Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
4 elements of a valid contract
4 elements of a valid contract
What are the four elements of a valid contract
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: 4 elements of a valid contract
The report analyses the various elements that are necessary for the validity of a contract. These elements consists of offer and acceptance, consideration, intention to create legal relationship, capacities of parties to contract, certainty of meanings and the necessary legal formalities. Offer and acceptance are the main elements to which the confirmation of an agreement is brought upon. Consideration deals more with the benefits that the party will expect to get from the contractual deal. For a contractual deal to occur, the intention of both parties should be clear which evoke the element of certainty and intention to create legal relationships. Moreover certain requirements on behalf of the parties are also to be considered as not everyone has the capacity to enter a contract. If those elements are not present within a contract, it will be termed as being invalid. The elements for causing the invalidity of a contract comprise of misrepresentation, duress, undue influence, mistake and illegality. Introduction “The law of contract may be provisionally described as that branch of law which determines the circumstances in which a promise shall be legally binding on that person making it.” This report brings out the elements which are enforceable by law to make a contract. Those elements are namely offer and acceptance, intention to create legal relationship, lawful consideration, capacity of parties to contract, certainty of meaning and necessary legal formalities. If these elements are not indulged into the contract, it will be termed as an invalid one. A valid contract is an agreement between two parties binding each other legally. It is also described as an agreement that is enforceable by law. It exists many b... ... middle of paper ... ...the opposite can be proven. In the case of Balfour v Balfour (1919), the husband went to work in Ceylon and agreed to pay his wife $30 per month. He didn’t pay the money and the wife sued him. It was held that there was no contract because the parties didn’t intend to create a legal relationship. In business and commercial agreements, which are more formal in nature; there exists an intention to create legal relations. Like in the case of Edwards’s v Skyways (1964), the plaintiff who was a pilot was made redundant by the defendant. He had been informed by his pilots’ association that he would be given an ex gratia payment. The defendant failed to pay to pilot sued. The defendant argued that use of the words ex gratia. The court held that this agreement related to business matters and was presumed to be binding and the defendants had failed to rebut this presumption.
The article suggests that mutual intention should replace objective presumptions of intention to provide sufficient evidence for contract formations and argues that the Australian court system has a long way to go. It further investigates the different court hierarchies and examines the impact to them through different case law. The central argument presents that evidence of intention should be of utmost importance and considered in every case, negating a flat objective
contract “refers to a contract drafted by one party in a position of power, leaving the weaker party
The article "When is a contract legally enforceable?", helped me understand legally enforceable because it talks about the elements of a contract which are "offer and acceptance, legal consideration, capacity to create a
Contracts are legal binding agreements whether verbally or written between two or more competent people. They also can be contractual agreements between businesses for services or goods, employment, trade, or lease. Regardless of what type of contract the parties are entering there are six elements they need to follow in order to come to a successful legal understanding. Contracts are built on the fundamentals of offer and acceptance, intention to create legal relations, consideration, legal capacity, consent, and illegal and void contracts. Any contract which represents false statements, unwarranted
HILLIARD, J. And O’SULLIVAN, J. (2012) The Law of Contract [Online] 5th Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available from - http://books.google.co.uk/ [Accessed: 2nd January 2014]
Intention to create legal relations can be defined as follows. ‘An agreement will only become a legally binding contract if the parties intend this to be so. This will be strongly presumed in the case of business agreements but presumed otherwise if the agreement is of a friendly, social or domestic nature.’ Source (HNC unit 5 Business law course book) In determining whether the parties intend their agreements to be legally binding the court is guided by two presumptions. Parties to a domestic or social agreement do not intend to be legally bond. Parties to a business agreement intend to be legally bond. These are presumptions only and can be rebutted by sufficient evidence to the contrary. Domestic and Social Agreements Balfour v Balfour (1919) Merritt v Merritt (1976) Simpkins v Pays (1955) Business Agreements Jones v Vemons Pools (1938) Source (HNC Business law notes) One of the essential elements in the creation of a binding contract, this intention is implied by the fact that it is not expressly denied. If expressly denied (as in a so-called gentlemen's agreement) the contract may not be enforceable. Consideration {text:bookmark-start} {text:bookmark-end} If you look at a legal agreement or contract, you will generally see a phrase in the opening paragraph indicating that the parties agree on an amount of money or "other good and valuable consideration." The concept of consideration has a long history in the law, but simply means something of value. An exchange of consideration between the parties to an agreement is necessary fo...
There are three basic essentials to the creation of contract which will be recognised and enforced by the courts. These are: contractual intention, agreement and consideration.
This judgment given set criterion which is still been used in the modern court system and due to this case it was developed that an offer of contract can be unilateral and doesn’t have to be made to a specific party only. Also it was developed to that the acceptance of an offer does not require a notification and that once the concerned party purchases the product the contract is active then and there itself. And it was also established that purchase of an item is a fine example of consideration and therefore makes it a valid contract. (Smith, 2000).
The basic law of a contract is an agreement between two parties or more, to deliver a service or a product. And reach a consensus about the terms and conditions that is enforced by law and a contract can be only valid if it is lawful other than that there can’t be a contract. For a contract to exist the parties must have serious intentions, agreement, contractual capacity meaning a party must be able to carry a responsibility, lawful, possibility of performance and formalities. Any duress, false statements, undue influence or unconscionable dealings could make a contract unlawful and voidable.
Based on common law and precedent, the English law of contract has been formulated and developed over a number of years with it’s primary purpose to provide a regulated framework within which individuals can contract freely. In order to ensure a contract is enforceable there are certain elements which must be satisfied, one of which is the doctrine of consideration. Lord Denning famously professed; “the doctrine of consideration is too firmly fixed to be overthrown by a side wind” . This is a crucial indication that consideration has long been regarded as the cardinal ‘badge of enforceability’ in the formulation and variation of contracts in English common law.
A contract is an agreement between two parties in which one party agrees to perform some actions in return of some consideration. These promises are legally binding. The contract can be for exchange of goods, services, property and so on. A contract can be oral as well as written and also it can be part oral and part written but it is useful to have written contract otherwise issues can be created in future. But both the written as well as oral contract is legally enforceable. Also if there is a breach of contract, there are certain remedies for that which are discussed later in the assignment. There are certain elements which need to be present in a contract. These elements are discussed in the detail in the assignment. (Clarke,
One of the last remaining strongholds of classical contract law is the notion that contracts require offer and acceptance therefore, in order for a contract to become binding, offer, acceptance, consideration and intention to create legal relations must exist. However contracts are formed in different ways for each different circumstance. (Shawn Bayern, Offer and Acceptance in Modern Contract Law: A Needles Concept, 103 Cal. L. Rev. 67, 102 (2015)
Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. New York: Oxford UP, 1997. Print. The. Fuller, Lon L.
In the case of one party promising to give another party £50, it is merely seen as a gift, therefore this is considered unenforceable as a simple contract. This may be justifiable as there is nothing which clearly illustrates that, it is a necessity for a party to give something, in order for them to be able to enforce a promise. This is also known as the “quid pro quo,” it has been similarly illustrated in; Dunlop v Selfridge [1915] AC 847 (HL).
The area of law that is required in order to form a legally enforceable contract is agreement.