading role in this movie.
It is fairly standard horror movie fare. There really weren’t many shots that stood out to me. That is not to say the cinematography is bad. Perhaps it says something about the writing and the characters, just how invested in the i was that i had a hard time noticing any of that stuff. In the end the cinematography and lighting does its job to create a suitably creepy atmosphere.
Which feels like a rip-off Night of the Living Dead. Not a call back or a homage, but a straight rip off. Weakening an already weak film. Other than that, not so bad. I really like the character Old Man Cadwell played by Robert Harris and is without at doubt the best part of this film.
The Day After, was viewed in the living room of my house on two occasions. The purpose of viewing this movie is to write a movie critique from my AP U.S. History 3rd block class. The objective of this overall story is to portray the event and effects that would occur if there were to be a nuclear war. The director of The Day After, is Nicholas Myer and the producer is Robert A. Papazian. The three main characters in this film include Dr. Russell Oakes played by Jason Robards, Stephen Klien played by Steve Guttenburg, and Jim Dahlberg played by John Cullum.